Author Topic: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10  (Read 7332 times)

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« on: September 30, 2010, 12:00:45 PM »
This chat began with my reply to the following channel comment on YouTube. psychlopes fully quoted between [[[[[ and ]]]]] in the first 3 quotes.

Hi
[[[[psychlopes1976
This is a new low for you. You might not have liked Ahmad Deedat, actually I'm sure you hated him, but stooping to actually taking advantage of his illness and death really says a lot about what you stand for. I guess then that all of your "righteous" Christians all over the world died peacefully then? none of them suffered as they died? Really, a new low, even for you.]]]]

Do you believe the First Epistle of John confirms Mohammed was a true prophet, and not antichrist, as Deedat taught?

Before launching into false accusation why not go to the links on the videos? Deedat was in that state for 12 years, never repenting but rather continuing to blaspheme God the whole time, through eye-blinks.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=268.0

http://www.historyofmecca.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_4_tbN-b_A

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2010, 12:01:23 PM »
[[[Get over yourself!!! Blaspheme? you mean telling the truth. Jesus was not God, he was God's prophet, it is you who blaspheme.]]]]]

What you are saying is that you don't understand that you are blaspheming God because you follow a false prophet, and I understand that completely. But the fact remains that you do.
You must reject ALL of the prophets and witnesses as revealed through God's 1600 year record to follow a man revealed through your own books as a murdering, female prisoner violating, thief. Your choice - with eternal consequences.

Quran Sura 33:50-51 "O prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war ...

Bukhari:V5B59N459 "I entered the Mosque, saw Abu, sat beside him and asked about sex. Abu Said said, 'We went out with Allah's Apostle and we received female slaves from among the captives. We desired women and we loved to do coitus interruptus.'"

Sahih Muslim Book 8:3431: "It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified (of menses or delivery) in case she has a husband, her marriage is abrogated after she becomes captive.

A "prophet" whose fleshly "paradise" is even described as a chicken and wine serving bordello.

You bow to the same black stone idol that the pagans did, located in a city that didn't even exist before the 4th century AD, when the pagan immigrants from Yemen settled it.
http://www.historyofmecca.com/

[[[[ And what does any of that have to do with what I said anyway? even if Deedat was wrong, does that excuse your gloating over his ordeal??]]]]]

You didn't even read the words that were being spoken to Deedat did you? Recalling Deedat congratulating Cape Town Muslims for being the most militant Muslims in Africa. You likely can't understand that those of us that live in civil societies don't much appreciate Muslim militants the way that Deedat did.

You preferred to continue to falsely accuse even after it was been explained that you were. That is the way of those with a life outside the Spirit of God in these last days.

2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, FALSE ACCUSERS, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,....

What does scripture say about Deedat's condition?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=268.msg980#msg980

[[[[[ Is that what a true Christian is like??? Like I said, the actions of Christians go along way to show that Christians have no "holy" spirit within them. Just hate and darkness.]]]]

My friend, nothing could be more unchristian that to hate persons - any person.
However Christians are called to hate the THINGS that God hates and love the things that God loves. That's why I hate Mohammed's stand-alone 7th century religion - the EXACT OPPOSITE of that revealed through the Gospel of Jesus Christ - for deceiving so many poor souls.
It was one thing for illiterate 7th century desert dwellers, but I just don't get it in this 21st century information age.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Rdej28pP4

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2010, 12:03:50 PM »
[[[[[[[ And what does any of that have to do with what I said anyway? even if Deedat was wrong, does that excuse your gloating over his ordeal??]]]]]

It doesn't even bother you even a little that Deedat suckered so many of you poor folks into believing a verse of his own creation?
Making you believe the EXACT OPPOSITE of the truth? Listen to the applause of his adoring, Scripture-ignorant minions!

A created verse, I might add, that he repeated on many occasions, precluding it being an error or accident.

