Ahmed Deedat on Muhammad Antichrist
link for this redo coming today
http://youtu.be/BLnEZ4nUhoU"The question addressed to Mr. Deedat, 'Through your knowledge of the Moslem faith, can you vouch for the fact that Mohammed was not antichrist?'"
Deedat: "Uh in short the question is whether Muhammad was not the Antichrist."
How can it be indeed, that Muhammad could have been one and the same with the one-eyed boogeyman or "Dajjal", of Muhammad's own overactive imagination? So Deedat begins by not even understanding what he was asked, which was whether Muhammad was antichrist - not whether Muhammad was "The Antichrist".
There have been many antichrists ever since the first century.
1 John 2:18 .....ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists.....
Just as Muhammad and his followers are, according to the holy scriptures:
Quran Surah 19:88 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" 89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/islam_is_antichrist.htm1 John 2:22 .....
He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and
the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father.....
While Deedat was met with raucous applause by his wishful, adoring, bible-ignorant minions, tragically Deedat's words are demonstrably, patently, horrifically false. Muhammad's followers have only been fooled into parroting lip service that they believe in Jesus. Thus Muhammad's followers join most atheists and agnostics, in believing that Jesus existed, because the historical record is too compelling not to believe that. But the fact is that Muhammad's followers are compelled to reject the crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ - and thus reject the sin-atoning blood of the sacrifice of the Lamb of God - as an article of their faith in Muhammad alone.
Surah 4:157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-
In Jesus' own words: Matthew 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
In John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Thus it should be painfully obvious, that anyone who rejects the whole subject of the Gospel, does not "believe in Jesus". In other words, no Muslim is a Muslim if he believes in Jesus, through faith in the shed blood of the Messiah. Yet there has not been a single Christian over the last nearly 2,000 years, that has not believed that Christ was crucified, died, and was resurrected from the dead.
The Quran obviously cannot be a holy book, because the false prophet Muhammad contradicted the 1600 year record of the one true God YHWH to mankind, and proclaimed the exact opposite of the whole subject of the Gospel, while blaspheming and denying the Son of God.
It would seem Deedat wasn't much better versed regarding Islam, than he was Christianity. Muslims are specifically prohibited from believing that any messenger, could be "one of the mightiest messengers", as Deedat suggested.
Quran 4.152 And those who believe in Allah and His Messengers and make no distinction between any of them (Messengers), We shall give them their rewards; and Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
Perhaps Deedat missed the "rewards" of the chicken and wine serving bordello of Muhammad's overactive imagination that he called "paradise". The reason for Muhammad's prohibition of making distinctions between "messengers" becomes obvious when we compare Jesus the "Christ" or the "anointed one" - the sinless Messiah - to Muhammad's sinful behavior as revealed through Islam's own books.
None of which beliefs of course matter since Muhammad's followers are compelled to disbelieve the crucifixion, death and resurrection of Christ - the whole subject of the Gospel - while denying the Son of God.
Deedat did a near perfect job of quoting that verse straight out of the King James Version of the Bible.
1John 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
And as the verse indicates, it is a test of spirits.
Deedat: "It continues: 'The spirit that confesseth that Jesus is the Christ is of God.'"
It does not "continue" with that verse, because that verse does not exist in the First Epistle of John, or any other book of the Bible. Nor can Deedat's phony bible verse be chalked up to some kind of an error, because he repeated his false verse and preposterous argument in other venues, such as this one:
Let alone that the test in the verses he was alluding to is a test of SPIRITS - just as it says. Here is the actual verse that follows:
1John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
Here Deedat combines the term "spirit" and "prophet" as if those terms, or the Koine Greek "prophetes" and "pneuma", were synonymous, equivalent or interchangeable, which of course anyone who has ever glanced at the definitions would realize is patently absurd.
As anyone with eyes can see it doesn't say that at all. Deedat's wishful lie is nothing more than an even more false rewrite, of the already phony verse, of Deedat's own creation. What it SAYS is ".....the SPIRIT that confesseth....." not ".....the prophet that confesseth....". This test is used to deliver folks from unclean spirits and demons. It is the SPIRIT that is commanded to make that confession - not the person - because God precluded unclean spirits and demons from being able to make that confession. A primer on the subject of unclean spirits and demons that cause some people great distress, is Neil Anderson's "Bondage Breaker", available free online.
http://selfdefinition.org/hearing-voices/Neil-T-Anderson-The-Bondage-Breaker.pdfIt's 1400 years too late to "try the spirit" that met Muhammad in the cave of Hira, that he correctly identified as a demon, when he felt as though it tried to squeeze the life out of him three times. The time to try the spirit was when Muhammad: "sometimes growled like a camel, foamed at his mouth, and streamed with perspiration" "during his revelations". No angels in scripture are revealed as ever having been responsible for causing such distress, however demonic possession can of course be manifest in such ways.
