Author Topic: "Punish a Muslim Day" - false flag fooling the gullible?  (Read 1180 times)

PeteWaldo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4106
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
"Punish a Muslim Day" - false flag fooling the gullible?
« on: April 08, 2018, 12:36:16 PM »
What were in all likelihood false flag "anonymous leaflets", that were probably distributed by Muslim (Brotherhood?) activists, would seem to have accomplished what would have been the intended goal of perpetuating the ridiculous myth of non-Muslim bigotry and violence against Muslims. At least judging by the, what-would-have-been intended effect of producing hysterical reactions among people that suffer from abject ignorance to Islam, facts, and truth. Those who are ever increasingly duped into the group-think of political correctness, who also apparently have so little capacity for critical thought that the sheeple even leapt into action providing escort services, for what wound up being political cover and comfort for the lie of those poor persecuted Muslims, presumably to aid them in warding off the promised but obviously never-existent assailants. Ridiculous.

Meanwhile, millions of people around the world continue to be the victims of Islamic terrorism, with few voices even speaking out, much less providing escort services for particularly the Christians, Jews, Hindus etc. that continue to be persecuted and slaughtered around so much of the world today, by Muhammad's orthodox followers. Just as has been the case over the last 1400 years.
https://thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=5189.msg19728#msg19728

https://clarionproject.org/punish-muslim-day/
‘Punish A Muslim Day’ Flops
By Elliot Friedland Sunday, April 8, 2018

April 3 was billed as “Punish A Muslim Day.” Instead, non-Muslims in the U.S. and UK rallied in support of Muslims.

Letters advertising “Punish a Muslim Day” were first sent to British Muslim community leaders about a month ago. They later spread to the United States. The letters encouraged citizens to attack or kill Muslims in the street, offering “points” for doing so.

The leaflet awarded 50 points for verbally abusing a Muslim, 100 points for beating up a Muslim and 500 points for killing a Muslim. Many thought the leaflets and the day were a hoax.

London’s Metropolitan Police told the Evening Standard ahead of April 3 there was no “credible information” of planned hate crimes. Yet many Muslims worried about violence or harassment against them and advised each other to be careful on social media. Many Islamic leaders and media outlets shared information about the day widely, warning people to lock their doors and not travel alone.

But instead of the feared pogrom, non-Muslims responded overwhelmingly with empathy, kindness and public displays of inclusivity.

Hardly any anti-Muslim assaults were reported occurring in either the U.S. or the UK. The website Ladbible reported that one Muslim woman was assaulted when someone poured liquid on her.

Instead, thousands of people showed up to support the Muslim community.

Activists organized “Protect a Muslim Day” in which volunteers pledged to escort Muslims who were feeling vulnerable. A different group organized “Love A Muslim Day,” encouraging people to perform acts of kindness to Muslims instead.

At Newcastle Central Mosque in the UK, volunteers formed a human chain around the building to demonstrate solidarity.

The flop of “Punish A Muslim Day” is encouraging. It shows that despite the existence of anti-Muslim bigotry (which Clarion Project will continue to challenge), the vast majority of ordinary people are not frothing at the mouth waiting for the signal to begin lynching minorities. On the contrary, they are decent, law abiding people, many of whom are willing to go out of their way to support and protect those under threat.

What “Punish A Muslim Day” did achieve was to show how a handful of people can sow fear and terror in a community just by maximizing media coverage of a threat, without actually doing anything."
______________________

No, what this ridiculous obviously false flag exercise accomplished, was to further aid Muhammad's followers in their conquest of the non-Islamic world - and I am increasingly under the impression that such an ignorant, gullible and politically correct non-Islamic world that displays such a love of lies, will deserve the ultimate fate that those so sorely deceived are inviting with such open arms.

"Punish A Muslim Day’ Flops".
Of course it did.

Meanwhile the (likely) Muslim author's use of the word "punish" has Muhammadan fingerprints all over it, since it appears 196 time(s) in 184 verse(s) of the Quran's Yusuf Ali translation.

"Hardly any anti-Muslim assaults were reported occurring in either the U.S. or the UK."
Of course there weren't.

There is virtually no such thing as anti-Muslim bigotry when compared to the Muslim slaughter and persecution of non-Muslims. Most informed, thinking people feel sorry for those poor, sorely deluded, souls.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/death_penalty_apostasy.htm

"London’s Metropolitan Police told the Evening Standard ahead of April 3 there was no “credible information” of planned hate crimes."
Of course there wasn't.


Now, short of a mole coming forward and fingering the perpetrators, we can only speculate as to what kind of organization would be responsible for such "anonymous flyers", however consider for a moment who benefited from the positive advertising campaign:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/04/03/british-muslims-defiant-after-leaflets-call-punish-muslim-day/480878002/
"LONDON —  British Muslims vowed to 'keep calm and carry on' Tuesday after anonymous leaflets mailed to addresses across the country called for April 3 to be a day of violence against Muslims.

Police are investigating after leaflets referring to "Punish a Muslim Day" appeared to target several cities with large Muslim populations, including London and Bradford.

"The campaign has caused serious fear within Muslim communities, especially among Muslim women, who often suffer the most from Islamophobia," said the Muslim Council of Britain, which represents a number of Islamic organizations, in a statement.

"The Muslim Council of Britain has been urging vigilance but also recognizes the importance of keeping calm and carrying on, for those who are able," it added."
__________________________

So where did The Muslim Council of Britain come from?

https://counterjihadreport.com/tag/muslim-council-of-britain-mcb/
"Bright’s investigation, however, revealed something quite different from what these Muslim leaders had been telling credulous politicians. The leading recipient of taxpayer funds, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), was in fact run by a violent Islamist group from South Asia, Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), which had close ties with the Muslim Brotherhood and had been involved in the mass killing of Bangladeshis during that nation’s 1971 Independence War.

The government embraced Islamist groups such as the MCB so tightly that, as Bright revealed in 2005, Britain’s foreign secretary, Jack Straw, and MCB leader Iqbal Sacranie (an early supporter of Iran’s fatwa for the killing of Salman Rushdie) even used the same speechwriter. With the MCB in charge, Muslim organizations could not receive government backing for projects without the MCB’s stamp of approval. Naturally, the Islamists prospered. Moderate Muslims, meanwhile, were left without a voice."

The following further displays how ridiculous this all is:
"Letters advertising “Punish a Muslim Day” were first sent to British Muslim community leaders about a month ago."

Now let's put our thinking caps on again. If you were planning a "Punish a Muslim Day", would you first send the letters out to Muslim community leaders thereby providing an advance warning to their communities? For what recipient intended goal, to incite them to punish their own community? Or would you more likely first send them out to groups like skinheads and white supremacists, from whom the allegedly intended response might be expected, with no warning to the Muslim community?

Did anyone in the British intelligence community, ask the Muslim leaders who were supposed to have received these letters, to produce the envelopes that the letters arrived in? Surely the authorities would have wanted to collect all of the forensic information that they could, to track down these dastardly perpetrators. Right? Ya right. If they were printed pages, do you suppose the printers, ink and paper stock in the receiving mosques was checked for a match? Ya right again.