Author Topic: Sharia Law in the U.S. and Elsewhere  (Read 4759 times)

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Sharia Law in the U.S. and Elsewhere
« on: January 24, 2010, 04:18:17 PM »
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/9273

Muslim Women Under Shari'a Law
by Nonie Darwish
Follow Israel opinion on Twitter and Facebook .

If you find it hard to believe that women received 40 lashes in Sudan recently for wearing (wide) trousers, read about the life of women under Shari'a (religious Muslim) law. Gaza is almost there, but the rest of the world is the goal. A warning.

Shari’a, that is Muslim law, controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the Western  World (including America ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shari’a Law under which wives can not obtain a divorce and men have full and complete control of their children.  It is amazing and alarming how many
Many of our sisters and daughters..in the Western world are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves... unsuspectingly to Shari'a law.
of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities and other parts of the Western world are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shari'a law.

By publicizing the information below, I hope to help enlightened American and other women avoid becoming slaves under Shari’a Law:
1. In the Muslim faith, a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old, consummating the marriage by 9.
2. A dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman who becomes a slave.
3. Even though a woman is abused she cannot obtain a divorce.
4. To prove rape, a woman must have four male witnesses.
5. Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry.  The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family.
6. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and do not have to say why the beating occurred.
7. A husband is permitted to have 4 wives and a temporary wife for a limited period at his discretion.
 
The goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shari’a law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.  If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual.  Islamic law (Shari’a) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.
 
Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.
 
While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh
Shari'a advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.
century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others..
 
While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with G-d, Shari'a advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.
 
It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.
 
While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in Egypt and elsewhere.
 
In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the  U.S. to elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA . Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are others....
  
It is too bad that so many accept Muslims as peaceful.. some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam... While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America .

More about the author:    
Nonie Darwish recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.  In it she warns about creeping shari’a law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.
 

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza  before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza.
 
When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.
 
But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing and later abandoned Islam.

resistingrexmundi

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Shariah law in the U.S.: Gov. Paterson offers to make Islam the state-sponsored religion of New York
Date:  8/13/2010 9:06:20 AM
 

by Bryan Fischer

When Gov. David Paterson of New York stepped into the breach to offer a resolution to the exploding controversy over building the Ground Zero mosque, he quite deliberately offered to grant Islam a favored status under New York public policy that is denied to Christian churches.

Here's what the governor said (emphasis mine): "If the sponsors were looking for property anywhere at a distance that would be such that it would accommodate a better feeling among the people who are frustrated, I would look into trying to provide them with the state property they would need."

He added some mumbo-jumbo about a competitive bidding process, but that was obviously just for show. If he wants to provide state land for a mosque, trust me, he will find a way, and his liberal friends will back him to the hilt.

Offering to provide government property for a house of worship normally would provoke howls of outrage from our hypersensitive friends on the left, who see grotesque breaches of the wall of separation between church and state even where the wall of their fevered imaginations doesn't exist.

Can you imagine the firestorm that would have erupted had the good governor offered to find state property for a Christian church? He'd have been dragged into court by the ACLU so fast it'd give him a nosebleed.

The First Amendment, remember, only prevents Congress from the "establishment" of religion, by which the Founders meant granting one Christian denomination preference in law and directing taxes to its support.

This means, of course, that states are free to "establish" a state religion if they wish, meaning they remain free to select one Christian denomination and give it official preference in law. At the time of the founding, nine of the 13 original states did in fact have an established church, that is, one Christian denomination that was the official church of that state.

Wisely, in my view, all states had abolished state establishment by 1833, but they remain constitutionally free to do so if they wish.

But our secular fundamentalist friends, with no regard for original intent, are quick to see First Amendment violations in things as benign as the Pledge of Allegiance and our national motto.

Thus it is noteworthy that the left has been strangely and totally silent on this offer by the governor of New York to give official state sponsorship and support to the religion of Islam.

The explanation? Most likely, secular fundamentalists are easy on Islam for the simple reason that they share with Islamic fundamentalists a deep and abiding hatred for America and its traditions and values.

But the Muslims behind the Ground Zero mosque turned down Gov. Paterson's offer instantaneously. They remain determined to build their monument to the great victory of Allah over the infidel on 9/11 no matter who it offends, no matter who it insults, and no matter who it provokes. Are these the actions of a religion of peace? I don't think so.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2010, 07:02:39 PM by Peter »
Doth that man love his Lord who would be willing to see Jesus wearing a crown of thorns, while for himself he craves a chaplet of laurel? Shall Jesus ascend to his throne by the cross, and do we expect to be carried there on the shoulders of applauding crowds? Charles H. Spurgeon

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Few have the understanding of our federal and state rights in regard to religion that Patterson detailed.

resistingrexmundi

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Few have the understanding of our federal and state rights in regard to religion that Patterson detailed.