But you don't even care that you're fed lies, as long as the lies reinforce what what you have been taught to believe, through the false prophet Mohammed, who was inspired by the father of lies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4rtYAO3UxA

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2010, 12:06:20 PM »
psychlopes - 9-29-10

First of all great job copy/pasting information. Not that I read any of it, I've already read most if not all of what you could ever hope to through at Islam. But it never fails to amuse me how a Christian points the finger at Islam when he/she needs only look at their own bible to see that nothing supposedly Islam teaches hasn't already been taught in the bible. Ever single accusation you hurled at Islam just now is something that YHWH revealed in the Bible. Sex, slaves etc. So, enough with your hypocrisy. Simply saying "the OT" doesn't count anymore isn't an acceptable answer, it's still the same God. So if you believe God allowed men to sell their daughters into slavery and his prophets to have hundreds of wives and (concubines = what their right hands possessed) then you shouldn't dig for dirt in Islam. Just a few hundred years ago, Christianity was the beast being accused of barbarism and oppression. So, you don't get to come now and try to discredit Islam by thinking you can throw a shadow on the "morality" of its teachings, when your Bible contains things that are a thousand folds more immoral.

The problem with Christians is that they can't escape the frailty of their theology which is always shattered when confronted by the strict monotheistic Islamic understanding of God (which happens to agree perfectly with the Jewish understanding of the nature of God) So, finding yourself cornered you start aiming your punches below the belt. 8D. So , please do me a favor.

1- Stop copy/pasting, and start using your own words for a change.
2- Don't throw stones at Islam when the house of Christianity is made of glass.
3- Start discussing theology instead of trying to character-assassinate Islam. It only shows me that you're too insecure about your faith to actually discuss the important matters.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2010, 12:06:46 PM »
psychlopes - 9-29-10 (begins by quoting me)

"It was one thing for illiterate 7th century desert dwellers, but I just don't get it in this 21st century information age."

And I can't believe how an intelligent 21st century person can believe the Bible is the inerrant word of God when it is so blatantly full of discrepancies, contradictions, interpolations (not to mention other things that I believe it contains but I won't say in here so as not to take offensiveness to a new level.)

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2010, 12:07:08 PM »
psychlopes - 9-29-10

You're assuming too much, 1- I haven't looked into your allegations to know yet what verse you're talking about. 2- I don't get my information from Deedat, I used to listen to his lectures and debates for kicks, not knowledge. For knowledge I depend on my own research and wits. 3- You're still avoiding the real issue and clinging to straws, even if Deedat did lie (which I truly doubt) or was wrong (which is possible but I still doubt and wouldn't have been sinister in the first place) even then that has no bearing on why I'm a Muslim or why I believe Christianity is not the true path. 4- I've listened to scores of Christian missionaries suckering their feeble-minded Christian minions into believing lies about Islam, things that would be obvious to anyone who would bother to put the slightest amount of effort into looking up references and what have you ... still, those people are not a reflection on Christianity, so you don't see me going around trying "deceivingly" to discredit Christianity through their false witness. Look at Ergun Caner for instance.

In any case. You're just proving my point further, especially since you didn't have the guts to address the points that I raised in my previous message. So, there's really no point in conversing with the likes of you.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2010, 12:07:44 PM »
[[In any case. You're just proving my point further, especially since you didn't have the guts to address the points that I raised in my previous message.]]]]]

Up until this reply I addressed each of your PMs in order, and plan on continuing to do so.
What point, in what PM that you sent PRIOR to the last one that I addressed, are you accusing me of not addressing?

Now look at the replies that I sent you, and the points that you failed to address, from Mohammed's rape of female prisoners, to his chicken and wine serving bordello that he called paradise.

Tell you what I'll do. I'll start a thread in the forum with your PMs and my replies so we can keep our chat perfectly organized. Are you the psychlopes that ran away from the forum before? If so you already know that I don't need to avoid subjects. That's what's fun about walking in truth.
While even by your own admission, you define Deedat's deception, as entertainment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEfKpgiYgHY

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2010, 12:11:42 PM »
[[[[You're just proving my point further, especially since you didn't have the guts to address the points that I raised in my previous message. So, there's really no point in conversing with the likes of you.]]]]

