speaking of parroting!!!
Yes parrotting, you can spew the doctrine you have learned fromArnold Murray false prophet/teacher as many times as you like it but that does not change the fact it is Scripturally bankrupt.
Here is a fact for you. YOU in fact deny the word of God. You can't take what fits you or makes your way of thinking work! I have already told you that Temple is physical or spiritual.
LOL there is a huge difference between denying the word of God and the doctrine you espouse. It doesn't matter what you say, what matters is what Scripture says! Not once after Christ declared the Jews temple desolate was it called the temple of God in Sccripture again. Rebuilding it won't change the fact it is already desolate. Do you believe a desolate building is the temple of God? Paul the person who wrote the verse about the man of sin repeatedly tells us the temple of God is the body of the believer or the corporate body. Can you show me one time Paul called a man made temple the temple of God? If not then why shouldn't I believe Scripture when it positively states the temple of God is the body of the believer or corporate body of believers?
The old temple has been destroyed and Christ raised a new one in 3 days!
I think you just run out of things to say didn't you?
Not at all I have no problem pointing out that repeating you error over and over agian will not make it true.
Daniel refers to the "boogieman" LOL as HE. POint Blank. May be you can read that different some how. I see it as Satan.
The He according to the interpretation you espouse is your future antichrist, unfortunately as I have pointed out many times parrotting this Scripturall bankrupt view multiple times does not make ot true. It only shows your willingness to stand by the false prophet you learned it from. But then again maybe you believed Arnold Murray when he said the battle of armageddon would begin in Alaska in 1985 too.
Also are you saying that Paul's writing is not inspired?? That is dangerous ground. Do you think he is a false prophet as well?? If NO. Then what he said must be correct then RIGHT?
Just because i disagree with the doctrine you espouse that comes from the known faleprophet/teacher Arnold Murray does not mean I question Paul. It only means I question the heresy he taught you that you now espouse.
HE said the "boogieman" will be destroyed with the brightness of Jesus Coming? Seems pretty simple to me.
No your boogie man is your supposed future antichrist from 1John2:18 you know the one John said this"this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. " about. Paul was talking about the man of sin not "the antichrist". If you are going to say thet are the same entity you need to prove it, not just parrot the words of a Scriptural bankrupt false prophet/ teacher who you choose to follow. Why would you follow the teachings of a false prophet who predicted Armageddon in Alaska in 1985?
Now if you would rather how about Mark 13
Oh so now you want to change the subject and discuss the abomination of desolation an it not a he?
14But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet (Dan 9:27), standing where it ( here along with Dan 9:27 should be HE and Dr. Moffit does translate this HE!)
Dr Moffit only says he in his interpretation because it fits the doctrine he espouses. Kind of like you even though you insisted you only use the KJV, except of course as your words show when it doesn't fit the doctrine you espouse!
ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains: 15And let him that is on the housetop not go down into the house, neither enter therein, to take any thing out of his house: 16And let him that is in the field not turn back again for to take up his garment.
These verses refer to how urgent the situation is.
It most definitely was an urgent warning as those who were in Judea that did not heed His warning certainly found out when they were either murdered, enslaved or made dhimmies.
What Jesus is saying is when you see this, The abomination from Dan, the end is that close. i.e. Jesus return.
Let's stick with what Scripture actually says. Those who were told to flee were told to flee because Jerusalem was about to be desolated. See Luke 21:24
17But woe to them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
this reference is lets you know for a fact that the abomination is a HE.
LOL this from the one who claims he only uses the KJV whhich identifies the abomination as an it that stands not a he that sitteth. Looks like you are having trouble using only the kJV as you said you do. It looks more like you use whatever version suits your fancy so long as it supports the doctrine your false prophet/teacher Arnold Murray espouses.
He is warning you not to play the harlot spiritually with "IT".
LOL no he is telling those who see it to flee the desolation that is about to be brought on Jerusalem. it is yoyr false prophet of a teacher that says not to play the harlot with it spiritually. How can one play a harlot with the dome of the rock?
18And pray ye that your flight be not in the winter. 19For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be. 20And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days. 21And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not: 22For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect. 23But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.
24But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, 25And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. 26And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
do you see that? after that tribulation the tribulation of "IT" then Jesus will return
LOL of course I see that Jesus does not return until after the tribulation, neither Peter or I have ever said, nor do either of us believe He will return before the tribulation. So why do you keep trying to convince He doesn't return until after the trib when we already believe He doesn't return until after the trib?
like Paul said. Jesus will consume HIM (the abomination, the one sitting in the temple claiming to be God) with the brightness of his coming.
Paul said it was the man of sin that would be consumed, he never said it was the abomination of desolation that would be consumed. You only believe that because you have bought into the heretical teachings of one false prophet/teacher named Arnold Murray. You know the guy who claimed in 1980 the antichrist would sit in the millenial temple iin Jreusalem in 1981. And as we can all see that didn't happen neither did the battle of Armageddon start in 1985 in Alaska llike he said it would. So why would anyone believe the rantings of a false prophet/teacher?
There is sound doctrine. You make this harder than it is. One more thing prophecy is NOT of private interpretation. The word of God is pretty plain about it.
And yet you continue to parrot the false and heretical teachings of a known fale prophet/ teacher which is nothing more then a twisted version of the futurist doctrine with Arnold Murray's own private interpretation added in to promote his racist views! Amazing isn't it?