Christians do apply it to spirits - not persons - such as when delivering someone from deceptive unclean spirits or demons that pose as the Holy Spirit. By Deedat's misunderstanding, any self-deluded, or unclean spirit deceived, falsely prophesying individual that comes along, that proclaims that Jesus is the Christ, would be a true prophet simply for having made the claim - whether Joseph Smith, Ellen White, or Arnold Murray. Indeed even a Satanist could honestly believe and proclaim that "Jesus is the Christ", and according to Deedat's delusion, that would make him a true prophet!
Because Deedat's phony test isn't a test for Muhammad at all. However blessedly, there is a very specific test of persons that is also found in the First Epistle of John, that even uses the phrase "that Jesus is the Christ", that Deedat borrowed for the false verse of his own creation.
1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [(but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also].
That obviously could not be more clear. Whosoever denies the Son of God is antichrist.
Surah 9.29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Thus Muhammad and his followers are exactly, specifically and undeniably antichrist. That's 1.5 billion antichrists in Islam alone - 1/4 of mankind in the world today - that number not even including atheists and other antichrists.
Muhammad's followers must necessarily conform to the very definition of antichrist as an article of their faith in the false prophet Muhammad alone. Indeed so much so in fact, that for a Muslim to confess that Jesus is the Son of God, or even to pray in Jesus' name, would constitute the most egregious - and only unforgivable sin of "shirk" - in Muhammad's "religion". As opposed to child rape or cold blooded mass murder, for example, which may be forgiven.
Yet in the same First Epistle of John that Deedat quoted from we read:
1John 4:15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.
So according to Islam's unforgivable sin of "shirk", each and every Christian over the last nearly 2,000 years, has died in a state of committing the only unforgivable sin, and was thus condemned forever. Talk about the EXACT OPPOSITE!
Please visit "The Unforgivable Sin of Shirk" page at BrotherPete.com for more, in Muhammad's follower's own words.
Thus Islam is to Christianity, as the negative is to a photograph. We could chalk Deedat's Greek sophist styled entertaining up to sheer buffoonery, if it weren't for Islamic blasphemy against the one true God YHWH and the 1600 year record of scripture, that Deedat chronically lied about. But it isn't my opinion that made him a liar. This also from the First Epistle of John Deedat quoted from:
1John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
Here are a couple more verses that use that term "that Jesus is the Christ" that Deedat borrowed to create his own phony hybrid verse:
John 20:31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.
Since confessing that Jesus is the Son of God and even praying in Jesus' name, constitute Muhammad's only unforgivable sin, that verse certainly further demonstrates Muhammad to have been antichrist.
The following verse is, once again, from the First Epistle of John:
1John 5:1 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him.
That one certainly doesn't support Muhammadan Islam.
Sura 19:88 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" 89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
Thus far from being some random one-off religion, Islam is revealed as the only anti-a-specific-religion, cult on earth.
The fruit provides a very compelling argument. Like the perpetrators of nearly 20,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world just since 9-11. Doing their best of follow one of the most consummate - and conveniently self-admitted - terrorists in the history of mankind.
Sura 8:12 I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them
Indeed the only thing that distinguished the Boston Marathon Islamic terror attack, from the other 20,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world just since 9-11, is that it happened in the U.S.
Please visit the "Jihad, Conquest, Terrorism" page at BrotherPete.com for much more on Jihad.
Yet Christians are commanded to:
Matthew 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Charity? Islamic charity primarily goes to Muslims while Christian charity is generally extended to all of humanity. I don't remember reading about the wealthy oil-rich Islamic countries or Islamic charities, coughing up two nickels worth of aid to help the tsunami victims, even though many of them were Muslims. Compare Islamic charities - wherever they are - with Christian charities like Mercy Ships, Compassion International, the Salvation Army or the Christian groups that purchase African's freedom, after they have been captured and pressed into slavery by Muslims. Indeed what we repeatedly learn about Islamic so-called "charities" in the U.S. is that they are fronts for funneling money to the hands of Islamic terrorists. Not unlike the so-called "Palestinian" so-called "charities", that naive westerners are duped into funding, that finance Islamic terrorism and murder of non-Muslim Israelis.
Unlike Muslim drunkards that Deedat admitted: "we have our drunkards that might put many a Christian under the table", there is no such thing as a Christian drunkard.
1Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
But Deedat's wishful condemnations are typical of folks in the world and outside the Spirit of God. Judging Christians and measuring Christianity by false posers, rather than by the Gospel. Many judging Christianity, through some black-hearted Popes of the Middle Ages or the like, rather than through the Gospel that defines us. So there is really no such thing as a Christian drunkard. Any drunkard that proclaims himself to be a Christian, has only deceived himself into believing he is Christian.
