When Mohammed's character is exposed as revealed through the Muslims own books, Muslims will generally try to explain away his behavior as "that's not a genuine accepted hadith" and such, as in this example
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1482.msg6418#msg6418However the very reciters to which they refer like Ishaq and Tabari were not only the earliest chroniclers that lived closest to Mohammed's stint on earth, from which later chroniclers lifted their work, but they were also the ones that created the Islamic
fictional history, that - stunningly - all Muslims still ascribe to today.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1177.0But let's look at this subject through accepted Hadith and the Quran.
Quran Sura 33:50-51 "O prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war ...http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=456.0Bukhari:V5B59N459 "
I entered the Mosque, saw Abu, sat beside him and asked about sex. Abu Said said, 'We went out with Allah's Apostle and we received female slaves from among the captives. We desired women and we loved to do coitus interruptus.'"
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1528.msg5864#msg5864Sahih Muslim Book 8:3431: "
It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified (of menses or delivery) in case she has a husband, her marriage is abrogated after she becomes captive.It doesn't take a genius to understand that
NO WOMAN would
DESIRE to be raped by the very persons responsible for slaughtering her husband, father and/or sons, and selling her mother, sisters and/or daughters off into slavery.
Indeed Mohammed was just as prophesied by Daniel.
Daniel 11:37
Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women....http://www.beholdthebeast.com/women_in_islam.htmMohammed claiming for himself those like
Rayhana bt. Amr,
Safiyah and
Juwairiya.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1528.msg5117#msg5117http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/rapist.htmhttp://www.islam-watch.org/Larry/Muhammad-Massacres-and-Sex-slaves.htmIn an effort to excuse away Mohammed's reprobate behavior, some Muslims actually try to suggest that this rape of captives and selling them into slavery, after slaughtering their husbands, fathers and sons, would be more "humane" than leaving them behind.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=466.msg6426#msg6426However as in the case of the Qurayza for example, would the women and children, rather be raped and pressed into continuing sexual slavery by some reprobate, or sold off into slavery, or might they rather be left behind to struggle, along with their remaining 10 year old and younger sons, tending to the dates, camels and other crops that their hard working, then beheaded/slaughtered, husbands, fathers and older sons had established?
But then, of course, that certainly wouldn't have been an option because Mohammed's primary goal was the theft of all of the property of those hard working Jews, and the money he could receive by selling them off into slavery, let alone the sexual gratification that he and his boys enjoyed through the rape of the women and children. Their property, women and children to be divided up among Mohammed and his boys, with Mohammed even cutting himself in for 1/5 of the action, just like a Mafia Don.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=951.0Of course in Muslim controlled countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan a person can be killed for even bringing a subject like this up for discussion because Islam has never been able to stand the light of truth.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1435.0The same reason that Muslims that come to know the one true God through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, are killed as "apostates".
http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=88d267dba53d454cb1edhttp://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/apostasy.htmThe same reason Bibles are banned in Muslim countries.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL4upLajJScBut does that prevent you from seeing the truth today, as bequeathed to us through Islam's own books, our Muslim could-become brethren?
So far the UN does not control internet content.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=un+blasphemy+law&aq=0&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=un+blasph&gs_rfai=Cd6U6x6o5TKagIpXcygSf2ITwAQAAAKoEBU_Qde5m&fp=cbfdba0083fffc9eThere is still time to seek out the truth, but I don't believe that opportunity will last much longer, once the Muslims are placed in charge of internet content, being appointed the sole arbiters of what constitutes "blasphemy" against their "prophet". U.N. or not, you could die in the next few moments. Are you prepared to stand before our judge?
John 5:22
For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:Do you really believe a good God's "paradise" would amount to a chicken and wine serving bordello, providing multiple virgins to defile, like the children Mohammed and his boys defiled here on earth?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL4upLajJSchttp://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=mohammed+rapist&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CUXllQ685TO3QNJHuzASm9qyBBgAAAKoEBU_QSPBb&fp=cbfdba0083fffc9e