Constitution Party VS the "Tea Party"

[Peter]

The Constitution Party is the 3rd largest political party in the U.S. and have had their presidential candidates on the ballots in every state in the nation. In other words the machine is in place.
http://www.constitutionparty.com/

In fact in the last presidential election their candidate for president was almost Alan Keyes, when an irreconcilable difference arose in their primary, that precluded his nomination as their candidate. His was the same difference that I have with the party. (Keyes also posed a serious threat in the primaries against George Bush in 2000)

For folks that are sympathetic to the biggest issues of smaller government and less government spending, of the "Tea Party" non-party, as I am, I would appreciate it if you would weigh in on just where you agree or disagree with the Constitution Party platform.
http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php

Don't discount the chances of a 3rd party winning since Ross Perot got 19% of the popular vote, and only that little because he was sabotaged by the major parties political machines, in the final hours.

[Peter]

By the way, that difference I have with the Constitution Party is the same difference I have with Ron Paul, who I agree with 100% except for the same issue. Indeed he is the only U.S. representative I have financially supported over the last decade and a half or so.

That difference being with their isolationism. Their naivete that suggests that if somehow we isolate ourselves from the rest of the world, and sit passively by as Islam conquers the rest of the world, that somehow Islam will have no interest in conquering us.

This even when the last time the U.S. took that stance as a matter of policy, during Hitler's ascendancy, at least we had the excuse that he hadn't already attacked us on our own soil, which makes Ron Paul and the Constitution Party's view blind as well as naive.
It's wishful thinking.
This is also the difference Alan Keyes had with the Constitution Party.

Anyone that knows anything about the history of Islam, or the nature of the true followers of Mohammed, is well aware that they will not be satisfied until the whole world is subjugated and enslaved to Mohammed's 7t century cult. But that's another subject for the "Jihad" or "Mohammed" section of the forum.