Islam, Muslim / Christian Forum - Welcome All

From Steve Cioccolanti
https://www.quora.com/Is-Google-search-engine-biased/answer/Steve-Cioccolanti-1

[1] Why Google Ranks Negative Content Higher by Private Investigator Michael Roberts of Rexxfield
https://youtu.be/tMTCCT_NtBk

[2] The Unprecedented Power of Digital Platforms to Control Opinions and Votes -
https://promarket.org/unprecedented-power-digital-platforms-control-opinions-votes/

[3] LEAKED VIDEO: Google Leadership's Dismayed Reaction to Trump Election | Breitbart
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/

The fear of truth on the left is palpable. When confronted with the words of the Google executive, in typical fashion, he attacks the messenger Veritas - and then in classic cowardly fashion blocks me, to prevent me from replying to his ridiculous reply. Perhaps we need to open a hall of shame.
If you are reading this and still use Google, what is your excuse?
https://www.quora.com/Is-Google-radically-biased-against-Christians-conservatives-life-and-truth/answer/Lance-Enchantie/comment/122436622

https://www.quora.com/Is-Google-search-engine-biased/answer/Steve-Cioccolanti-1

From Quora

"Steve Cioccolanti, Social Media Influencer w 250,000+ subs on YouTube at YouTube
Answered September 18, 2018

Google controls 90% of all internet searches; they decide what you get to see.

In 2012, Michael Roberts a private investigator verified Donald Trump's allegations that Google elevates negative content. He found it does and coined the term "humiliation algorithm" to explain why Google has a financial incentive to humiliate you.[1]

In 2013, a research psychologist discovered the search engine manipulation effect (SEME), one of the largest behavioral change in humans ever studied. These changes of preferences, sentiments, and even election votes resulted from Google’s manipulation of search results. Psychologist Robert Epstein has been at the forefront of criticizing Google's bias. He cites a study of more than 10,000 people from 39 countries which suggests Google "has likely been determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the national elections in the world for several years now, with increasing impact each year as Internet penetration has grown."[2]

Google denies it manipulates search results to alter user sentiments. If there was any doubt remaining about Google’s bias, a leaked video published by Breitbart[3] on 12 September 2018 proves Google's top executives despise conservatives, especially the sitting President Donald J. Trump."

Have Ilhan Omar & CAIR Bred Acceptance of Today’s Rampant Anti-Semitism?

The ongoing horror over the rhetoric of America’s new Muslim congresswomen has turned to questions over whether Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, along with other prominent Islamists, have contributed to the acceptance of the rampant anti-Semitism being displayed in the U.S. today.

In addition, did the  failure by Democrats in the House to censure Omar help to create a breeding ground for extremists on both sides of the political spectrum to take it to the next step — physical violence, which is what we are seeing now?

2019 has seen shocking upticks in attacks against Jews that are increasing daily in frequency and intensity. Here are the “contributions” to today’s rampant anti-Semitism that some of the most prominent and vocal Islamists on the U.S. scene today made in 2019:

 
Ilhan Omar

Omar’s rampant anti-Semitism was in full force as soon as she was elected. While she was campaigning, she said she didn’t support the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) movement against Israel. But just days after her election, she changed her tune, saying that she did, in fact, believe in and support the BDS movement.

It was a stunning display of duplicity.

According to the definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and officially adopted by the U.S. (and 31 other nations, including many in the European Union), the BDS movement has been deemed at its core an anti-Semitic movement.

This is fundamentally because the movement “[applies] double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of by any other democratic nation.” For example, there are at least 100 land disputes across the globe that are not subject to “BDS” movements.

