"Psychologist Robert Epstein has been at the forefront of criticizing Google's bias. He cites a study of more than 10,000 people from 39 countries which suggests
Google "has likely been determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the national elections in the world for several years now, with increasing impact each year as Internet penetration has grown." (
more of this quote in a lower post).
The video at the following link exposes Google's blatant bias and brainwashing against conservatives and in favor of the political left, that they ridiculously attempt to whitewash the reason their search engine wastes everyone's time who uses it, as being Google's employee's notions of "algorithmic fairness" or "ML fairness" (machine learning "
fairness").
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/https://youtu.be/y9pIfGqo_XoOne only needs to know what the "head of responsible innovation" at Google (caught in an honest moment on a hidden video camera (prior link)), that is in charge of the department
that manipulates search results as well as autocomplete (which diminishes otherwise popular website's popularity) who admitted:
"The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand. That they were not saying what's fair and what's equitable so we're like, well we are a big company, so we're going to say it."
"
People who voted for the current president do not agree with our definition of fairness."
"
We are also training our algorithms if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?"
"2020, certainly on top of my old organization, Trust and Safety, top of mind,
they've been working on it since 2016, to make sure we are ready for 2020."
"We got called in front of Congress multiple times..... Like they can pressure us but we're not changing."
"Elizabeth Warren is saying that we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she's very misguided. Like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because
all these smaller companies who don't have the same resources we do
will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it's like
a small company cannot do that."
Our definition of fairness is one of those things that we thought would be like, obvious, and everyone would agree to it and it wasn't. There was,
the same people who voted for our current president who do not agree with our definition of fairness."
"
We all got screwed over in 2016. Again it wasn't just us, it was,
the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we're rapidly been like what happened there, and
how can we prevent it from happening again?"
Well gee, so at least Google is only biasing their search engine results and autocomplete, against half of the voters in the United States and all the conservatives in the world! What a relief!
If you are on the political left and don't mind the bias being in your favor, do you think you are going to have a voice in deciding who the democrat candidate for president will be?
Democrat candidate Tulsi Gabbard is suing Google for $50 million dollars for spiking her campaign.https://www.bing.com/search?q=tulsi+gabbard+sues+google&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=tulsi+gabbard+sues+google&sc=2-25&sk=&cvid=0F8F1D8C8DE04BD28AB0DD49C6019364Where will your voice be left as Google's search result bias continues to trend even more wacky toward things like transgender hormones for children, gender identity or full blown communism? Will you ultimately be forced by the government to give your minor child hormones to change their sex?
"We have since moved on to the second wave, Cretella told The Federalist. "The second wave is going on now, with emergency room staff, therapists, or doctors
reporting parents to Child Protective Services who refuse to affirm their child's false gender.""
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/02/state_power_now_being_used_to_force_parents_to_transgender_their_kids__or_else.htmlClick a second time if it doesn't load.
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2019/10/24/transgender-boy-transitioning-to-life-as-girl-changes-his-mind/They refer to bias-related censorship as "deboosting conservatives" at FaceBook.
Click on the following search - american inventors - first in Bing or Yahoo and then in Google, and see which search engine seems to best reflect the likely popularity of individual inventors and inventions that are being searched for, and which search engine would seem to contain severely manipulated results in order to advance an agenda of "algorithmic fairness".
Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?q=american+inventors&form=QBLH&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=american+inventors&sc=8-18&qs=n&sk=&cvid=4A00D7AD7A35442F98870C820C6B963FGoogle
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=Ma6lXfD1Ac2osgXUwZ3IBQ&q=american+inventors&oq=american+inventors&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.1739.5655..9362...0.0..0.569.3980.0j12j2j1j1j2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0i10.Vqh0qfElYUg&ved=0ahUKEwiw0s6plZ7lAhVNlKwKHdRgB1kQ4dUDCAc&uact=5Would any sane, rational, person actually
desire to have their time wasted by Google?
