Hello aurangzaib, and welcome to the forum!
For I.Q.Al-Rassooli,
Hi, dear one. I wish to appreciate your enthusiasm and your inner spirit to expose the realities of Islam that you have discovered.
I hope those discoveries of yours are of an academic nature and fully veritable. However, the style of your challenge and offer of a monetary reward do not reflect an academic mindset. I sense a street-wise sorcerer/debater/acrobat hidden behind the garb of an academician.
So typical of Muslims to attack the messenger, through empty false accusation and innuendo, because they are unable to refute the substance of the message.
I also sense, unfortunately, that you do not possess US$100,000/- , and if you do that, you would not venture to pay that much money in case of your impending defeat.
If all of his claims are true he wouldn't have to pay out the money. I would be interested to learn which of his claims you believe to be false, including according to Islam's own books, that you speculate would result in his "impending defeat".
That's a big amount of money which can easily make anyone retreat from his stand.
Sorry to have to claim a prescience about your challenge and its end result.
But, I mean well for you. I appreciate Dr. Rafat Amari's research and feel quite sure that it has solid grounds about the origins of Makkah, Ka'bah and the Quraish tribe.
If I am understanding correctly, it is good to see you reject (perhaps have even overcome) at least the claims of any pre-4th century Islamic so-called "tradition", that was all created and put to the pen in the 7th-10th centuries AD, without reference to any actual historical record from before the 5th century AD.
http://www.historyofmecca.com/geography_mecca_islam.htmIt could even be that Dr. Amari did not go far enough as the historian in the video at this link suggests that Muhammad himself may have been a part of Islamic fiction:
http://www.historyofmecca.com/#documentary_filmI may have some differences about his posture on the claimed negativity of its message.
As we see Muhammad's orthodox fundamental followers slaughtering, raping and subjugating non-Muslims around the world, it isn't difficult for we non-Muslims to get a bit worked up.
I believe he follows the fictitious Islam and its fictitious teachings that true Islamic was replaced with at the advent of Despotic Rule of Mu'aviyah as early as 35 A.H.
Wish you good luck. I request for a detailed introduction of your self and your works.
While I can't answer to your address to I.Q.Al-Rassooli, I believe he makes himself quite available for you to accept his challenge directly with him. Though we have likely covered all of his points in this forum if you take issue with any of his claims.
Regarding what you refer to as "fictitious Islam and its fictitious teachings" I don't doubt that is in part a reference to Muhammad's ride on a flying donkey-mule to Jerusalem, up to the "paradise" of his overactive imagination, and return to Mecca by morning. This fantasy, of course, constitutes the only
religious claim that Muhammad's followers have to any part of the Holy Land.
From a Christian perspective, we only need to see
Muhammad's denial of the basis of the whole subject of the Gospel, to understand that Islam transcends "fiction" and becomes pure blasphemy against the Gospel of Jesus Christ:
Surah 4:157
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/Is that part of what you characterize as "fictitious Islam"?
I would be happy to answer any questions you may have in regard to the content on the site at that link.
Again, welcome to the forum.
