Best read on web page that contains active links:
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/blasphemy_laws.htm"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." ~ George Washington
From CNS on Hillary Clinton's Obama Administration effort:
"'The OIC has hit on a winning strategy to get Western countries to break away from their commitment to free speech by repackaging blasphemy as hate speech and free speech as the manifestation of "intolerance,"' George Washington University professor of public interest law Jonathan Turley warned in a column this week."
"'Although the OIC and the Obama administration claim fealty to free speech, the very premise of the meeting reveals a desire to limit it,' he argued."
"In her address Wednesday, Clinton referred briefly to criticism of the talks.
'Now I know that some in my country and elsewhere have criticized this meeting and our work with all of you. But I want to make clear that I am proud of this work, and I am proud to be working with every one of you.'"
Death Penalty for Blasphemy (URL)
The death penalty for blasphemy by statute is of course perfectly consistent with the death penalty for "apostasy" by statute, of many OIC Islamic countries today, in the cradle of Muhammad's anti-religion. That is, Muslim State's statutes providing for the murder of their own formerly Muslim citizens, who come to know the love of the one true God through a relationship with Jesus Christ. The following lists the penalty in some OIC member States for "blasphemy", or what we in the west used to know as free speech. A small sampling of Islamic countries' penalty for "blasphemy":
Afghanistan (member OIC) - death penalty
Algeria (member OIC) - 10 years of imprisonment and a fine
Bangladesh - so far, "Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina rejected calls for new laws.....demanding death penalty for people involved in blasphemy."
Egypt (member OIC) - death penalty
Kuwait (member OIC) - death penalty
Nigeria - "Nigeria prohibits blasphemy by section 204 of its Criminal Code and by permitting Sharia courts to operate in some states.[52][53] Vigilantism frequently usurps the jurisdiction of the courts.[54]"
Pakistan (member OIC) - death penalty
Saudi Arabia (member OIC) - death penalty
Sudan (member OIC) - imprisonment, a fine (up to 8 million Sudanese pounds for having sold a book), and a maximum of forty lashes
Turkey (member OIC) - 1-3 years
UAE (member OIC) - up to the judge, but based on what they do to tourists that are victims of rape.....
Yemen (member OIC) - death penalty
For more, simply search country names like - indonesia penalty for blasphemy - (5 years). Please check the list at this link and consider how long it might be - unless you and many others become directly and heavily involved - before such speech laws come to a neighborhood near you if the Muslim Brotherhood and their western dhimmis prevail. What about your heirs?
Global Speech Regulation (URL)
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expresses her pride in working with OIC Islamic states toward speech laws that would run roughshod over our constitution, while a young Christian mother of five has been sentenced to death in OIC member Pakistan for a false accusation of so-called "blasphemy", lodged against her by a group of anti-Christian Muslim bigots:
"Asia’s case dates back to June 2009 when she was asked to fetch water while out working in the fields. But a group of Muslim women labourers objected, saying that as a non-Muslim, she should not touch the water bowl.
A few days later the women went to a local cleric and alleged that Asia made derogatory remarks about the Prophet Mohammed."
From WorldWatch Monitor: "Tensions are high in the Punjabi city of Gojra after a court sentenced a Christian man, Sajjad Masih, to life imprisonment for blasphemy, only weeks before the fourth anniversary of an outbreak of extreme violence against Christians in the same city."
"Now, even as local Islamists demanded that Masih’s life imprisonment sentence be exchanged for the death penalty, a further blasphemy case was lodged on July 20; police arrested a Christian couple who were sent to jail the next day."
"On July 13, the Gojra Additional Sessions Court convicted Masih of committing blasphemy under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code; for insulting Muhammad, which carries the death penalty.
Masih had been accused of sending blasphemous text messages in a case first lodged in December 2011. Despite an absence of evidence, the court sentenced Masih to life imprisonment (25 years in Pakistan)."
"In August 2009, seven Christians from the same family were killed – six burned to death – and more than 100 Christian homes set alight by angry Muslims, again over an accusation of blasphemy."
