Islam, Muslim / Christian Forum - Welcome All

It seems you have not seen the video.

if you have seen it you would say another things

this is the book where the title "Son of God" appears more sparingly.

Mark insinuates that this title is satanic; the title appears in  his gospel on the mouth of demons (of Djins), or the mouth of demons (men).

Here the study:

I- on the mouth of demons (Djins)
Marc3 / 11: 11 And the unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God

Marc 5/7 "7 and, crying with a loud voice, he said: What is it between you and me, Jesus, Son of God Most High * I charge you by God, do not torment me? not.

II- on the lips of men demons
Marc 14/61: 61 And he was silent, and answered nothing. The priest still questioned, and said: Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? *
Marc15 / 39: "39 And the centurion, who stood vis-a-vis him, seeing that he had expired and shouting, saying, Certainly this was the Son of God.

Marc and 1/1 "1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God" is adulterated all learned Christians agreed that these two words do not exist in holy manuscript. (It is a forgery)


the recap: four times the title appears  on the mouth of devils and demons men.

that honor you dear Christian to be taught by satan

Jesus is son of God

But all of the four canonical Gospels agree that Jesus of Nazareth claimed to be and was indeed the prophesised Messiah and Son of God:-

From the 19th century Catholic critics and by the Protestant saw in the book of Mark a solid document to rewrite sane history of Jesus ,based on scientific evidence , far from the marvelous of Mathiew and the work of synthesis did by Luc h and apologetic purpose of John.


Marc is John Paul's companion in his first missionary journey. Acts tells us that John called Mark cut short his trip with Paul and promptly returned to Jerusalem.
just after his return (he would have submitted its report against Paul and his dangerous tendency to the message of the Gospel) the first council met.

for ample information he is the nephew of Barnabas (famous for its well known gospel of Muslims).


this is the book where the title "Son of God" appears more sparingly.

Mark insinuates that this title is satanic; it occurs in his gospel on the mouth of demons (of Djins), or the mouth of demons (men).

Here the study:

I- on the mouth of demons (Djins)

Marc3 / 11: 11 And the unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God

Marc 5/7 "7 and, crying with a loud voice, he said: What is it between you and me, Jesus, Son of God Most High * I charge you by God, do not torment me? not.

II- on the lips of men demons

Marc 14/61: 61 And he was silent, and answered nothing. The priest still questioned, and said: Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? *
Marc15 / 39: "39 And the centurion, who stood vis-a-vis him, seeing that he had expired and shouting, saying, Certainly this was the Son of God.

Marc and 1/1 "1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God" is adulterated all learned Christians agreed that these two words do not exist in holy manuscript. (It is a forgery)


the recap: four times appears the title of the Son of God pronounced by the devils and demons men.

that honor you dear Christian to be taught by Satan

   [/color]

    which is founded is that Jesus speaks about him even as the Son of man.

    never jesus did say son of God.


    the epithet "Son of man" appears in the Gospel ninety times (90 times)

    in Matthew: 31 times in Mark 18 times in Luke 26 times in John 15 times.

    here is the proof. Jesus said, "Son of man" in reaction to the Jews who slandered and dogs and pigs (pagans)


    not a single time Jesus qualifies himself as son of God.


    by Mathieu (maybe you need to reverse the right numbers is Chapter, left the number of the verse

    8/20; 9/6; 10/23; 11/19; 12/8; 12/32; 12/40; 13/37; 13/41; 16/13; 16/27; 16/28; 17 / 9; 17/12; 17/22; 18/11; 20/18; 20 /
    28; 24/27; 24/30; 24/30; 24/33; 24/37; 24/39; 24/44; 25/31; 26/2; 26/24; 26/24; 26/45; 26/64.

    by Marc

    ر 2/10; 2/28; 8/31; 8/38; 9/9; 9/12; 9/31; 9/38; 9/9; 9/12; 10/33; 10/45; 13 / 26; 13/29; 14/21; 14/21; 14/41; 14/62.

