Mohammed's followers in this forum often turn to blasphemy against the Word of God, once they come to understand that Mohammed's 7th century religion, teaches the direct opposite of the Gospel.
Charges such as modern Bible version corruption and similar claims abound, even though
in the 7th century after the Gospel had been copied perhaps tens of thousands of times and was being read in every popular language all over the known world, Mohammed quipped that people of the Gospel should judge by what is revealed therein.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1704.0Muslims have no choice but to believe that the Gospel had somehow become
so "corrupted", and that the lengthy accounts of the witnesses of Jesus Christ - and it's whole primary subject - are somehow supposed to have become so "corrupted" that they became
the very opposite of what they had been. This, purely because the Gospel is the opposite of the unhistorical and unsupported claims made by Mohammed in the 7th century.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.0Yet the record of Islam is appallingly confused
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=116.0and inspired by
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=452.0with a textual history of
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=96.0Here's a thread regarding the history and textual integrity of Scripture
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=97.01Cr 1:18
For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. Christ crucifiedThe problem with this line of argument is, of course, that
no versions of the Gospel, in any language, from any period throughout the Christian era, have ever contradicted Jesus' sacrifice on the cross to save mankind from sin. That's what the Gospel - the Messiah and the new covenant He ushered in - have been, and will always be about.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1175.0And the whole reason they reject the Gospel, as recounted by the witnesses of Jesus Christ, is because they follow the words of
a single, 7th century, illiterate southeast Arabian desert dweller.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=148.0Mohammed's 23 year record is to the Gospel, as the negative is to a photograph. Mohammed's followers filled with complete resolve as to what to
DISbelieve, without a clue offered to them as to
who did die on the cross.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=628.0Gal 1:9
As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.At the same time, Muslims are
unable to produce any evidence whatsoever, from before Mohammed and the 7th and 8th century Islamic "tradition" creators, that suggests that Mohammed's religion ever existed before Mohammed.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.0So then we would appreciate it, if rather than carrying on with these tired, empty, hollow, and unsubstantiated claims regarding the Gospel, you instead
produce for us a single version of the New Testament, from any point in history, in any language whatsoever, that tells a different story other than Jesus was crucified, died and was resurrected, to save all mankind who have faith in His shed blood, from sin.
2Cr 11:3
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or [if] ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with [him].Heaping on more blasphemy against the Word of God, will never magically create thousands of years of history of Mecca prior to the 4th century, so we can understand the lashing out in frustration.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.01John 5:10
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.In summary, a frustration that is born out of Mohammed's followers standing empty handed, whether in regard to the absence of a pre-Mohammed record that suggests that Mohammed's religion ever existed before Mohammed, or the equally empty and absurd contention, that the whole main subject of the Gospel was once somehow, something other than it has been for the last nearly 2,000 years.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=97.0
