Author Topic: Were Chemical Attacks on Syrian Civilians Done by the Opposition to Frame Assad?  (Read 2043 times)

PeteWaldo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4106
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
From the moment I heard about chemical weapon attack on Syrian civilians, I wondered what on earth the Syrian government could gain by that, since Obama had previously invoked his "red line". The only thing Assad could have hoped to gain is an international attack against, and defeat of, himself.

Since the method of operation of Israeli Muslims has always been to fire rockets from within, and to hide among their civilian populations - in order to maximize civilian casualties for propaganda purposes when their attacks are responded to by their Israeli victims - I presumed it would make perfect sense that the chemical attack was perpetrated by the opposition to Assad, on their own innocent civilians, to frame Assad in order to get international powers (that is, Barak Obama, since he increasingly stands alone) to attack the Syrian government.

Particularly since Assad's opposition could just chalk up the cold-blooded mass murder of their own, as a sort of necessary "martyrdom", with the dead all in Muhammad's "paradise" now. Even perhaps justifying it by believing it would shorten the time, it would otherwise take the Muslim Brotherhood to win, with fewer total casualties in the long run. An added bonus for Obama's joining hands in the effort could be a chemical attack against Israel, killing Israeli Jews, and further advancing his and Jeremiah Wright's Islamic conquest of Israel.

Attacking your own and blaming others is right out of Hitler's playbook. Hitler seems to have learned from Muhammad and Muslims perhaps learned their false flagging from Hitler.

Worst of all - particularly if this is a spurious false flag event but even if not - Iran has promised to attack Israel in the event the U.S. attacks Syria.
iran promises to attack israel if u.s. attacks syria

Let alone that Russia and China will side with Assad. So Obama is willing to risk WWIII just to advance he and his brother's Muslim Brotherhood conquest of Syria.

Following are a couple articles by Yossef Bodansky who is the Senior Editor of WorldTribune.com
First his creds:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossef_Bodansky

"Yossef Bodansky (born in Israel) is an Israeli-American political scientist who served as Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare of the US House of Representatives from 1988 to 2004. He is also Director of Research of the International Strategic Studies Association and has been a visiting scholar at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). In the 1980s, he served as a senior consultant for the Department of Defense and the Department of State.

He is also a senior editor for the Defense and Foreign Affairs group of publications and a contributor to the International Military and Defense Encyclopedia and is on the Advisory Council of The Intelligence Summit. Bodansky's numerous articles have been published in Global Affairs, Jane's Defense Weekly, Defense and Foreign Affairs: Strategic Policy and other periodicals."
_____________________________

http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/08/28/mounting-evidence-raises-questions-about-syrian-chemical-weapon-attack/

"Mounting evidence raises questions about Syrian chemical weapon attack

Special to WorldTribune.com

Yossef Bodansky, Senior Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs

There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the Aug. 21 chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a premeditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.

The extent of U.S. foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.

On Aug. 13-14, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major and irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and representatives of Qatari, Turkish, and U.S. Intelligence [“Mukhabarat Amriki”] took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors. Very senior opposition commanders who had arrived from Istanbul briefed the regional commanders of an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development” which would, in turn, lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.

The opposition forces had to quickly prepare their forces for exploiting the U.S.-led bombing in order to march on Damascus and topple the Bashar al-Assad government, the senior commanders explained. The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive.

Indeed, unprecedented weapons distribution started in all opposition camps in Hatay Province on Aug. 21-23. In the Reyhanli area alone, opposition forces received well in excess of 400 tons of weapons, mainly anti-aircraft weaponry from shoulder-fired missiles to ammunition for light-guns and machine guns. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish Intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. Intelligence."

Much more:
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/08/28/mounting-evidence-raises-questions-about-syrian-chemical-weapon-attack/
________________________________

"Could the Chemical Attack in Ghouta be the Markale of the Syrian War"

"Then, on August 28, 1995, at around 11:00 hrs local, a mortar shell appeared to hit the Markale market-place in Sarajevo, killing 38 people and wounding another 90. Russian Col. Andrei Demurenko, then the commander of UN Forces in Sarajevo, immediately rushed with an UNPROFOR team to the supposed Bosnian-Serb mortar positions and ascertained that none of them could have been used to fire the mortar rounds."

"On August 21, 2013, the Syrian opposition announced a massive chemical attack in Ghouta which allegedly inflicted about 1,300 fatalities including hundreds of children. As in previous chemical attacks blamed on the Assad Administration, the attackers used the ubiquitous Sarin nerve gas. Immediately, the opposition flooded Western media with pictures of the dead, but provided no conclusive evidence about the attack and the perpetrators."

http://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/Middle-East/Could-the-Chemical-Attack-in-Ghouta-be-the-Markale-of-the-Syrian-War.html
____________________________

u.s. backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on syria?

PeteWaldo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4106
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chemical Attacks on Syrian Civilians the Work of the Opposition?
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2013, 01:30:12 PM »
Obama's is a replay of Bill Clinton enjoining his fellow globalists with Muslims in conquest of the Bosnian government, over another fraudulently blamed attack there.

http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/08/28/mounting-evidence-raises-questions-about-syrian-chemical-weapon-attack/

"Sarajevo, 1995 and Damascus, 2013: The use of mass attack deception to decide wars

Special to WorldTribune.com

Yossef Bodansky, Senior Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs

In August 1995, Western governments, and particularly the Bill Clinton White House, were in great quandary.

The negotiations with the Serbs were going well as President Slobodan Milosevic was demonstrating unprecedented flexibility and accepting virtually all the demands put forward by the West.

Hence, it was becoming politically and legally impossible for the U.S.-led West to launch the NATO military intervention which President Clinton had promised Bosnia-Herzegovina leader Alija Izetbegovic the U.S. would launch in order to quickly win the war for the Bosnian-Muslims.

Then, on Aug. 28, 1995, at around 11:00 hrs local, a mortar shell appeared to hit the Markale market place in Sarajevo, killing 38 people and wounding another 90. Russian Col. Andrei Demurenko, then the commander of UN Forces in Sarajevo, immediately rushed with an UNPROFOR team to the supposed Bosnian-Serb mortar positions and ascertained that none of them could have been used to fire the mortar rounds."

much more
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/08/28/mounting-evidence-raises-questions-about-syrian-chemical-weapon-attack/

PeteWaldo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4106
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Regarding the attack in Bosnia in 1995, it was confirmed by the U.N. Court, as having been falsely attributed to the Serbs:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/17341882/ns/world_news-europe/t/un-court-serbia-not-responsible-genocide/#.UidU0D8vtRs

"THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The United Nations’ highest court on Monday exonerated Serbia of direct responsibility for the mass slaughter of Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica during the 1992-95 Bosnia war, but ruled that it failed to prevent genocide."

http://www.amtvmedia.com/what-youre-not-being-told-about-syrias-chemical-attack/

According to that video "Blame, according to many, was placed squarely on a Croat commander."

PeteWaldo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4106
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
I must have misunderstood the talking heads on TV yesterday. I got the impression that because Syria admitted to having such weapons - which I didn't know they denied - that somehow that constituted an admission that they used them on the Syrian people. Is there something that I missed?