Re: Love Your Neighbor

[Mujaheed]

Unrelated discussion split off and continued here
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1938.0

IS THIS POST NOT ABOUT LOVE YOPUR NEIGHBOR
WHAT IF THE NEIGHBOR IS AS WELL INFORMED AS I AM ?

HOW IS THAT NOT RELATED TO THE TOPIC??

[Peter]

You already demonstrated how well informed you are here.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1906.75

[Mujaheed]

You already demonstrated how well informed you are here.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1906.75

NO ID ID NOT AND THE LINK IS JUST BIBLE VERSES THAT IS FILLED WITH THE CONJECTURE OF THE BIBLE SCRIBES It does not say anything conclusive, abouth MAKKAH and the journeys of ABRAHAM and  none of those accounts are verified, we agree where Abraham died but the rest is BIBLE SPECULATION.

YOU SUCH A DEVIOUS PERSON THAT ARGUES ON THE BASIS OF CONJECTURE VEYR WELL, I MUST GIVE YOU THAT. IT HARD TO KEEP TRACK OF THE CONFUSION YOU TRY TO CREATE IN THIS POST WITH NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS< JUST WELL WORDED INSINUATIONS>

[Peter]

We don't need the same topic going on in two separate threads.

[Peter]

Mujaheed, sugar coating blasphemy doesn't make it any less blasphemous. No more posting of Mohammedan blasphemy, that springs from created 7th century Mohammedan fiction, as though it has standing to contradict the 1600 year record of the revelation of God to mankind, until you have made the historical and archaeological case, for Mecca ever having existed, before the Christian era. Your post has been moved to that related thread, as will every other post that contains contradictory blasphemy, against the Word of God.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.0

[Mujaheed]

Mujaheed, sugar coating blasphemy doesn't make it any less blasphemous. No more posting of Mohammedan blasphemy, that springs from created 7th century Mohammedan fiction, as though it has standing to contradict the 1600 year record of the revelation of God to mankind, until you have made the historical and archaeological case, for Mecca ever having existed, before the Christian era. Your post has been moved to that related thread, as will every other post that contains contradictory blasphemy, against the Word of God.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.0
You can reply to this post
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.msg8379#msg8379

THAT IS JUST IT, YOU HAVE TO BRING EVIDENCE FROM MAKKAH THAT YOU ACTUALLY EXCAVATED AND COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING, YOU HAVE A CASE TO PROVE, YOU THINK YOU CAN MAKE STATEMENTS FROM PAGAN HISTORIANS AND ARCHEOLOGISTS THAT NEVER VISITED MAKKAH AND WE HAVE TO BELIEVE YOU, HOW ARROGANT CAN YOU BE??

[Peter]

Mujaheed, sugar coating blasphemy doesn't make it any less blasphemous. No more posting of Mohammedan blasphemy, that springs from created 7th century Mohammedan fiction, as though it has standing to contradict the 1600 year record of the revelation of God to mankind, until you have made the historical and archaeological case, for Mecca ever having existed, before the Christian era. Your post has been moved to that related thread, as will every other post that contains contradictory blasphemy, against the Word of God.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.0
You can reply to this post
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1912.msg8379#msg8379

THAT IS JUST IT, YOU HAVE TO BRING EVIDENCE FROM MAKKAH THAT YOU ACTUALLY EXCAVATED AND COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING, YOU HAVE A CASE TO PROVE, YOU THINK YOU CAN MAKE STATEMENTS FROM PAGAN HISTORIANS AND ARCHEOLOGISTS THAT NEVER VISITED MAKKAH AND WE HAVE TO BELIEVE YOU, HOW ARROGANT CAN YOU BE??

There are over a million artifacts just on display in Jerusalem that attest to the history of THE Holy Land.
1. How do you explain the ABSENCE of artifacts or other archaeological EVIDENCE of a pre-Christian era Mecca - this geographical EPICENTER of Mohammedanism allegedly since Adam?
2. How do you explain that when the historical and archaeological records of other ancient Arabian towns, even tiny towns that came and went in a few hundred years, is so well attested in the historical and archaeological records?