Now we can keep it organized and outside of this dark alley of personal messaging and into the light so you don't have to make any more accusations the answers to which will be readily apparent.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1860.0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1QPjbzdnlo

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2010, 10:33:59 AM »
Since psyops left the YouTube conversation 5 days ago, and didn't as yet accept my invitation and log in here, I will go ahead and address the rest of his PMs now.

First of all great job copy/pasting information.

Please read the PMs above. What in the above is copy and pasted besides verses? Would you have preferred I create my own fake Quran and Hadith verses, or my own fake Bible verses, the way that Ahmed Deedat did?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_4_tbN-b_A

Not that I read any of it, ......

So you accuse copy and pasting regarding what I wrote, while admitting that you didn't even read it to begin with.

........ I've already read most if not all of what you could ever hope to through at Islam.

Somehow I have my doubts that you have read much of it, because if you had, you wouldn't hardly be able to remain a Muslim except purely through fear that you might be killed by your own father, loose your job, be disinherited, loose your family, and be rejected or even killed by the rest of your Islamic community.
What do you know about the history of Mecca that isn't so-called "tradition" that was penned by Mohammed's followers in the 7th and 8th centuries?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.0

But it never fails to amuse me how a Christian points the finger at Islam when he/she needs only look at their own bible to see that nothing supposedly Islam teaches hasn't already been taught in the bible.

Which is, of course, a preposterous suggestion since Mohammed WAS and taught the EXACT OPPOSITE of the Gospel and Muslims must REJECT ALL of the prophets and witnesses as revealed in the Old and New Testaments in order to follow the 23 year 7th century record of Mohammed.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=148.0

Ever single accusation you hurled at Islam just now is something that YHWH revealed in the Bible. Sex, slaves etc. So, enough with your hypocrisy.

Islamic, Jewish and Muslim scholars consider each of our books to be a progressive revelation of God to mankind. As mankind changed, God increasingly revealed Himself to us. For example

"By Mohammed's day, 1,500 years had passed since any Hebrew prophet was described in the Old Testament as using a sword in the service of God. Neither Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Micah, Amos, Malachi nor any other later Hebrew prophet is described as using the sword or prescribing its use."
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=935.0

The problem is that in Islam, that progression moves in the exact opposite direction. Mohammed's earlier more peaceful "revelations" are abroaged by his later revelations calling for fighting against non-Muslims.
The Mohammedan calendar doesn't even begin until Mohammed picked up the sword and began his imperialistic slaughter, theft and prisoner rape.

Sura 33:50-51 "O prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war ...
(Sahih Muslim) Book 8:3431: "It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified (of menses or delivery) in case she has a husband, her marriage is abrogated after she becomes captive.  BOOK 8. KITAB AL-NIKAH
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=456.0

Simply saying "the OT" doesn't count anymore isn't an acceptable answer, ......

I agree.

...... it's still the same God.

YHWH is certainly not the same God as Mohammed's "Allah", as revealed through Mohammed's STAND-ALONE 7th century record, and reprobate behavior.

So if you believe God allowed men to sell their daughters into slavery and his prophets to have hundreds of wives and (concubines = what their right hands possessed) then you shouldn't dig for dirt in Islam.

But slavery wasn't made illegal in the Middle east until the last half-century and then only because of outside pressure.
It will always be Islamic because of Mohammed's capture and violation of female prisoners and selling off of captives to purchase camels and swords to continue his imperialistic slaughter.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=456.0

Just a few hundred years ago, Christianity was the beast being accused of barbarism and oppression.

The Roman Church murdered Jews, Muslims, AND CHRISTIANS. Please don't confuse the actions of men as being Christian, when they are exactly contrary to the Gospel and new covenant.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=537.0

John 13:35 By this shall all [men] know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.

So, you don't get to come now and try to discredit Islam by thinking you can throw a shadow on the "morality" of its teachings, when your Bible contains things that are a thousand folds more immoral.

