you follow Paul whom he was impersonating but in reality he was not Apostle
Beginning with a false premise, will only result in false presumptions and conclusions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuAdmZIoR8chttp://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1310.0It is a sad but an
undeniable fact that
you follow Muhammad alone in the
exact opposite of the Gospel and thus
must DISbelieve the crucifixion of Christ - the basis of
the whole subject of the Gospel - and thus must
REJECT the blood of the Lamb of God that would save you from your sins, while you
DENY and blaspheme the Son of God, as articles of your faith in THE false prophet
Muhammad alone. Time is rapidly running out on you my friend.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/shirk_unforgivable_sin.htmHowever if you had ever read the Gospel you would easily understand that
we follow ALL of the prophets and witnesses, as revealed
in the 1600 year record of Yahweh to mankind, whose people have followed Him through two covenants for 3500 years.
While you follow the stand-alone, heavily abrogated, 23-year 7th century record of a single stand-alone self-proclaimed "messenger", that is the exact opposite.http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=116.0Just as Muhammad was the opposite of Jesus:http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jesus_or_muhammad.htm#muhammads_crueltyWith the Quran being inspired by Waraqa bin Naufal, Jabr, Tubba and old Arabic, Egyptian and Hebrew fables, or "tales of the ancients" as the Quran refers to Muhammad's fables.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=452.0Along with the self-serving parts that Muhammad included because of his greed.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=3775.0http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htmLuke 24:44 And he said unto them,
These [are] the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and [in] the prophets, and
[in] the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, 46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and
thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And ye are witnesses of these things.
So what Old Testament prophecy, was "written in the Psalms", that Jesus was making reference to?
Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me:
they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I may tell all my bones: they look [and] stare upon me. 18
They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.http://www.islamandthetruth.com/psalms_22.htmConfirmed as fulfilled by the New Testament witnesses.
Matthew 27:35 And
they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.
Mark 15:24 And when
they had crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.
Luke 23:33 And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there
they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left. 34 Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.
John 19:23 Then the soldiers,
when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also [his] coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. 24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.
We follow all of the Gospel witnesses as revealed in scripture. Why don't you try reading the Gospel and actually thinking for yourself, rather than depending on the transparent buffoonery of Greek sophist styled entertaining, lying deceiving antichrists, like Ahmed Deedat?
Why not preface your study by investigating the First Epistle of John and decide if Ahmed Deedat was telling the truth, or told filthy lies, when he replied to a question as to whether Muhammad was antichrist:
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/first_epistle_john.htm