Secretary Clinton said she was "proud to be working with every one" of the OIC countries toward global speech control laws, in spite of her being sworn to "support and defend the Constitution" of the United States. Proudly seeking to join the U.S., with State sponsored murderers in the "Organisation of Islamic [unilateral] Cooperation", toward imposing Islamic speech regulation on U.S. citizens and around the world. Since it is unreasonable to suggest that Hillary Clinton could be ignorant to the fact that several OIC Islamic countries impose the death penalty for speech that is deemed inappropriate, is it reasonable to believe that her capacity for critical thought could be so compromised, as to prevent her from understanding where all such satanically inspired statutes would necessarily eventually lead to? Our first amendment having been preserved from attack, by those that would outlaw speech that doesn't agree with their own, is the very reason that these rights enjoyed protection for over 200 years, from dhimmis like republican Lindsey Graham, and democrat Hillary Clinton's efforts to join the U.S. with Muhammad's followers to begin the process of tearing them down.
Quran Surah 19:88 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" 89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
Now that's antichrist blasphemy, right out of the mouth of Muhammad himself!
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
The ultimate goal commanded of Muhammad's antichrist followers, that is being accomplished with the help of the dhimmis they have duped, could not have been more clearly stated:
Quran Surah 9.29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Bukhari, V1 B2 #24 Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle.....
What kind of world will your kids inherit if a Godless U.N. and Islam's dhimmis in the U.S. government, are put in charge of controlling speech, with beheading knife and Quran and Hadith wielding Muslims as the ultimate arbiters? What have you been doing to protect your heir's future from that fate? We can all certainly rest assured that the ultimate arbiters wouldn't be the taqiyyah peddling, Quran and Hadith ignoring, western hypocrite peacenick dissimulators.
Far from those Islamic countries death penalty for speech being out of order, it is the obvious and natural conclusion of all attempts to regulate blasphemy, through which the truth must yield to lies. What reason is there to even outlaw so-called "hate speech"? Doing so deprives the rest of us of the regular opportunity to witness the black-hearted evil, to sheer buffoonery, displayed by folks who hate others, while offering an object lesson and teachable moment for our kids - like the spectacle of Jew-hating anti-Zionists that wear sheets and pointy hats!
As explained: Matthew 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Speech regulation would also deprive those who hate, the opportunity to display the condition of their hearts, right out there on their sleeves. And parents the opportunity to point out to our kids that when a person expresses hatred toward another, what they are really accomplishing is to expose their own moral bankruptcy, sociopathic mental midgetry and reprobate nature, rather than their speech reflecting even the tiniest whit on the object of that hatred.
1John 2:11 But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.
1John 3:15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
A worthwhile project would be for a "disbeliever" to edit the Quran and substitute the word "Muslim" or "Muslims" in every instance in which the Quran references "disbelievers", "infidels" or other such terms for non-Muslims, as the folks at TheReligionOfPeace.com did with just a few verses, then let the global "hate speech" advocates judge Muhammad's speech:
For example Quran 8:55 - Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve....
Changed to: Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are Muslims who disbelieve....
The only thing that changed is which group is being spoken about, yet for some reason Muhammad and his apologists are unable to see, that Jesus is about love while Muhammad was about such hatred.
John 13:35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
Regulating speech puts Godless men like those that rule the countries listed above, in God's position of judging the condition of people's hearts, and then murdering them by statute based on those satanic judgments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=viOfDdkonu8
Sahih Bukhari B52 #177 Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "the Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
It is such a shame that so many choose to follow, that which is incapable of defending itself, in the light of truth. What the efforts by Islam's western dhimmis to regulate speech are really rooted in, is a desire in those who would lord over the rest of us through such legislation, to outlaw speech that does not agree with their own. Thus the father of lies will always remain the arbiter of speech regulation, just as in those countries listed previously, ultimately, necessarily, being enforced by the most murderous and reprobate that arise. Dhimmis in the U.S. government climbing on board, perhaps from tiring of suffering the continual embarrassment of putting themselves in the position of having to defend the indefensible, because of what they have chosen to believe. Today U.S. mainstream media and much of our government, have become self-censoring dhimmis of their Muslim Brotherhood masters, as revealed further on "The Global War Against Truth" page.
(URL) The Death of Reason
"We have now sunk to a depth at which re-statement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." ~ George Orwell
Since truth can handily defend itself, and falsehood readily exposes itself to those willing to seek out the truth, all that regulating speech regarding religion can be expected to accomplish is to advance falsehood at the expense of truth. Indeed since that is the natural intent of such infringement on the inalienable rights endowed on us by our by our Creator, we can rest assured that each and every law regulating "blasphemy", is inspired the father of lies himself.