UPDATE - When I wrote this thread just 5 month ago, the inventors pictured in the thumbnails at Bing were the most famous inventors. Now since Google owns about 95% (conservatively) of internet searches, Bing's algorithms have been poisoned by the number of hits obscure inventors have received on Google through their manipulation. The thumbnails described on Bing as "American inventors frequently mentioned on the web". END UPDATE
Historyofmecca.com was #1 page 1 on every search engine
including Google, within the first few weeks of its initial publishing. It maintained that ranking for years. Today it has dropped to #3 on Bing, Yahoo and Duckduckgo, because the home page cannot be found in the 46 pages that Google offered with the search - history of mecca. If you don't believe what Google is doing is brainwashing, consider the cognitive impairment of a Google advocate who recently commented on my complaint by saying "it doesn't look like your site is that popular". In other words he lacked the capacity for critical thought to even understand
why it became unpopular -
at Google!
Try the search - history of mecca - As of 11-16-19 historyofmecca.com was
#3 on page 1 on Bing https://www.bing.com/search?q=history+of+mecca&qs=n&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=history+of+mecca&sc=8-16&sk=&cvid=05F7BE41F07B473D8BF0389FE380E285#3 on page 1 on Yahoo https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=history+of+mecca&fr=yfp-t&fp=1&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8#3 page 1 on duckduckgohttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=history+of+mecca&t=hx&ia=webYet was never to be found in a search of 46 pages on Googlehttps://www.google.com/search?biw=1024&bih=576&ei=vhrQXd3wB4L8tAXLyoTwBQ&q=history+of+mecca&oq=history+of+mecca&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0i71l8.0.0..25371...0.3..0.0.0.......0......gws-wiz.VzVPo56HI34&ved=0ahUKEwjdx77giu_lAhUCPq0KHUslAV44tgIQ4dUDCAoNor is it to be found on any of Google's slaves like Startpage or ask.com for example
The sites that Google steers unwary users toward instead, are Islamic sites that parrot unhistorical Islamic so-called "tradition", that was all created from thin air and put to the pen in the 7th to 10th centuries AD without reference to any actual historical record of Mecca that preceded the 5th century AD.
There is not a shred of scriptural, historical or archaeological evidence that supports the geographical impossibility of Islamic so-called "tradition". Particularly telling since actual ancient Arabian towns are very well attested in the historical and archaeological records of Arabia (visit Dr. Rafat Amari's 20-year full-time study for more at RRI
http://rrimedia.org/Worldviews/Islam)
The only way to find historyofmecca.com on Google, is to enter it in the search box in just that fashion, and then it magically appears. A search of the separate words - history of mecca - will not allow the home page to be found.
Now click on the following search - false prophet muhammad - and you will find it is the page 1 #1 result on Bing and Yahoo, but when I did the following search I found that site does not appear until page 7 on Google (which is tantamount to not being there at all).
Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?q=false+prophet+muhammad&form=QBLH&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=false+prophet+muhammad&sc=0-22&qs=n&sk=&cvid=2867C0A53C134962A0B969B12E8D3E0AYahoo
https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=false+prophet+muhammad&fr=yfp-t&fp=1&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8Google
https://www.google.com/search?ei=WxrLXaP7HsbGsQXGh7XgDA&q=false+prophet+muhammad&oq=false+prophet+muhammad&gs_l=psy-ab.3...21629.25871..25977...0.2..2.449.3135.12j6j2j1j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i131j0i67j0.f5_oV6QEAzM&ved=0ahUKEwjjlLvXxeXlAhVGY6wKHcZDDcwQ4dUDCAo&uact=5Ditto for the search - islam christian forum - #1 on page 1 on Bing and Yahoo, page 6 on Google
Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?q=islam+christian+forum&qs=HS&pq=islam+&sc=8-6&cvid=48D5F6CB9CAC4D41B1B2F457717ED203&FORM=QBLH&sp=1Yahoo
https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=islam+christian+forum&fr=yfp-t&fp=1&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8Google
https://www.google.com/search?q=islam+christian+forum&ei=69-1XZq5DcW4tQXjg5-gDg&start=30&sa=N&ved=0ahUKEwja2uv_hr3lAhVFXK0KHePBB-QQ8tMDCKkB&biw=1024&bih=613Would anyone, whether Christian or atheist, conservative or liberal (except perhaps a deranged snowflake)
, actually desire to be brainwashed - or just have so much of their time wasted with less germane search results - when they could otherwise simply switch to Bing, Yahoo or Duckduckgo and find more traditional results ranked by website popularity usually as a result of being the most germane in regard to the subject being searched? All search engines are not alternatives because, for example, StartPage buys Google's search results so it is effectively just another Google brainwashing site.
