John,
Let me be very clear. I do not feel that these discussions are productive or advancing correctly. I have discussed with many different people, Christians and others and although some of them disagreed with me, .........
My friend, how can a Christian do other than "disagree" with the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel?
How can a Christian do other than "disagree" with Muhammad's and your pure blasphemy against the Son of God?
The Christians that you chat with are in all likelihood as ignorant to the Quran, as your emails demonstrate you are to the Gospel.
......... while others converted to Islam, .......
A Christian cannot convert to Islam, because a Christian cannot be deceived by a false prophet.
Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that,
if [it were] possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Only someone who had deceived himself into believing he had been a Christian could be fooled into following Muhammad. Like someone who thinks they became a Christian when they were baptized at birth. that's why most of such were Roman Catholics that followed their priest rather than Jesus Christ.
....... there was a level of respect and polite manners.
I know how the conversation went. Each was ignorant to what the other believed because neither of you had read the others book. I'm saving you the trouble of having to beat around the bush.
Did you tell them that Muhammad compels you to DISbelieve the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel?
Did you tell them that Muhammad compels you to blaspheme and DENY the Son of God and to REJECT the blood He shed for us all for remission of sin?
Did you tell them that you must believe that each and every Christian over a period of nearly 2,000 years has lived and died in a state of committing Muhammad's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE sin and that they would be better off going out and raping children or mass murdering school rooms full of children, than to confess that Jesus is the Son of God or even pray in Jesus name?
Did you tell them Muhammad compels you to REJECT the hundreds of verses that proclaim that Jesus is the Son of God and God His Father?
Your general nature appears very belligerent and full of hate, ......
I am called to love the things that God loves, and hate the thing that God hates, like nicolaitanism, and doctrines of demons from false prophets like Muhammad - who proclaimed the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel. I am called to preach Christ crucified, and if your Christian acquaintances aren't, they are doing you an disservice.
1Cr 1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;
It might not even be so bad that Muhammad is leading his people straight to the pit of hell, if he hadn't commanded them to conquer and subjugate everyone else in the world, to denying the Son of God and rejecting the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jihad_islamic_terrorism.htmThat isn't having some ancillary "disagreement' around the edges my friend. According to the scriptures you are following THE false prophet Muhammad straight into the pit of hell.
........ which is not conducive for a healthy discussion on truth and knowledge.
Avoiding the truth is what is not "healthy" for such a discussion. The God of the scriptures YHWH, and the Arabian pagan deity "Allah" are mutually exclusive, as they profess the opposite. Even Muhammad knew it was a demon that met him in that cave. His wife Khadijah talked him out of it. So the real reason you follow Muhammad, is Khadijah.
Despite my disagreements with you and the fact that I feel your points are weak .....
You see how your have lost your capacity for critical thought?
To suggest that it is a "weak point" to point out to you that
the false prophet Muhammad compels you to believe the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel?A weak point to point out to you
that you blaspheme the Son of God?You think it is a "weak point" that
mecca never existed prior to the 4th century AD, or the pagan's kaaba prior to the late 5th century, even though that alone,
throws the entirety of Muhammadan 7th-10th century created fictional poppycock, that you are stuck calling "tradition", right out the window.A "weak point" that Islam is a violent, imperialistic, murderous, anti-religion, with a history-devoid, scripture-contrary, archaeology-bankrupt, reality-ignoring, geographically-impossible Islamic so-called "tradition", that masquerades as thousands of years of pre-Muhammad history, yet was all created and put to the pen in the 7th to 10th centuries AD without reference to any actual historical record that preceded the 6th century AD.
A weak point that you follow Muhammad alone, through thinly veneered Arabian pagan rituals, and his STAND-ALONE 23 year 7th century record that proclaims the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel, that IS NOT a path to the one true God of the Jews and Christians as He revealed Himself through ALL of the prophets and witnesses in His 1600 year record of revelation to mankind, that His people have followed through two covenants for 3500 years. A record that is well supported by history, archaeology and fulfilled prophecy, that is consistent with the physical geography, and can even be confirmed mathematically.
Rather, by all indications, Islam is a path to the EXACT OPPOSITE.
....... and do not challenge me like other discussions I have had with Christians and socialists,........
That's funny "Christians and socialists". Like Muhammad's buffoonery of lumping together "Christians and Sabians"! Those are all different things my friend.
What you mean is
you failed to meet the challenge of presenting some historical and archaeological EVIDENCE that can suggest that Mecca ever existed before the pagan's settled the area in the 4th century, and built their kaaba in the late 5th century for pagan Arabian moon, sun, star and jinn-devil worship.
You failed to explain how it makes sense to reject ALL of the prophets and witnesses of as revealed in the 1600 year record of YHWH to mankind, whose people have followed him through two covenants for 3500 years, to follow a STAND-ALONE illiterate 7th century false prophet who proclaimed the exact opposite, while compelling you to engage in thinly veneered pagan Arabian Star Family and jinn-devil worship rituals, and prostrate yourself to the Quraish pagan's black stone and Kaaba five times a day.
....... who made points where I had to do proper research to respond to them, .......
So where is the history of Mecca that you researched? Do you understand that the reason you can't consider that a point worth researching, is because you already know for a fact that there is no history of Mecca prior to the 4th century AD, except in the minds of the men who created the fiction that you call "tradition" in the 7th to 10th centuries AD, without reference to any actual historical record that preceded the 6th century AD.