Censorship as a substitute for truth since Muhammad's followers cannot reasonably deny that the entirety of the scripture-contrary, history devoid, archaeologically absent and geographically impossible Islamic so-called "tradition" - that masquerades as 4500 years of pre-Muhammad history but was pulled from thin air without reference to any actual historical record that preceded the 6th century AD - is other than a work of pure fiction that was all created and put to the pen in the 7th to 10th centuries AD. Since a case cannot be made that Muhammad even had a deity to blaspheme in the first place, will blasphemy laws also apply to Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, and flying donkey-mules, simply because someone chooses to believe in them?
Not surprisingly then, the only significant group actively campaigning to regulate what they judge to be "blasphemy" are the followers of Muhammad, who must censor the record of revelation of God's love, because Islam cannot stand in the light of the truth of the Gospel. Regulating speech without regulating Muhammad's own words which are blasphemy against the Gospel and the Son of God. This is why the Bible is restricted or banned in 53 primarily Islamic nations today. What kind of god would inspire an anti-religion, with a record of revelation that is so false and unsupportable that it would impose the death penalty for speaking honestly and openly about that record, even on matters revealed through its own record?
Quran Surah 5:33 The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
Excerpt from a less sanitized version at that link: ".....slain in great' numbers, or crucified in great numbers, or have, in l' result of their perverseness, their hands and feet cut off in great numbers....."
"Once again, women are the targets. In mid-March, [Muslim] rebels assaulted three women gathering firewood and cut off their ears, lips, and breasts."
Is it a surprise then, to find that it is an anti-religion that fills its followers with complete resolve to DISbelieve the whole subject of the Gospel? Indeed Muslims must believe the Gospel itself to be blasphemy based on what it indicates about Muhammad:
1John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
John 3:35-36 The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand. 36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
An example of blasphemy legislation in practice, was brought against a Christian mother of five who has been sentenced to death by a Pakistani court, for nothing more than an allegation of blasphemy that was brought against her by Muslim coworkers that demonstrated themselves to be anti-Christian bigots. In countries like Nigeria, statutes are of course unnecessary, because Christians are judged and murdered by Muslims through vigilantism.
The simple fact of the matter is that since one person's blasphemy is another person's praise, the only thing a human judge that engages in the folly of standing in judgment as God could be expected to accomplish, is Satan's will.
1Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Quran Surah 19:88 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" 89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Bukhari, V1 B2 #24 Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle.....
It would of course be pure blasphemy for a Christian to testify that Muhammad was a "messenger" of our God, since Muhammad proclaimed the exact opposite of the whole subject of the Gospel, but how often do we find Christians burning cars and rioting over Islam's blasphemy against the Son of God, or looting stores over Godless "artists", writers and cartoonists around the world that engage in blasphemy against Jesus Christ with impunity? The reason we don't get up in arms, is of course because we recognize that the one great God of the Jews and Christians YHWH is more than capable of defending Himself through the truth of His Holy Word, particularly considering that Jesus Christ Himself IS truth itself.
John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
This inability of Muhammad's "Allah" to defend himself, but instead requiring censorship of the truth by men through the power of the sword, is the same reason Muhammad's:
"Allah has hated for you three things: ... 3. And asking too many questions (in disputed religious matters)." Al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, #555
While in stark contrast the Scriptures command God's people to:
1Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
Christians recognize blasphemy as being a matter between the blasphemer and Jesus Christ, and so rather than feeling compelled to murder people or burn 1193 cars of innocent persons in response to a cartoon, we instead pray that Jesus will help the blasphemer overcome Satan and come to see the truth before it's too late. We pray for Muhammad's true followers who curse us, and are slaughtering Christians all around the world today, just as we are commanded to do.
Matthew 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Nowhere is the intent to obscure the truth and advance a lie by statute more obvious, than in Muhammad's follower's interest in instituting so-called "blasphemy" or "anti-blasphemy" laws, on a global scale. Pakistan has been the primary driving force at the U.N., to enact legislation that would prevent folks from speaking honestly and openly about Muhammad and Islam, for which the death penalty is currently imposed in many Islamic nations.
Earlier examples of regulating speech in the U.S., included a court-rejected effort by Donna Shalala to impose a "speech code" on the students at the University of Wisconsin, while today Islam's dhimmis strive toward back door destruction of the first amendment. Apparently as unable to comprehend as liberty destroying atheists, that if something offends someone, God gave us all the free will to change the channel, close the Internet page, or simply look away.
Much more on the web page.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/blasphemy_laws.htm