Since Muslims believe they are born Muslims, self identification as a "Muslim" is simply a way to classify oneself in a group of people or "community" as Deedat put it. Regarding a non-Muslim becoming a Muslim:
"Three honest recitations of the shahadah in Arabic is all that is required for a person to convert to Islam according to most traditional schools (madh'hab)."
Thus typical of other Islamic "performance" for their "Allah", once a non-Muslim parrots the shahadah they become a Muslim (and technically eligible for the death penalty for apostasy, if they leave). But becoming a Christian is a very different matter:
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
Thus conversion to Christianity consists of a conversion of the heart. Once we are transformed we are called out of the kingdoms of this world and enter the kingdom of God. Called out of the kingdoms of the world, that Muhammad's Islamic kingdom, lusts after conquest and subjugation of. Christians are filled with the Holy Spirit, which is Jesus in us and we in Him, and are thereafter are convicted by the Spirit for such vice as drunkenness.
And let's not forget one of the lowest rates of adultery - at least among Muslim women.
While Muslim women are stoned for adultery, Muslim men are allowed up to four wives and concubines, and even temporary marriage contracts. In some cases for periods as brief as overnight. Google "travelers marriage" or Nikah Misyar Mutah. Let alone that to switch wives all a Muslim has to do is say "I divorce you" three times and a wife is disposed of. Today being accomplished in some Islamic countries even by text message.
What kind of fruit were Muhammad and his followers? After beheading the innocent Jewish farm boys of the Banu Qurayza, and their dads and grandpas - who never struck a blow - while stealing the fruit of their labor of generations, Muhammad and his followers sexually abused and enslaved their little sisters, moms and grandmothers, while selling the discards off into slavery to buy camels and swords.
Bukhari Book 93, #506: Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured some females and intended to have sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. The Prophet said, "It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection." Qaza'a said, "I heard Abu Sa'id saying that the Prophet said, 'No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it."
So Muhammad's true followers are simply doing the same, in the Islamic conquest of the Sudan for example, as Muhammad and his followers did during the imperialistic conquest of the Islamic First Jihad:
"Eyewitness accounts detailing the [Muslim] militia attacks are horrifying. "They killed my 3-year-old son right in front of my eyes," one father from West Darfur said. Since last fall, women have reported more than 500 rapes. Three women said five [Muslim] militiamen beat and raped them last August. The women said, 'After they abused us, they told us that now we would have Arab babies. And, if they would find any [more] women, they would rape them again to change the color of their children.'"
His followers completing the sex act, while sexually abusing prisoners, just as Muhammad prescribed.
Bukhari Book 62, #137: Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Apostle about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection."
So should we be surprised that Deedat's buffoonery was embellished with even more lies? Was Hitler a Christian?
Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second [is] like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Adolph Hitler: December 13th, 1941 “Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless…â€
July 11th – 12th, 1941 “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity….[an] invention of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity.â€
But who was actually engaged hand in hand with Hitler toward their shared goal of genocide of Jews? The Islamic Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini.
In the following photo Amin el-Husseini gives the ole' "sieg heil" to the Islamic troops in the service of Nazi Germany, toward the shared goal of genocide of Jews, including several SS divisions and an Islamic panzer division in Hitler's army.
Because it's their job: Sahih Bukhari B52 #177 Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "the Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
The last day is so important in Islam it is often mentioned simultaneously with belief in Allah as in "believe in Allah and the last day".
At the end of this video is an excerpt from the movie "Obsession" with more on Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem.
Thus it becomes painfully obvious, that Deedat only fooled his bible-ignorant followers into believing that the First Epistle of John confirms Muhammad was not antichrist, through a fake bible verse of his own creation. Through just the few verses revealed thus far we can see that the First Epistle of John specifically exposes Muhammad as an antichrist false prophet. Indeed the First Epistle of John may well be the most Islam exposing book in all of scripture. Let's further check the veracity of Deedat's assertion, against even more verses, and see just what the First Epistle of John indicates Muhammad was, from the same King James Version that Deedat quoted from:
Please join us for discussion in the Islam-Christian Forum at the first link in the video drop-down menu, and for a link to the movie "Obsession" click on the second link below the video. Please also visit IslamAndTheTruth.com for an online New Testament geared toward Muslims, BrotherPete.com for more on Islam, BeholdTheBeast.com for Islam in bible prophecy, HistoryOfMecca.com for more on that subject, and IsraelinBibleProphecy.com for more on that subject.
May God bless you and lead those so sorely deceived to overcome the false prophet Muhammad, and may He lead us all in all truth.
John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Luke 11:9 And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. 10 For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.