I know. That is why I really wanted people to see this article. I think I might look up more stuff by Bryan Fischer and see what comes up.
Doth that man love his Lord who would be willing to see Jesus wearing a crown of thorns, while for himself he craves a chaplet of laurel? Shall Jesus ascend to his throne by the cross, and do we expect to be carried there on the shoulders of applauding crowds? Charles H. Spurgeon

yonah33

  • Guest
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/east-lansing-michigan-police-department-offers-10000-reward-in-quran-burning-case.html

"....$10,000 reward being offered in the investigation by the EWast Lansing Police Department of a Koran burning...
........
...the Qur'an nor any other book is protected from burning under American law. So why the huge reward from the East Lansing PD? And why is no one there prepared to answer any questions about their apparent attempt to enforce a Sharia provision rather than American law?......"

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/east-lansing-michigan-police-department-offers-10000-reward-in-quran-burning-case.html

"....$10,000 reward being offered in the investigation by the EWast Lansing Police Department of a Koran burning...
........
...the Qur'an nor any other book is protected from burning under American law. So why the huge reward from the East Lansing PD? And why is no one there prepared to answer any questions about their apparent attempt to enforce a Sharia provision rather than American law?......"

Since Lansing is just a stone's throw away from the U.S. "Mecca" of Dearborn Michigan, it wouldn't surprise me if there were Muslims in the Lansing police department that at least had enough sway to suggest something that is so preposterously unconstitutional.
But we already have dhimmitude in the form of Obamacare, and the 9-11 mosque will be built under the guise of free speech which will work just fine until some Christians stand on the sidewalk in front of the mosque and pass out tracts of the Gospel of John. That's when free speech will come to a close within blocks of the mosque - just like in Detroit.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Oklahoma's Ban on Shariah Law Blocked: Supporters Blame State Attorney General
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2010, 02:09:11 PM »
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/08/oklahomas-ban-shariah-law-blocked-critics-say-attorney-general-failed-respond/

A popular new law that bars Oklahoma courts from considering Islamic law, or Shariah, when deciding cases was put on hold Monday after a prominent Muslim in the state won a temporary restraining order in federal court.

Two state legislators were quick to blast the judge's ruling and the Oklahoma attorney general, who they said did not stand up to support the new law.

U.S. District Court Judge Vicki Miles-LeGrange ruled that the measure, which passed by a large margin in last Tuesday's elections, would be suspended until a hearing on Nov. 22, when she will listen to arguments on whether the court's temporary injunction should become permanent.

"Today's ruling is a reminder of the strength of our nation's legal system and the protections it grants to religious minorities," said Muneer Awad, executive director of Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) in Oklahoma, who filed the suit last Thursday, claiming the law violated his constitutional rights.

"We are humbled by this opportunity to show our fellow Oklahomans that Muslims are their neighbors and that we are committed to upholding the U.S. Constitution and promoting the benefits of a pluralistic society," Awad said.


Shariah is found in the Koran and is the basis of law in most Islamic countries, though its implementation varies widely. It has been used in Iran and Somalia, among other places, to condone harsh punishments like amputations and stoning.

Supporters of the Oklahoma ballot initiative, which passed with 70 percent of the vote, would not comment on the impact of the ruling. But state Sen. Anthony Sykes, who co-authored the measure, charged that the judge ruled as she did because the state’s attorney general, Drew Edmondson, failed to respond to the suit.

“The attorney general failed to file a response,” Sykes said. “I am afraid that this might get written in stone that shouldn’t be because the attorney general is leaving and a new one is coming in.”

Calls to Edmondson’s office were not returned.

Oklahoma state Rep. Rex Duncan, who co-sponsored the bill, said he hadn’t seen the judge's written ruling yet, but he was disappointed that “her words from the bench indicated she had completely embraced the plaintiff’s arguments.”

“They were pretty extraordinary statements from the judge,” he said.

Duncan and Sykes both said the state should have challenged whether Awad had the standing to bring the case.

“As far as we know, he flew into here from Georgia just to make the case," Duncan said. "We don’t think he is an Oklahoma resident or plans to stay. We don’t think he had standing.”

Duncan and others who pushed for the measure argued that the ban “will constitute a pre-emptive strike against Shariah law coming to Oklahoma." He said England has embraced 85 Shariah law courts and warned voters that "while Oklahoma is still able to defend itself against this sort of hideous invasion, we should do so."

Opponents argued that the measure was unnecessary because state judges have no reason to rely on Islamic law. Most of the state’s newspapers opposed the measure.

