"Iran’s state-controlled media are talking up the possibility of extorting “many billions of dollars†in further ransom payments from the United States, and they have been stocking up on American hostages to get the money."more
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/10/20/iran-takes-more-u-s-hostages-wants-more-ransom/Back in the 1980s when
Jimmy Carter allowed the Iranians to to hold 60 American hostages for 444 days, that the Islamic antichrists had captured from the U.S. Embassy, the captors dropped the hostages like a hot potato and let them go upon Ronald Reagan's
first day in office just hours after Reagan gave his inaugural address. That was no coincidence. They were stupid, but not stupid enough to not realize what would be visited upon them, by a conservative U.S. President.
Few things highlight the wrongheadedness of what Obama surprisingly and amusingly desires to be his "legacy" of guaranteeing that Iran becomes a nuclear power, than the most recent demand by Iran for billions of dollars, in exchange for yet more hostages that remain in Iran. Would any sane and rational person expect a different outcome, once a kidnapping nation State, has been paid off with ransom money?
Certainly
few things are more Islamic than capturing and ransoming hostages since Muhammad enriched himself the same way, while recommending taking captives only after a great slaughter had been visited upon the formerly free people he was attacking:
Surah 8.67
(Pickthall) It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he hath made slaughter in the land.....Narrated Anas: Some men of the Ansar asked for the permission of Allah's Apostle and said, "Allow us to give up the ransom from our nephew Al-'Abbas. The Prophet said (to them), "Do not leave (even) a Dirham (of his ransom)." (Book #46, Hadith #714)
Abu Juhaifa said, "I asked, 'What is (written) in this sheet of paper?' Ali replied, it deals with The Diyya (compensation (blood money) paid by the killer to the relatives of the victim), the ransom for the releasing of the captives from the hands of the enemies, and the law that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for the killing of (a disbeliever). (Book #3, Hadith #111)
The subject of ransom in discussed in 27 different Hadiths in Bukhari:
http://www.searchtruth.com/searchHadith.php?keyword=ransom&translator=1&search=1&book=&start=0&records_display=10&search_word=allAnd in 24 Hadiths in Sahih Muslim:
http://www.searchtruth.com/searchHadith.php?keyword=ransom&translator=2&search=1&book=&start=0&records_display=10&search_word=allThis of course further reinforces the fact that Obama's actual legacy, will be to have been the worst and most damaging president in the history of the Republic, the main reasons for which some of us have been acutely aware:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=3931.0http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4607.0Particularly since Obama larded our NSA with Muslims:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=3664.0While Hillary has had as her closest confident the daughter of Muslim Brotherhood (recognized by other countries, but of course not Obama, as an international terrorist organization) operatives for parents.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=5141.0One ray of hope is that the last time Iran got in the business of taking U.S. hostages when Jimmy Carter was President, the day Ronald Reagan took office the Iranians let the hostages go because they weren't stupid enough to hold hostages, with a conservative President in power. Just like Obama, Jimmy Carter let the kidnappers dictate the terms of what he was to do, while he (typical of the Left) "negotiated". The Iranians knew the jig was up when Reagan got elected.
But now Obama is in an even worse position than Carter, because he has his ego, his entire presidency and his sense of self-worth, are tied up in the shocking "deal" he made with the Iranians. So he's stuck with egg all over his face as his true "legacy" becomes ever more apparent.