Omar’s outbursts of shocking anti-Semitism dominated the conversation in 2019, as the headlines of Clarion’s articles show:

    Should We Believe Ilhan Omar’s Apology Over Anti-Semitic Tweet  (January 2019)
    Ilhan Omar Tweets More Anti-Semitic Tropes (February 2019)
    Ilhan Omar Rages Anti-Semitism; Pelosi Whimpers ‘Apologize (February 2019)
    Horror Over Muslim Congresswomen Turns Heads To Muslim Reform Women (March 2019)
    Islamist Thugs Abuse Muslim Reformist Women Calling Out Ilham Omar’s Anti-Semitism
    Ilhan Omar Lets Rip Another Outburst of Anti-Semitism (July 2019)

 
Linda Sarsour & Zahra Billoo

2019 saw big names in the U.S. Islamist scene — sharia- apologist Linda Sarsour and CAIR official Zahra Billoo — were kicked out of the Women’s March for spewing anti-Semitism.

Sarsour not only promoted the anti-Semitic BDS movement, but her rhetoric was so racist at times that she managed to label Jews as white supremacists in order to remove them from a protected class and demonize them among the “intersectional” victim crowd.

Clarion’s top stories about Linda Sarsour and her anti-Semitism in 2019 included:

    Linda Sarsour Uses Latest Women’s March to Spew Anti-Semitism (January 2019)
    Calling Out Anti-Semitism: the New Islamophobic Crime (March 2019)
    Women’s March Kicks Out Linda Sarsour, But Replaces Her With … (September 2019)
    Linda Sarsour Compares Jews to White Supremacists (December 2019)

Anti-American Islamist Zahra Billoo was set to replace Linda Sarsour as a board member in the Women’s March movement. However, due to tremendous and immediate backlash after her appointment due to Billoo’s anti-Semitism, the Women’s March rescinded their invitation in a big win in 2019.

 
The Council on American-Islamic Relations

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) spent a tremendous amount of energy and resources last year promoting the anti-Semitic BDS movement. While they spoke from one side of their mouth condemning physical attacks on Jews, they were busy suing state governments over anti-BDS legislation and opposing the adoption of the IHRA’s definition of anti-Semitism by the Department of Education.

CAIR filed lawsuits in a number of states who have laws on the books against the BDS movement. They even awarded their “Muslim of the Year Award” to a woman who CAIR helped fight for the right to be anti-Semitic while working in a public school in America.

CAIR’s Muslim of the Year Award was given to Bahia Amawi, a Texas speech pathologist who lost her job in a Texas public school because she refused to comply with the state’s anti-BDS legislation.

Here were Clarion’s top stories documenting CAIR’s overt anti-Semitism in 2019:

    CAIR: Defending the Right to Be Anti-Semitic (April 2019)
    Shocking Recipient of CAIR’s ‘Muslim of the Year’ Award (October 2019)
    CAIR’s Zahra Billoo Throws Anti-Semitic Fit  (October 2019)
    CAIR Leads Fight for ‘Right’ of Universities to Promote Anti-Semitism (December 2019)

 
Rashida Tlaib

Rashifa Tlaib is also a vocal supporter of the anti-Semitic BDS movement. Tlaib also made waves this year for her close connections with Hezbollah supporters. Hezbollah — an Iranian-proxy Lebanese terror group — is dedicated to killing Jews and wiping out the state of Israel

Our top stories in 2019 on Talib’s anti-Semitism included:

    Rep. Rashida Tlaib Fetes Hezbollah Supporter (January 2019)
    Rep. Tlaib Requests Taxpayers Fund Her Anti-Semitism (January 2019)
    The Friends of Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib’s Friends (January 2019)

In addition, Tlaib had the gall to request public funds to finance a Congressional delegation to the Palestinian Authority-controlled territories in Israel, essentially putting the U.S. in a situation where American tax dollars would be supporting an anti-American political body that has a history of paying terrorists – some of whom have specifically targeted and killed American citizens.

    Rep. Tlaib Requests Taxpayers Fund Her Anti-Semitism

Louis Farrakhan

Louis Farrakhan wins the prize for his overt and unapologetic anti-Semitism. His hate is out there for everyone to see.

Farrakhan’s organization, the Nation of Islam, has a long history of Holocaust denial and demonizing Jews. Farrakhan regularly calls Jews “Satanic” and claims that they “control everything and mostly everybody.” He refers to Jews as the “synagogue of Satan” and “termites.”

