THE BIG LIENowhere in Article 1 is there any provision for a "separation of Church and State". The "establishment clause", Article 1 was intended to prevent the Federal government from establishing a single "State Church" such as the Church of England, while at the same time
guaranteeing the free exercise of religion. While it prohibits the Federal government from establishing a State Church, individual states were free to establish their own state churches and several did, until it became apparent to those that did, that taxing citizens to support a religious institution they did not belong to, was wrong and unChristian.
Will prayer before every session of Congress and even at our local Commission meetings be ended? The interdenominational prayer that opened the first congress was over 3 hours long. Twenty-six of the members of our original congress were graduates of seminary schools. Our forefathers knew, and stated repeatedly, that the form of government they were establishing could never survive without firm roots in God's laws, and His ultimate judgment. The only books required in our early schools were the Bible and a hymnal.
".....He that ruleth over men [must be] just, ruling in the fear of God." 2 Samuel 23:3.
Will the few, that are hostile to the vast majority's free exercise of religion, continue to prevail in our God-hostile liberal courts? When I say few I mean very few. According to the CIA World Factbook only 4% of the U.S. has no belief in God.
Protestant 51.3%, Roman Catholic 23.9%, Mormon 1.7%, other Christian 1.6%, Jewish 1.7%, Buddhist 0.7%, Muslim 0.6%, other or unspecified 2.5%, unaffiliated 12.1%,
none 4% (2007 est.)
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=487.0"The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments in a courthouse is that you cannot post "Thou Shalt Not Steal," "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery" and "Thou Shall Not Lie" in a building full of lawyers, judges and politicians - it creates a hostile work environment." - anonymous email
So firmly rooted in God was the foundation of our once-great Republic, that suggestion of any "separation of church and state" had only been brought before the Supreme Court on 2 occasions in the prior 150 years before Everson, in 1947.
THOMAS JEFFERSON DANBURY LETTER
"There is probably no other instance in America's history where words spoken by a single individual in a private letter-words clearly divorced from their context-have become the sole authorization for a national policy." - David Barton (Reference to Jefferson's Danbury letter and the so-called "separation of church and state")
Where the historical revisionists, aristocratic activist liberal judges and media pundits began to be so misguided regarding the ridiculous notion of any "separation of church and State" is from the Everson case in 1947 which used a metaphor contained in the Danbury letter written by Thomas Jefferson.
Ironically, "The Congressional Records from June 7 to September 25, 1789, record the months of discussions and debates of the ninety Founding Fathers who framed the First Amendment. Significantly, not only was Thomas Jefferson not one of those ninety who framed the First Amendment, but also, during those debates not one of those ninety Framers ever mentioned the phrase "separation of church and state." It seems logical that if this had been the intent for the First Amendment-as is so frequently asserted-then at least one of those ninety who framed the Amendment would have mentioned that phrase; none did." (Original Intent p. 48)
However, "So clearly did Jefferson understand the Source of America's inalienable rights that he even doubted whether America could survive if we ever lost that knowledge. He queried: And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have lost the only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson ('Original Intent' p. 46)
To learn more about the founding of our nation, not from liberal liars, but in the words of the founders themselves, from original source material, order a copy of David Barton's "Original Intent" from Wall Builders.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/While spewing anti-semetic venom Hitler did make some good points regarding the development to eventual believability of "the big lie".
Hitler On The Big Lie
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds
they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/hitlerlie.html