ABC Stacked Audience With Pro-Islamics for 'Holy-War' Special
http://christianvoteralliance.org/61/abc-stocked-audience-with-pro-islamics-for-holy-war-special/
Folks seem surprised that the Muslim cleric declared to Christianana Amampour that the Islamic flag will some day fly over the White House.
Then the media, or at least Fox News, inadvertently went on to offer the biggest reason to believe the cleric is likely correct (if things in the media don't change), by characterizing the cleric as "radical" and "extreme".
The simple fact of the matter is that any Muslim that DOES NOT believe that the Islamic flag will one day fly over the White House would not only be a "radical" and "extreme" Muslim, but would be so radical as to be an Islamic apostate in the eyes of those in the cradle of the religion THAT UNDERSTAND ISLAM, it's prophet, and it's 1400 year goal of conquest of all the kingdoms of the world. (http://www.google.com/#hl=en&expIds=17259,26714,27014&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=islam+conquer+world&cp=14&pf=p&sclient=psy&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=islam+conquer+&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=9f2370386c77b788)
Global conquest is not "radical" or "extreme" but rather an obligatory Islamic duty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agOU2R6MTbg
Physical Jihad is the "pinnacle of Islam". (http://www.google.com/#hl=en&expIds=17259,25567,27007,27015&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=physical+jihad+pinnacle+of+islam&cp=9&pf=p&sclient=psy&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=physical+jihad+pinnacle+of+islam&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=9f2370386c77b788)
Like in Ahmadinejad's words (http://www.google.com/#hl=en&&sa=X&ei=lsGtTM2aFIGclgfpisXcCQ&sqi=2&ved=0CBoQBSgA&q=islam+conquer+world+ahmadinejad&spell=1&fp=9f2370386c77b788), when defining jihad, for example.