    Hate Preacher Farrakhan to Speak at ‘Love’ Church  (September 2019)

https://clarionproject.org/muslim-patrol-head-nixes-peace-agreement-with-bloods

"Radical Imam Siraj Wahhaj, the de facto head of New York’s controversial Muslim Patrol, rejected a proposed peace agreement between a lieutenant of his patrol and a notorious member of the Bloods street gang.

In a dangerous meeting, Muslim Patrol lieutenant Ali Karim went to the home of Bloods gang member Big Infinite, father of the teen who was thrown against the fence surrounding Wahhaj’s mosque by a Muslim patrol member for insulting a Muslim woman.

It was this incident that started the feud.

See Clarion Project’s Special Report on New York’s Sharia Patrol

Four Muslim bodyguards accompanied Karim to the evening meeting at a Gates Avenue duplex, while the Bloods had seven members in attendance.  Two of the Bloods were reportedly armed.

For a week, Karim tried to get a meeting with an influential Bloods member to calm down the potentially explosive situation.

Had the peace deal been accepted, the Muslim patrol would have stopped policing Gates Avenue and Marcus Boulevard in Brooklyn, N.Y., home to a notorious faction of the Bloods gang.  In exchange, the Bloods would have agreed to inflicting no further violence on members of Wahhaj’s Taqwa mosque in Brooklyn, which is largely seen as the force behind the Muslim patrol.

At the sit-down, the Bloods originally demanded that Karim, who serves directly beneath Wahhaj, turn over the Muslim patrol member who roughed up the teen or at least give them his address. Only then, the Bloods stipulated, would violence against Masjid Taqwa (Taqwa mosque) and the Muslim patrol be suspended.

Karim dismissed that demand and asked for an alternative peace plan that would involve the Muslim patrol agreeing to stop sending their police cruisers (styled to look like New York Police Department patrol vehicles) into the Bloods’ neighborhoods.

Karim also told the Bloods that the Muslim patrol member who attacked the boy had been fired.

At the time, a inside source cultivated by Christian Action Network said of Wahhaj, “He’ll probably agree. For Imam Wahhaj to give that boy [the Muslim patrol member] up to the Bloods would be a great injustice towards Islam. Muslim blood is not to be shed by the kaffir [non-Muslims]. I think he’ll agree and tell the patrol cars not to go there. There’s no benefit to the Muslims. There’s not a mosque over there.”

Yet, when Wahhaj was informed of the proposed peace agreement, Wahhaj told Karim to give the former Muslim patrol member’s address to the Bloods.

Those close to Wahhaj believe the controversial religious leader rejected the agreement because he doesn’t trust the Bloods to keep their word and stop the violence.

“The Bloods can’t be trusted for anything,” said a source familiar with both the Bloods and Wahhaj.

Though the source disagreed with Wahhaj’s decision, he said, “Wahhaj believes sometimes you have to sacrifice the one to protect the whole. He’s got to protect his mosque members and he’s got to protect his [Muslim patrol] workers.  And if that means someone has to go missing-in-action to achieve that peace, he believes that’s the right thing to do.”

The feud between the two groups began December 10 when an Muslim patrol member threw a teenage boy against a fence for allegedly “disrespecting” a Muslim woman in front of the Taqwa mosque. The boy happened to be the son of an “Original Gangster” (OG) of the Bloods.

A few days later, a Muslim man was severely beaten outside the mosque in a retaliatory attack.

Following the retaliation, Karim asked for a parley with the Bloods gang, which had labeled the mosque and Muslim patrol members as “food” for the gang’s notorious “dogs.”

Karim is second in command of Muslim patrol and responsible for hiring patrolmen, supervising the group’s marked patrol vehicles and assigning duties to “officers.” Karim does not hold an official title with the nonprofit organization, which has repeatedly been accused of trying to enforce Sharia law in the city.

At press time, Karim had not turned over the address of the ex-Muslim patrol member to the Bloods, hoping a better solution could be found."

https://clarionproject.org/muslim-patrol-head-nixes-peace-agreement-with-bloods