    Luke
    لو 5/24; 6/5; 6/22; 6/46; 7/34; 9/22; 9/26; 9/44; 9/58; 11/30; 12/8; 12/10
    ; 12/40; 17/22; 17/24; 17/26; 17/30; 18/8; 18/31; 19/10; 21/27; 21 /
    ; 22/22; 22/48; 22/69; 24/7

    by Jean
    .
    يو 1/51; 3/13; 3/14; 5/27; 6/27; 6/53; 6/62; 8/28; 9/35; 10/36; 11/41; 12/23; 12 / 34; 12/34; 13/31.







    Last edited by bahous; 02-09-16 at 02:58 AM.

From the 19th century Catholic critics and by the Protestant saw in the book of Mark a solid document to rewrite sane history of Jesus ,based on scientific evidence , far from the marvelous of Mathiew and the work of synthesis did by Luc h and apologetic purpose of John.


Marc is John Paul's companion in his first missionary journey. Acts tells us that John called Mark cut short his trip with Paul and promptly returned to Jerusalem.
just after his return (he would have submitted its report against Paul and his dangerous tendency to the message of the Gospel) the first council met.

for ample information he is the nephew of Barnabas (famous for its well known gospel of Muslims).


this is the book where the title "Son of God" appears more sparingly.

Mark insinuates that this title is satanic; it occurs in his gospel on the mouth of demons (of Djins), or the mouth of demons (men).

Here the study:

I- on the mouth of demons (Djins)

Marc3 / 11: 11 And the unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God

Marc 5/7 "7 and, crying with a loud voice, he said: What is it between you and me, Jesus, Son of God Most High * I charge you by God, do not torment me? not.

II- on the lips of men demons

Marc 14/61: 61 And he was silent, and answered nothing. The priest still questioned, and said: Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? *
Marc15 / 39: "39 And the centurion, who stood vis-a-vis him, seeing that he had expired and shouting, saying, Certainly this was the Son of God.

Marc and 1/1 "1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God" is adulterated all learned Christians agreed that these two words do not exist in holy manuscript. (It is a forgery)


the recap: four times appears the title of the Son of God pronounced by the devils and demons men.

that honor you dear Christian to be taught by S.atan

Just a few points:-

1) The land of Edom was about 1000km north of modern day Mecca. Muhammed was born in or around Mecca therefore he cannot be the one mentioned in Isaiah 63:1.

2) The OT prophet Daniel predicted the first advent of The Jewish Messiah to be during the years AD 29 and AD 33. Surely that also rules out Muhammed and pinpoints Jesus as The Jewish Messiah?

3) Isaiah 63 is highly prophetic and bears a striking resemblance to imagery of Revelation 19. This concerns the advent of the second coming of Jesus as The Jewish Messiah and the day of judgement to come after the restoration of Jerusalem in 1967. This is an event prophescised by Daniel (circa 537 BC) and confirmed by John circa AD 95 - to the year!

Isaiah 63:1-4

63 Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah, this that is glorious in His apparel, traveling in the greatness of his strength? “I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save.”

2 Why art thou red in Thine apparel, and Thy garments like him that treadeth in the wine vat?

3 “I have trodden the wine press alone; and of the people there was none with Me. For I will tread them in Mine anger and trample them in My fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon My garments, and I will stain all My raiment.

4 For the day of vengeance is in Mine heart, and the year of My redeemed is come.


Revelation 19:11-15

11 And I saw Heaven opened, and behold, a white horse; and He that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war.

12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written that no man knew, but He Himself.

13 And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood, and His name is called, The Word of God.

14 And the armies which were in Heaven, clothed in fine linen white and clean, followed Him upon white horses.

15 And out of His mouth goeth a sharp sword with which He shall smite the nations, and He shall rule them with a rod of iron; and He treadeth the wine press of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

This is why Jesus had to correct Jews saying :" how scribes can say the Messiah is descendant of David" Mark 12/35

and all the believers were awainting the Messiah : John 7/31 :" 31 But of the people many believed in him, and said: When the Christ cometh, shall he do "more miracles, than these which this man doth?

