Barak Obama on the Crusades - Anybody Surprised?

[PeteWaldo]

It would have otherwise been unimaginable for anybody besides Barak Obama (of whom by now it should be expected), to choose the occasion of a National Prayer Breakfast, to use the opportunity to take a shot at Christianity, in his transparent effort to excuse 1400 years and present day imperialistic conquest of Islamic Jihad.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jihad_islamic_terrorism.htm#islamic_first_jihad

The truth matters not to Obama's effort to propagandize, rather than admit that Muslims are specifically called and commanded to imperialistic conquest:

Surah 9.111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods.....they fight in His cause, and slay.....a promise binding on Him in.....the Qur'an:
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jihad_islamic_terrorism.htm

It mattered not to Obama that the Crusades happened nearly a thousand years ago, nor does it matter to Obama that the purpose of the Crusades was to liberate and regain the Holy Land that had been conquered by the Muhammadans in the mid 7th century, and to free our brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus that lived there and suffered under the oppression and dhimmitude of an Islamic slave state and also to renew God's people's ability to travel to our Holy Land on pilgrimage.

The religion of Islam has nothing whatsoever to do with any part of the Holy Land, besides Muhammad's ridiculously tall tale of having ridden there from Mecca on a flying donkey-mule one night, with a leg up to the "paradise" of Muhammad's overactive imagination and back to Mecca by morning.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1253.0

The Holy Land was just another conquered land of the imperialistic conquest of nearly the whole known world of the Islamic First Jihad, all the way up into France and Austria.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jihad_islamic_terrorism.htm#islamic_first_jihad

Mecca (and to a lesser extent Medina) are the "holy land" of Islam, and its worship centers around the Quraish pagan's black stone idol and Kaaba, that was built in the 5th century AD for pagan Arabian moon, sun, star and jinn-devil worship.
http://www.historyofmecca.com/geography_mecca_islam.htm#hebron

One of the statements Obama made that was most telling, was his declaration that: "Many atrocities were committed in the name of Christ....."

Yet when he was referencing the Islamic Jihad that is going on today, he referred to it as atrocities committed "in the name of religion". Well Mr. President, "religion" isn't a name. Why couldn't this president, whose formative years were spent in Indonesia, bring himself to say "atrocities committed in the name of Muhammad or "Allah" when he had no trouble whatsoever with saying atrocities committed in the name of christ?

Could it be for the same reason he proclaimed: “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer” – Barack Hussein Obama
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQz2naHi910

"Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”"
http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/02/obama-call-to-muslim-prayer-is-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth-at-sunset/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsnZi-Kn4pU

And of course the Islamic call to prayer is pure blasphemy from a Christian perspective and proselytism to Islam. Here are a few highlights of the satanic blasphemy in the "Adhan":

"Allah is the greatest, Allah is the greatest.
I bear witness that there is no God but Allah.
I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah."

Of course when the Arabian pagan's proclaimed the first line before Muhammad ever invented Islam, they were holding up their moon god Allah as being the greatEST of all of their Arabian pagan deities.
But even if one sets aside the Quraish pagan's moon god's blasphemous name of "Allah" - that is a name of blasphemy when used for the name of the ONE true God of the scriptures YHWH - since if Muhammad was a "messenger" of the God of the scriptures, then all of the prophets and witnesses as revealed in those scriptures were false and Jesus Christ perhaps the most false among them, for having prophesied His own crucifixion, death and resurrection.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm

The only way a Christian could even abide that verse, much less find it one of the most beautiful or sweetest things that one can hear, is through the actual truth revealed in it. That truth being that Muhammad was indeed a "messenger" of the same pagan moon god "deity" named "Allah", that the Arabian pagans worshiped when they invoked the very same name, before Muhammad was ever born.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/the_name_allah.htm#etymology_name_allah

Whom we Christians of course know as the father of all false religion and strife in the world, who is also the father of lies, Satan.
http://www.petewaldo.com/hajj_umrah.htm#al_safa_al_marwah

Obama even told us the "why" himself, many years ago, through his accidental admission:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M

But a nation - the weaker minds in which succumbed to Obama's skillful use of NLP (neuro linguistic programming), perhaps may not have had the ears to hear it until more recently as we watch the spectacle of the orthodox Muslims of the Islamic State who fully understand that fighting and slaying in the cause of "Allah" is "binding" on them "in the Quran".
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/the_islamic_state.htm

Now that the rest of the world is gaining a fuller understanding of what the term Jihad means, thanks to the murder, mayhem and misery perpetrated by the orthodox Muslims of The Islamic State.