....... I feel that Almighty God will not be pleased with my tit for tat insults and therefore, I wish to end this here.
The thing about our chat that really displeases the ONE true God of the scriptures
isn't about attitude but THE FACT that you BLASPHEME the Son of God and DENY the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel.1John 4:14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son [to be] the Saviour of the world. 15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.
2John 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
1John 5:12 He that hath the Son hath life; [and]
he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. 1John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself:
he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.Hebrews 10:29
Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy,
who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified,
an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
1John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ?
He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and
the Son. 23
Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [(but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also].
2Peter 2:1 But there were
false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies,
even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and
he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.I prefer to speak to Christians who display 'Christian manners,' which I have experienced when speaking to chaplains and common folk, here in England.
No doubt because they remain as blissfully unaware of the Quran and pagan traditions of Islam, as you do to the Gospel.
Have you ever even read the New Testament?
Here we may disagree, but we do not insult each others's belief.
How can pointing out that the false prophet Muhammad proclaimed the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel be taken as other than an insult? How can pointing out Muhammad's blasphemy against the Son of God be taken as other than an insult?
What you don't understand is that the prophesied apostasy of the church has been in full swing in Europe for generations. All this sitting around a campfire and singing koom bye yah is not fruitful. "All roads lead to heaven" "Gee can't we all just get along?".
What they don't realize is that you are commanded by Muhammad to conquer and subjugate them, to denying the Son of God and rejecting His shed blood - the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel. You are commanded to subjugate them to parroting this pure filthy blasphemy against the ONE true God of the scriptures:
Bukhari, V1 B2 #24 Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle.....
Perhaps where you reside, you hate each other and want to kill one another.
Wherever Islam lives, they want to kill each other. Pull your head out of the sand and take a look around:
"
Sunni Muslim terrorists committed “about 70 percent†of the 12,533 terrorist murders in the world last year, according to a report by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC)."
That's for the year 2011, and
that percentage doesn't even include Shiite Muslim terrorist murders. Thus it should be obvious to all non-Muslims, that the world would be largely at peace today, if the followers of Muhammad had not been commanded to "fight and slay" non-Muslims in the "cause" of "Allah".
I think these sort of 'Christians' and Al Qaeda are made for each other.
There is only ONE "sort of Christian":
Mat 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Just as there is only ONE "sort of Muslim"
Quran Surah 9.111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise):
they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:
a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and
the Qur'an:.....
That is of course another of Muhammad's filthy lies regarding the Gospel binding anyone to fight and slay,
but a promise binding on you in the QuranI believe in truth, regardless of weak arguments against it. One advice, insulting someone does not win the argument. I could actually answer every single one of your points with strong counter evidences, .......
Don't be silly. That would make you the first Muslim in world history to present substantive historical or archaeological EVIDENCE that suggests that Mecca ever existed before Arabian pagans settled the area in around the 4th century AD.
And I said substantive, not more foolishness like the Bible you abused later in your email.
......... but with your attitude, I feel my own level has stooped to a level which is not consistent to what we do: call others to God.
What you in fact do is call others to follow Satan by prostrating yourselves to the Quraish pagan's black stone and Kaaba five times a day.
Let me assure you, I am not doing taqiyyah, or let God account me.
I understand that all of your foolishness could be from ignorance, and listening to Greek sophist styled deceiving antichrists like Ahmed Deedat. But now you have been shown the whole subject of the Gospel, and when you stand before the very Son of God that you blaspheme in judgment, you won't be able to plead ignorance:
John 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
Your days of wishing you could escape the wrath of God are over now that you have been shown the truth through scripture. Nothing quite describes your willingness to continue to ignore the truth at your peril, and as though it was never presented to you, as these verses:
2Pe 2:21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known [it], to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.
22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
I actually believe in the true, one God of the universe, Lord of all, yet you choose to be arrogant.
I'm sorry my friend, but it has been shown repeatedly to you that you in fact believe in the EXACT OPPOSITE by rejecting ALL of the prophets and witnesses as revealed in the 1600 year record of YHWH to mankind, to follow the EXACT OPPOSITE of that record through Muhammad alone.
So, I will politely give my final views and if you wish to accept, fine. If not, I would appreciate if you would not insult as that just degrades your missionary work and soils the whole notion of 'born again.'
How can pointing out that you believe the EXACT OPPOSITE be construed as other than an insult? I am presenting the unvarnished truth, because I am desperate for you my friend. Unlike those pseudo-christians that are afraid to show you the truth. That Islam is as opposite to the Gospel, as Muhammad was to Jesus Christ.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jesus_or_muhammad.htmLike I said, even if I reject your responses, I will leave it here as you obviously do not wish to accept Islam and so I will not waste time and counter respond and insult, which is not right.
Muhammad's followers always fall back on this "insulting" defense to avoid the truth.
How could a follower of Muhammad alone, expect it to seem other than insulting, when you to learn that the Quran is as opposite to the scriptures, as Muhammad was to Jesus Christ?
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jesus_or_muhammad.htmPlease understand, that what in fact you actually find insulting,
IS TRUTH. I've just been honest enough to present it to you in an unvarnished and time efficient manner, to save our mutual time. I'll sent a separate email for each of your numbered "points".
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/index.htmIf you wish to address these replies please join us in the forum where I have already copy and pasted our conversation. That way, rather than repeating myself ad nauseum as you seem to require, I can simply offer you a link.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=3755.0