Jesua were always rejecting the title of Messiah : Then charged he the disciples that they should tell no man that he was the Christ



CEB version:  20 Then he ordered the disciples not to tell anybody that he was the Christ.


Another version

Then he strictly charged the disciples to tell no one that he was the Christ.

Sure, but as I said, the prophecy concerns the second coming of Christ in the wrath of God.
He is depicted as returning from Edom already spattered with the blood of God's enemies.

you agree that the Messiah is warrior. he is spattered with the blood of God's enemies


Jesus was not warrior.

Esias 63 /1-2: "Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bosra, this beautiful one in his robe, walking in the greatness of his strength. I,that speak justice, and am a defender to save. 2 Why then is thy apparel red, and thy garments like theirs that tread in the winepress?"


Edom is in north arabia land


all the texts in OT reffering to the Messiah say that he comes from Arabia.

the chapter 63 according to all jewish scholars in the Talmud say Edom is the land where Messiah comes from.


See the TOB page 889 and this is the translation:

"this portrait of God's vineyard ; subjecting nations to the press of his judgment, will one day become the portrait of the Messiah, according to Jewish Targums written about. Genisis 49/11; Esaias and 63 / 1-2


you can see the map of edomite people by tourself . and it is useless to try to prove that Jesus has came from this country


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom#/...el_830_map.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom#/media/File:Kingdoms_around_Israel_830_map.svg

Quote

it is stupid to believe this version because the rooster always singing in the morning

And I think it's stupid to think that the arrest and trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin was all over in ten minutes. It was already very late in the evening when He was arrested and the whole process would have taken hours.

roosters , they always are. and a rooster does not anything  if it is not crows .

no rooster who say poetry or dance .

what you call a real prophecy is a nonsense .

I can say : tomorrow before the rooster crows four times , I have been drinking my coffee
 and this prophecy will be fulfilled and I will be a prophet


the reality is that saint Peter has assisted to a trial; he was not afraid. and he came to see the miraculous fact : the prisoner had no of Jesus unless his physical appearance


the crucified was not Jesus

If Peter knew that the arrested man was not Jesus, then why would he follow at all? After all, he's just been in a fight with the High Priest's men.... so you'd think the last place he would immediately go would be to the High Priest's palace!  Unless of course he had a very good reason to go - and that reason of course was that his Lord and Messiah had just been arrested.  Case closed on yet another silly argument.

if what you say is a very good reason , why all Apostles did not go to the high priest's palace to assist at what it had foretold in advance?

ASV
Mathiew 26/74:" Then began he to curse and to swear, I know not the man"

CEB

MT26/74:"74 Then he cursed and swore, "I don't know the man!

GW

 Then Peter began to curse and swear with an oath, "I don't know the man!
GNT
 Then Peter said, "I swear that I am telling the truth! May God punish me if I am not! I do not know that man

GSB

Then he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man.

Jub
74 Then he started to curse and to swear with an oath, "I do not know the man!

Kjg
74 Then began he to curse and to swear , saying, I know not the man

LEB
Then he began to curse and to swear with an oath, "I do not know the man

RHE
hen he began to curse and to swear that he knew not the man

NAS

74 Then he began to curse and swear, "I do not know the man!"

NIV
Then he began to call down curses, and he swore to them, “I don’t know the man!

NKJV
4 Then he began to curse and swear, saying, "I do not know the Man!

NRS
Then he began to curse, and he swore an oath, "I do not know the man!


all these versions prove that Peter curse the prisoner and sword he did not know him

he was not Jesus

This is pure unsubstantiated fiction though. Where does it say that Judas took the place of Jesus on the cross?

because your bible are falsified. this is why there are contradictions