You should watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkbv37ztOoU
I have already watched that video formy. There was much written in the early church including much outright heresy. The reason so much of it was not canonized into scripture is because it contained internal errors such as contradictions within itself, and historical mistakes and such, which demonstrated that it was not divinely inspired. The same thing for Jews and the Old Testament. There was much written that they didn't include in their sacred texts because they recognized them as not being divinely inspired for the same reasons.
Muslims answer to Mohammed's book full of mistakes, errors and contradictions is abrogation (naskh), but that isn't the answer of Jews and Christians to the inspired Word of God.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=116.0I can understand why you are so eager to change the subject, but you really should revisit, and reply to the material in the prior posts first. Particularly those regarding your prophet, and his thievery and his dictates regarding women, as revealed through your own books. Do you think I mischaracterized those suras and the historical record of Mohammed's behavior? If so how?
This is important because Jesus was free of sin, and sent, in part, to provide a perfect example.