Obama gave us all the warning we needed when he came out of the closet with this whopper:

"Future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam"
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=3931.0

Once again defining his "Christianity" by promoting and advancing the EXACT OPPOSITE from a STAND-ALONE false prophet.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/

And advancing the lie about Islam being a religion of peace.

[Bistabuster]

Surprised?  Hardly. 

We know for a fact (now), that there will be no problem of Obama criticizing Christianity or any other religion EXCEPT Islam!!

I knew that YEARS AGO!!!!!!!  I was just waiting to see if he had the balls to insult us! 

He did with no problems at all!

[PeteWaldo]

Driving the car yesterday I heard a great editorial on Glenn Beck by David Barton (Wall Builders) that offered some statistics on the numbers of dead from crusades and inquisitions compared to Christians killed by Islam as well as secular governments. Haven't found it yet.

[PeteWaldo]

 The Barbary Powers Wars

David Barton - 08/01/2013
What important American victory in the Barbary Powers Wars
occurred on this date in 1801?
(*See below for the answer.)

The Barbary Powers Wars were the first wars officially declared against America following our victory in the War for Independence. [1] Muslim terrorists from five different Islamic nations (Turkey, Tunis, Morocco, Algiers, and Tripoli) were making indiscriminate attacks against the property and interests of what they claimed to be “Christian” nations (America, England, France, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden, etc.). [2] These Muslim terrorists (called Barbary, that is, barbaric “pirates” by most Americans) attacked American civilian and commercial merchant ships wherever they found them, seizing the cargo and enslaving the crew. [3]

In 1784, Congress dispatched three diplomats – John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson – to negotiate with these Muslim nations and end the unprovoked attacks. [4] They found this to be a difficult task, for the attacking of ships and the taking of Christians by Muslims had been a widespread problem for centuries. [5]
 
The Muslims found they could finance their wars and terror operations by enslaving and then selling captured seamen. (The Muslims took 1.25 million captive slaves in that period. [6]) Because this was such a widespread and recurring problem, other Christian nations formed standing organizations to raise money to purchase enslaved seamen. As Jefferson explained:

"    There is here an order of priests called the Mathurins, the object of whose institutions is the begging of alms for the redemption of captives. About eighteen months ago, they redeemed three hundred, which cost them about fifteen hundred livres [$1,500] apiece. They have agents residing in the Barbary States, who are constantly employed in searching and contracting for the captives of their nation, and they redeem at a lower price than any other people can. [7]"

Ransoming Americans was no less expensive, and therefore was a very profitable trade for the Muslim terrorists. [8] Additionally, the Muslim nations would sign treaties with the attacked nations, including America, providing that for an annual "tribute" (perhaps $1 million a year, along with the "gift" of several frigates), that they would perhaps refrain from further attacks. By 1795, such "peace" payments to Muslim terrorists comprised a full sixteen percent of the entire federal budget!  [9]
 
Among the many treaties signed with Muslim nations during this period was the famous 1797 treaty with Tripoli. It was one of the many treaties in which each country officially recognized the religion of the other in an attempt to prevent further escalation into a “Holy War” [10] such as had existed between Christians and Muslims in the Middle Ages.

The Muslims considered that all Christian nations were like those of the Crusades, when Christians fought Muslims simply because they were Muslims. [11]  However, America was definitely not like the European Christian nations from medieval times, for we did not kill Muslims, Jews, or any one else for their faith. In fact, many Founding Fathers talked about how different America as a Christian nation was from the European Christian nations; [12] and the American treaties, including the Treaty of Tripoli, made this very point. 
 
Significantly, secularists regularly cite one clause from that treaty in devious attempts to make it appear that the Founding Fathers emphatically avowed that America was not a Christian nation. They thus quote from that treaty the line declaring "The government of the United States is in no sense founded on the Christian religion . . . " This declaration certainly seems to be straightforward – until you discover that the critics only used part of the quote. Notice what the full, unedited clause states:

    As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims]. and as the said States [America] have never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries. [13] (emphasis added)

This clause from the Treaty of Tripoli simply affirms that America was not one of the European Christian nations with an inherent hostility toward Muslims, and that America had never been part of arbitrary wars against Muslims such as had characterized the Crusades. This clause definitely does not deny or undermine America's strong Christian heritage – unless you wrongly place a period in the middle of the sentence, as secularist critics do.

continued:
http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=146671

[PeteWaldo]

Far from Obama's claim that the Muslims of The Islamic State are not Muslims, all the atrocities and barbarities of The Islamic State are all sacred, as in Abu Bakr's example of burning a man alive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rwdOuuaz90