At an impromptu news conference following Monday's ruling, CAIR officials called on the sponsors of the ballot measure to repudiate hate messages they said have been received by Muslim institutions in Oklahoma following the law's passage.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Florida Judge Defends Imposing Sharia Law
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2011, 02:35:02 PM »
http://nation.foxnews.com/justice/2011/03/24/florida-judge-defends-imposing-sharia-law

"Florida Judge Defends Imposing Sharia Law

Judge orders use of Islamic Law in lawsuit arbitration: MyFoxORLANDO.com

A Florida judge is defending his controversial decision to apply Islamic law instead of state or federal statutes in determining whether an arbitration award was correct, the St. Petersburg Times reports.

The case in question involves former trustees of a local Tampa mosque, the Islamic Education Center of Tampa, who are suing because they claim they were unfairly removed as trustees.

Hillsborough Circuit Judge Richard Nielsen said that the two parties can seek guidance from the Koran to resolve their dispute, according to MyFoxOrlando.com.

Nielsen said that based on testimony, "under ecclesiastical law," and pursuant to the Koran, "Islamic brothers should attempt to resolve a dispute among themselves."

"If Islamic brothers are unable to do so, they can agree to present the dispute to the greater community of Islamic brothers within the mosque or the Muslim community for resolution," he said.

The two parties reportedly agreed ahead of time to use an imam and Islamic Law to resolve any potential differences through arbitration.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Florida judge rules case according to Islamic Sharia Law
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2011, 02:43:58 PM »
According to the theory put forth, I don't understand why a couple that married under Islamic law (which I imagine includes all marriages between Muslims), would not then allow the husband to divorce his wife by simply text messaging her "I divorce you" 3 times, the way they do in Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=778.0

It also adds the sticky wicket of a judge being put in a position of deciding what is right, according to Islamic law, rather than the laws of the U.S.
In other words both parties may claim their case is consistent with Islamic law which would require the judge to study Islamic law to make a determination, without even being a Muslim. This of course wouldn't be allowed to happen because Imams and Muftis would be said to be required to settle the dispute. So then the judge's ruling would be subservient to the ruling of an Islamic religious official.

This judge should be removed from the bench.

The whole thing would be laughable, were it not the insidiously conspicuous beginning of the implementation of Islamic Sharia in the U.S., just the way the English courts bent themselves to Islamic Sharia Law. The English courts, now accepting Islamic civil law to be dragged into their system, were forced to uphold a daughter only receiving half the inheritance that her brother did, which is how it is divided under Muhammadanism.

The agreement cited in the OP has no foundation in U.S. law, so it should not be heard in any court in the United States. Period. It needs to be made known loudly that any contracts made according to Islamic law, can only be settled between those parties within their Islamic community, and will not be heard in a U.S., or a State court. Oklahoma had it right by effectively doing so.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Sharia Law in the U.S. and Elsewhere
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2011, 11:03:34 AM »
At a quick glance it looks like a good site related to this thread topic.
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/

The Ohio school banned this Christian from speaking

Usama Dakdok
http://www.thestraightway.org/

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/group-sues-ohio-school-after-cair-forces-cancellation-of-anti-jihad-speech/

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Sharia Law in the U.S. and Elsewhere
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2011, 07:50:10 AM »
Wall Street profits from shariah financing
Financing our foes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EkLpRztq3k

ExMilitary

  • ecclesia
  • Sr. Member
  • Posts: 335
  • In the last days perilous times shall come
    • View Profile
New York City public school kids getting new Muslim, Lunar New Year holidays
« Reply #12 on: February 04, 2014, 02:12:03 PM »
New York City public school kids getting new Muslim, Lunar New Year holidays

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/nyc-public-school-kids-new-holidays-article-1.1601237

New York City is moving to close school for two Muslim holidays and the Lunar New Year — but Mayor de Blasio isn’t so sure about the Hindu festival Diwali.

Appearing on WNYC’s “Brian Lehrer Show” on Monday, the mayor said he hadn’t taken a position on whether Diwali, the festival of lights celebrated in India and other South Asian countries, should be a day off from school.

But he said he’d move forward with closing schools for Lunar New Year and for Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, Muslim holy days.

“It is complicated in terms of logistics and school calendar and budget. But it’s something I want to get done in a reasonable time frame,” he said.

A spokesman for the Indian community appealed to the mayor to recognize the Hindu holiday.

“We are disappointed. We’ve been trying for a long time … It’s very important for the community,” said Dr. Shashi Shah of the Association of Indians in America.

Ethnic communities have pushed for all four holidays to be recognized. Former Mayor Bloomberg opposed the change, saying kids should not miss more school.