Obama: The future must not belong to the God of the Jews and Christians

[PeteWaldo]

Or to quote Obama directly:

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPKf5IUGn_Y

To quote the inspired scriptures of the God of the Jews and Christians:

Matthew 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

From "Infidel" Ayaan Hirsi Ali explains part of salat, "You say Praise be to Allah thirty-three times; God forgive me thirty-three times; Allah is great thirty-three times; and then, if you choose, you may also say Gratitude to Allah."
http://www.beholdthebeast.com/islam_the_opposite.htm

[ps49]

Or to quote Obama more directly:

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam"

I wonder what he meant by slander? Does the simple act of denying Muhammed was a prophet of God count as slander? Most Muslims seem to think so. What if we go a step further and present rational arguments as to why Muhammed cannot be a genuine prophet? Is that slander or just exercising the right to freedom of thought and speech?

[PeteWaldo]

Or to quote Obama more directly:

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam"

I wonder what he meant by slander? Does the simple act of denying Muhammed was a prophet of God count as slander?

Without question calling Muhammad a false prophet is to slander him. The Medina Jew's denial of him as a prophet of our great God and refusal to reject the Torah, enraged Muhammad so much, that he beheaded innocent Jewish farm boys and their dads and grandpas and raped their little sisters and moms and pressed them into sexual slavery, while stealing their property of the labor of generations. In part because Muhammad and his boys didn't want to work for a living and perhaps because they couldn't get girls any other way. Just like the losers in the Islamic State today.
http://www.petewaldo.com/banu_qurayza_massacre.htm

Most Muslims seem to think so. What if we go a step further and present rational arguments as to why Muhammed cannot be a genuine prophet? Is that slander or just exercising the right to freedom of thought and speech?

The reason I selected the verse I did, is because it is inarguable that our great God slanders Muhammad regarding his praying precisely in the "vain repetitions of the heathen" that he engaged in and commanded his followers to engage in (that he picked up from the Sabians). As well as his followers being compelled by Satan to engage in this heathen prayer, which impacts the lives of hundreds of millions of Muslims, five times a day.

[PeteWaldo]

I wonder what he meant by slander?

I didn't realize what a good question that was until I was just about to embellish with God labeling Muhammad as an antichrist.....

1 John 2:22 ..... He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father.....

.....I realized that God calling Muhammad an antichrist that prayed in the vain repetitions of the heathen isn't slander, at least in the legal sense, since they are truthful matters of fact.

Perhaps that's why Obama used the term "slander" instead of the more typically used "insulting the prophet".

[ps49]

.....I realized that God calling Muhammad an antichrist that prayed in the vain repetitions of the heathen isn't slander, at least in the legal sense, since they are truthful matters of fact.

Yup - that's exactly what I was alluding to. It isn't slander, except in the mind of a Muslim...

Perhaps that's why Obama used the term "slander" instead of the more typically used "insulting the prophet".

Absolutely! To use the phrase "insulting the prophet" would be far too obvious. Instead, better to say "slander" to obfuscate his true allegiance behind an aura of legalistic and pompous 'righteousness.' Typical bulls**t politician really...

Who shall Americans likely elect to replace him?