Islam discredits itself. No need to view Islam on a moral or Scriptural basis, to understand it is a 7th century fictional fraud, when there is not a shred of historical or archaeological evidence that suggests that Mecca ever existed before immigrants from Yemen settled it in around the 4th century AD.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.0

The problem with Christians is that they can't escape the frailty of their theology which is always shattered when confronted by the strict monotheistic Islamic understanding of God (which happens to agree perfectly with the Jewish understanding of the nature of God) ......

As well as Christian, of course, contrary to what you have been trained to believe.

Mark 12:29 ... The Lord our God is one Lord: ... 32 ... for there is one God; and there is none other but he:

...... So, finding yourself cornered you start aiming your punches below the belt. 8D. So , please do me a favor.

1- Stop copy/pasting, and start using your own words for a change.

Repeating his prior false accusation. Perhaps hoping that repeating it will somehow make it true.

2- Don't throw stones at Islam when the house of Christianity is made of glass.

Increasingly I find that when Muslims come to understand that they have to divorce themselves from history, archology, geography and scripture, to adopt the mind of a 7th century illiterate, in order to follow Mohammed and his "Allah", their gut instinct is to blaspheme YWHW as a result.

3- Start discussing theology instead of trying to character-assassinate Islam.

It is YOUR OWN BOOKS that "character-assinate" Mohammed, and thereby his STAND-ALONE 7th century religion.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=456.0

It only shows me that you're too insecure about your faith to actually discuss the important matters.

On the contrary. It shows that through the 1600 year record that God gave us through ALL of His prophets and witnesses, that His people have followed for 3500 years, I am desperate for the 1.5 billion people in the world today that reject that record because they have been trained to follow Mohammed instead.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2010, 10:51:06 AM »
psychlopes - 9-29-10

You're assuming too much, 1- I haven't looked into your allegations to know yet what verse you're talking about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_4_tbN-b_A
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=335.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKMMr4lZx2E

Does the John's First Epistle confirm that Mohammed was a true prophet, and that he was not antichrist?
Do you agree with Deedat in this claim?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=273.0


Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2010, 01:21:40 PM »
bump

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2010, 09:51:28 AM »
[[[[I'm not interested of taking this conversation to another level. Especially one where I become on the defensive with accusations pouring in and I'm just typing away trying to keep up with someone who's made a career of bashing Islam.]]]]]

It is Mohammed's stand-alone 7th century religion that bashes itself, through your own books.

[[[[[ The point that I talked about which you didn't reply to was how do you feel justified pointing the finger at Islam with all the atrocities in the Bible, ........]]]]]

There are some very harsh lessons regarding disobedience to God detailed in the Old Testament, through accounts of one-time historical events. Many are purely accounts of historical events, that do not indicate God's tacit approval or disapproval. A few are passages are metaphorical. About 1/3 of Scripture is prophecy.

Why don't you explain to me where God INSTRUCTS His people to follow RULES REQUIRING imperialistic conquest against others? Such as the ungodly - indeed black-hearted reprobate Satanic violence - of Mohammed and the Roman Church, for two examples.

"By Mohammed's day, 1,500 years had passed since any Hebrew prophet was described in the Old Testament as using a sword in the service of God. Neither Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Micah, Amos, Malachi nor any other later Hebrew prophet is described as using the sword or prescribing its use."

If you would like to discuss those historical accounts individually I will try to help though I am not as well versed, and a genuinely faithful Jew would be a much better choice.
Muslims often point out that children were killed - because Islam is of the flesh - so their eyes don't see well past this world, and even when they try to look past this world they see a carnal heaven of flesh and fornication.
But all innocent people who died or were killed throughout history are with the Lord.
Where would those babies be, if they had grown up to be idol worshipers who sacrificed their children to idols like their parents, for example?

It's important to understand that it was mankind that changed from our little more than desert dwelling nomad stage, to the quite sophisticated societies of the first century (Google - antikythera mechanism - for an eyepopper), when the revelation of God's record to mankind through His prophets and witnesses was brought to a close.