Now try typing - hillary clinton crimes - and you will notice that Google quits autofilling the search after you type “hillary clinton cri”, which would suggest that next to nobody in the world has ever had enough interest in the subject to do a search like that. It's no surprise that once you click on the search in google it returns a page of largely whitewashed website articles that attempt to minimize Hillary’s crimes.
Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?q=hillary+clinton%27s+crimes&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=hillary+clinton%27s+crimes&sc=4-24&qs=n&sk=&cvid=6B92A9F064B948AEA70BCDCC12F46D1CGoogle
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1024&bih=613&ei=xbalXfzRE8nwsAXxr5bYBg&q=hillary+clinton%27s+crimes&oq=hillary+clinton%27s+crimes&gs_l=psy-ab.12...0.0..2399...0.0..0.0.0.......0......gws-wiz.1p-dYl8QqxU&ved=0ahUKEwi8yPHAnZ7lAhVJOKwKHfGXBWsQ4dUDCAoIf you don't think Google is going to own the 2020 elections -
unless the American electorate gets wise to what they are up to and abandons Google in all forms - simply consider that Google already moved millions of votes during the 2016 election, as detailed by even a Google insider that hails to the label of liberal.
https://sputniknews.com/us/201609121045214398-google-clinton-manipulation-election/https://sputniknews.com/world/201906261076054256-google-nazi-peterson-shapiro-search-suggestions-report/https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/12/03/dr-robert-epstein-moderate-republicans-most-vulnerable-to-google-influence/An example of another company is Pinterest labeling the popular pro-life site
https://www.liveaction.org/ as "porn" to reduce people's ability to find it in results.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/R_twL2a3-DQ/Everyone who uses Google for anything, is not only having a lot of their time wasted by having to sort through lower interest obscure websites, but at the same time is financing - aiding and abetting - Google in advancing their agenda. Do you care enough about your kid's future to use another search engine, or are you satisfied with Google employees eventually ruling the world, by selecting its rulers as they already are?
Read it again - "We got called in front of Congress multiple times..... Like they can pressure us but we're not changing."
So the only way to change Google is to abandon using the Google search engine and switch to Bing, Yahoo or Duckduckgo or any other independent search engine, rather than continue to finance Google's brainwashing by continuing to use it, with the ultimate goal of rendering them as irrelevant as the Netscape browser is today.
If leftists are myopic enough to continue to support Google until they control all information (as if they don't already), what will you do when they start goring your particular ox's? Various leftist factions would be in the same position as the Sunnis vs Shiites in Islam (i.e. Iran-Iraq War).
I can’t imagine that anybody, whatever their walk of life, whether conservative or liberal or whether religious or secular, would want to have their time wasted through search results that are manipulated, filtered and censored through the blatant bias of random people that work at Google, when there are alternative search engines like Bing and Yahoo that return search results in a more traditional and unbiased - or at least less biased - manner.
As a direct victim of Google’s blatant bias - censoring our sites from their search engine that otherwise rank #1, #2 or #3 at Yahoo, Bing and DuckDuckGo (and yes our sites are "mobile friendly" according to Google's testing utility), I personally do everything in my power to prevent Google from touching my life, from never using the Google search engine, to not uploading or uninstalling the Google Chrome browser from my computers, to using a proxy, to having returned an android phone within the 10 day trial, after I discovered that contrary to the salesman's pitch, Google was all up inside it requiring “Google Play” to do most anything. Let alone that Apple is much more respectful of user’s privacy with their IPhone.
I use Bing as my home page, and there is an interesting new photo on the page every day, that I quite enjoy as a bonus. The video related to this page had to be uploaded to
BitChute because it would not have lasted long on YouTube before being censored, as so many others are, because Google owns YouTube. On the subject of video entertainment, unless you want Google prying even deeper into your life, avoid YouTube TV (Google) and try Roku TV or some other alternative instead.
Google's censorship of Internet content extends beyond left/right to being
against Christianity in favor if Islam, against life in favor of abortion, against free speech and in favor of censorship. Google also steers toward Islamic sites (the left is one with Islam) and wishful secular sites, along with ecumenical Christian sites, that believe that all roads lead to heaven while wishing in vain that Islam and Christianity were somehow related, even though Islam is as opposite to Christianity as
Muhammad was to Jesus Christ. With Muhammad having denied the whole subject of the Gospel, while being a false prophet to the extent of constituting pure blasphemy, against the God of the Christians and Jews.
