I have to agree with neutral zone. It doesn't matter if he's a JW or not, ......
Of course it does, as that is a cult that follows the 19th century heresy of Charles Taze Russell.
...... and it doesn't matter what bible he's using. They do all pretty much say the same thing!
Sorry my friend, but I have to put the buzzer on you there. The Jehovah's Witnesses heretical "New World Translation" does not say the same thing. Simply look at John 1:1.
Then consider who the uneducated 5 were, that created that heretical translation to conform to Charles Taze Russell's heresy:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4510.0The issue at hand is "the trinity!" And just for the record, I do believe Jesus IS God. But believe that God is greater just like JESUS SAID!
And as I said, your choice your consequences.
I agree with neutralZone on this comment too...
I do not answer to personal questions that are irrelevant to the topic of a thread. Clearly, you are under the misguided impression that simply because you own this website, you have the right to harass posters who come here.
And for the same, likely reason too. And that isn't a "personal question" but is completely germane to discussion in a Christian forum. Deniers of the Trinity and Christ's divinity in this forum are almost always Jehovah's Witnesses. Who also denigrate the scriptures as you did, to the delight of Muslims that widely quote it:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2148.0But we shouldn't be surprised that our experience has been that Jehovah's Witnesses try to hide the fact that they are members of that cult, while introducing themselves with denying the Trinity, and the divinity of Christ, to the delight of Muhammadans whose false "messenger" did the same.
And folks can review the threads for themselves, through your posting history, to judge the veracity of your accusation of harassment.
The only thing you seem to have succeeded in doing is running off good debaters[/b].
First of all this isn't a debate forum, but a discussion forum. When I was in school the state of the art of debate was achieved, when a group on stage could convince a whole room full of spectators that something was true, that they all should have recognized as being patently false.
And no, "good debaters" of scripture would not begin by simply tossing out scriptures that don't fit the heresy they have chosen to follow, that stands outside of 1900 years of universal Christian core doctrine.
I too am leaving and this is my last post.
We understand your aversion to truth completely, as also exhibited in your posts in the other thread:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4680.msg18267#msg18267And in light of the company you keep:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4256.msg16982#msg16982Again, if you are or were a Jehovah's Witness, and are too convicted to admit it, what does that tell you about what you believe? If you aren't a Jehovah's Witness, what does it tell you when you are in league with that cult, as well as Muhammad, in denying the Trinity? Do you suppose it was God that inspired Muhammad to reject and blaspheme the Trinity?
And again, there are excellent resources on line to help JWs overcome Charles Taze Russell. Like the site of this former JW of 35 years, who was an elder for over 20 years:
http://www.towerwatch.com/