You don't seem to think that punishment for disobedience to God by following a stand-alone 7th century false prophet that WAS and taught the EXACT OPPOSITE of Jesus Christ, the Messiah, apply to you. Those Old Testament lessons are lost on you.
But you will no longer be able to plead ignorance when you stand in judgment before our Creator, because you not only reject YHWH of the Jews and Christians, but in your case continue to blaspheme His record. And follow a false prophet that even orders his phony "Allah's" curse on us. You will no longer be judged according to innocence, but will be held fully accountable because you reject God in full knowledge.

2Peter 2:21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known [it], to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

[[[[....... and most particularly the OT. ]]]]]

Not most particularly, since there IS NO example in the Gospel. The most violent thing that Jesus did was overturn the tables of the moneychangers at the temple.

[[[[[If you were interested to discuss theology I would gladly discuss it in any venue.]]]]

Let's go to the forum start with the basis as to HOW to view God's revelation to mankind, since Hebrew/Christian and Muslim scholars understand our respective books to be God revealing Himself in a progression, or increasingly, to mankind.
Indeed Mohammed declared it in one of his revelation.
The primary difference is that the progressive nature of Mohammed's "revelation" runs in the exact opposite direction of the God of the Jews and Christians. That is, from more peaceful, to the final revelations that call his followers to violence.

[[[[[ Accusations however, from a person who believes in a holy book like the Bible ......]]]]]

Sure. God's people had it all wrong for 1500 years, until A SINGLE "prophet" came along 500 years after the Scriptures were closed, to contradict all of the prophets and witnesses of God's 1600 year record. A "prophet" who never had a fulfilled prophecy, who never performed a single miracle, who not a single person ever heard his "Allah" or Gabriel give a revelation to. A "prophet" who WAS and taught the EXACT OPPOSITE of Jesus Christ

[[[[[...... is not something I'm interested in.]]]]]

You can't afford to be interested in Scripture, while following Mohammed too. One quickly learns that ONE MUST CHOOSE, rather than pretending that Mohammed's STAND-ALONE religion has anything to do with the God of the Jews and Christians. I attached a video in an effort to spark your interest, in something that the church can't even see, because of unsound eschatology. Maybe you can see where they can't.

You're not interested because you never tried to understand the Bible. Nor can you expect to understand the things of the Spirit of God until you repent and ask Jesus to come into your life and help you with it.

1Cr 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.

I just want to make it clear that Mohammed's STAND-ALONE religion has nothing to do with the God of the Jews and Christians, which you already know, since you realize you have to reject ALL of the prophets and witnesses of God as revealed in His 1600 year record.

[[[[[ It's hypocrisy to say the least. Nothing you can throw at the prophet of Islam in terms of "suspect morality" hasn't already been topped by something in the Bible.]]]]]

Why not begin by showing me which prophet of the Bible engaged in the rape of female prisoners, and then from where in the Bible Mohammed received instructions to rape prisoners, 1500 years after those types of Old Testament HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS, at the beginnings of God's revelation to mankind, ended.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=456.0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdi8PzPWrb8

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2010, 09:54:39 AM »
[[[[[And since you made this into an accusation of the "You're a coward" sorts by hinting to me "forfeiting" the discussion, here's what we can do, we'll keep on discussing here in PMs, and you can feel free to post my replies and your to that forum of yours.]]]]]

The problem is that it is too hard to keep track of a conversation. There is no quote function. Live links are not possible. There is no easy accounting of a conversation panel by panel arranged in order.
This is a venue that results in the kind of confusion that Mohammed's religion has always depended on to survive.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2010, 10:11:13 AM »
[[[P.S. If you wish to be fair and for me to be able to respond to your allegations, then at least do me the courtesy of giving me Hadith references ......]]]]]

I always include book, chapter and verse references, so that Muslims can be fully aware that it is their own books, not my words.

[[[[[...... that I can follow., I read the Hadiths in Arabic - their original language, and when we reference a hadith, we reference the collection and then the volume then the name of the book (chapter) then the title of the secon, giving me and ID number doesn't help me, or at least makes my research time considerably longer than I'm willing to invest.]]]]]