Surah 4:157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus ..... but they killed him not, nor crucified him ..... for of a surety they killed him not:-John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Surah 19:88
They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" 89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!1 John 2:22 .....
He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father.....
Surah 18:4
Further, that He may warn those (also) who say, "God hath begotten a son": 5 No knowledge have they of such a thing, nor had their fathers. It is a grievous thing that issues from their mouths as a saying what they say is nothing but falsehood!John 3:36
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/islam_is_antichrist.htmGoogle’s Islamism is further exposed if you type it in yourself. You will see the autocomplete stops offering suggestions once you type “false prophet mu”, or “false prophet moh”, which seems to suggest that you are one of a very few people in the world that ever tried a search like that.
In a different word order the same censorship happens at “muhammad fals”.
However when you enter "muhammad true" you are offered several suggested links to try.
Every time Google manipulates the autocomplete results (which are heavily used) with sites that are less popular and information that is not actually being searched for, they relegate what had been popular sites to being less popular and harder to find. In other words it advances the sites of topics of the political Left like advancing speech regulation, abortion and Islam, while diminishing sites of "the same people who voted for our current president" - in other words half the voters in our country - to the obscure back pages of a website search.
The Project Veritas Google whistle blower video, that exposed Google's blatant bias, was banned on YouTube because YouTube is owned by Google. Though it may have been restored by Google after so many people expressed outrage, to save face.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/https://youtu.be/DeVM-s7xXhUBut most articles and videos mainly discuss
search suggestions that pop up as you type into the blank. They seem to barely even mention biased rankings of search
results, that are far more damning and would swing far more opinions and votes, that are so obvious in just the examples I demonstrated.
Because of Google's extreme secular, pro-abortion, left-wing bias and pro-active "logarithmic" so-called "fairness" while setting themselves up as,
in their words, "gatekeepers" between citizens and information - that they admit to exercising (
when caught on hidden camera) - as evidenced through their censorship and manipulation of search suggestions as well as results, makes them more of a publisher than a platform and thus should not be excluded under Section
230 of the Communications Decency Act, so Google and
YouTube should be treated as publishers and held liable for all of the content on their search engine and video site. Held liable for the damage they inflict against conservative, Christian and pro-life content.
No matter what your religion, lack thereof, or political persuasion,
do you want others to decide what information you are allowed to see and what information a bunch of Google employees decide should be hidden from you? Perhaps only if you are a snowflake that believes the Internet should be your own personal safe space and only display results that conform to what you have been indoctrinated to believe.
Do the same searches for the websites listed at the bottom of my posts and you will find they are censored on Google when compared to Bing and Yahoo.
Some other search engines like
Startpage pay google to use their results, so they are propagandizing you with Google's bias as well. So switching to them will not accomplish anything. It appears that
Ask.com does the same but I didn't verify that they pay Google for results as I did verify with Startpage. It's hard for me to imagine they aren't aware of what's going on.
Ask returns similar results in which it didn't appear on page 1-6 and when I clicked page 7 it said "no results for history of mecca"
https://www.ask.com/web?o=0&l=dir&qo=serpSearchTopBox&q=history+of+meccaIs there any reason to use Google or any of their slaves, when Bing and Yahoo return at least less biased results or perhaps even results without bias? Let alone that using Google helps to finance Google's censorship, by offering them your searches for free, for them to sell to others. Why expose your email to them with Gmail? Do you want to finance their bias by using them for anything at all, including an android phone, instead of using a much more private IPhone?
Google's anti-Christian bias Google's pro-abortion biasGoogles blatant anti-Christianity, pro-Islam, anti-conservative, pro-liberal, anti-life, pro-abortion, anti-free speech pro-censorship bias, is basically anti-truth and pro-falsehood, because the left must always censor truth since - like communism and Islam - their doctrine cannot stand in the light of the truth. That's why students riot, instead of simply not attending the event, when a conservative is scheduled to speak on their campuses. The weird thing is, that they themselves can't see, that it is because of the lies they have been indoctrinated to believe. Even with Venezuela as yet another example.
Isa 59:14
And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.