To my knowledge I haven't yet cited a sura or hadith that I haven't first found myself at USC or Islam City or other online Quran and Hadith sites. Unfortunately none do a very good job of making it so I can simply give you a link to the specific verse, the way that Blue Letter Bible does, for example.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/index.cfm

But then I think part of the reason is they don't want to make Islam's books easily accessible to individual verses that honestly reveal the truth of it.
Try these as samples to confirm you can find the verses.

Quran Sura 33:50-51 "O prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war ...

Bukhari:V5B59N459 "I entered the Mosque, saw Abu, sat beside him and asked about sex. Abu Said said, 'We went out with Allah's Apostle and we received female slaves from among the captives. We desired women and we loved to do coitus interruptus.'"

Sahih Muslim Book 8:3431: "It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified (of menses or delivery) in case she has a husband, her marriage is abrogated after she becomes captive.

[[[[ The English translation doesn't help me refute your accusations as I wouldn't know whether the translation is correct or not.]]]]]

USC cites 3 Quran translations simultaneously. You might agree that you couldn't do a better job than the 3 averaged together.

[[[[[So, if you're up to this, repeat your post with the appropriate references, and then give me a day or two to get around to address them. But of course, first, I expect you to answer my question about the hypocrisy of pointing the finger at Islam with all the things that the bible says prophets of all did, .......]]]]]

I answered to this previously and will continue to do so.
We can each ask questions of the other in turn.

[[[[......... and the things that God in the bible condoned and commanded.]]]]]

Why do you prefer PM confusion to an orderly and far superior forum format? What are you afraid of besides an easily accessible full account of our conversion?
You've already seen how well the format works last year.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with psychlopes - 9-29-10
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2010, 10:53:32 AM »
[[["This is a venue that results in the kind of confusion that Mohammed's religion has always depended on to survive"

See, these are the kinds of statements that makes me really dislike taking this further.]]]]

I understand that my manner is perhaps a little too matter of fact for some. I will admit that I have been somewhat hardened by the constant blasphemy for about 2 years now.
But what about what is said is incorrect? Why don't Muslims that care even a whit about Islam come to the forum to defend it? Most of the top 10 posters have been Muslims. Not one has ever been thrown out. All we required is EXCHANGE. Two Muslims came in about the same time and tried to lard the forum with copy and paste, without engaging in support of it, so I moved the extra spam posts aside to storage until they finished defending the copy and paste that they had already put in the forum. The posts still remain in storage. That is the closest to anything that could be considered censored - and it wasn't.
Knowing you the little I do I think you would agree that folks should expect to support what they advance.
A couple of Christians recently tried the same thing. Posting without even being able to begin to explain the material on the links they were attempting to advance.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1870.0

Why are Bibles banned in Muslim countries? Why are Muslims that come to Jesus Christ killed as apostates?

[[[[[ First of all, you obviously made a career .........]]]]]

Since my websites and all of my ministry neither solicit nor accept donations, it could hardly be characterized as a "career". I am however engaged mostly full-time in helping Muslims overcome Mohammed.

[[[[........ or this, whereas I'm an ordinary Muslim with relatively recent interest in comparative religion. Much better Muslims than I have debated you Christians in all kinds of venues. So please, stop trying to insult me with your language, all you're achieving is making me think less of Christians and Christianity. And I can make the same kind of statement you made, Christianity depends on confusion and mysticism to defend itself. Your only leverage is that I believe in God, and that the Bible is still from God .......]]]]]

That His people have followed for 3500 years.

[[[[[....... even if I believe it to be corrupt.]]]]

I will look forward to learning as to why your opinion differs from Mohammed's in that matter.

[[[[ Had I been an atheist you'd have been the one on the defensive position, and you'd be torn to pieces.

I still haven't read your other message, but I will later today.]]]]]

The forum would sure make things easier to keep track of. We can even link to prior posts that we make when we want to recall a portion of our conversation.
What did you find objectionable with your last experience in the forum?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=534.0