Just like Hagee you believe in:
1. A future tribulation (even though John is my companion in THE tribulation (you will find the definite article "THE" in the Greek).
2. A future antichrist
3. A future false prophet
4. A future role for a physical temple in Jerusalem.
My friend, you may not want to admit that your eschatology springs from John Nelson Darby's, but if that's the case, why do you suppose it is that you share so many fundamentals in common with futurists/dispensationalists?
LOL Hagee?? Don't put me in with him you are DEAD wrong again.
He believes in a pre-trib rapture!
That's not a fundamental of futurism. That was an added frill thanks to Margaret MacDonald. There are lots of futurists that don't believe in a pre-trib rapture.
Yet outside of the minor detail of the length of the tribulation, you share Hagee's eschatology to the T.
I DO NOT!
What you teach is just as dangerous as what he teaches.
You teach the same pretty much just backwards from what he teaches.
No. Pretty much the opposite of what you and Hagee teach, is preterism.
They believe that virtually all of Revelation was fulfilled in, and by, 70 AD and the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem.
My view is the TRADITIONAL continuous-historic context that ALL Jews and Christians understand Old Testament prophecy was fulfilled in, and what the Reformers understood New Testament prophecy and the book of Revelation was being fulfilled in. It was only 20th century pop doctrines like you hold that differ from it.
http://www.beholdthebeast.com/traditional_framework.htmPerhaps worst of all is your abuse of prophecy as if it were intended for you to use it to predict the future.
Believe it or not I have NEVER read or heard any of Darby's teachings. I think you hear some small similarity and assume the rest.
You couldn't have come up with it on your own, because you can't make any more sense of it than Hagee could, if I were engaged in the same conversation with him.
Indeed I think it is at least borderline blasphemy for a Christian not to recognize themselves and the corporate body of Christ to be THE ONLY temples of God in the Christian era.
To suggest that any temple that did get rebuilt, could be desolated, would be to suggest that it could be sanctified in the first place. But it couldn't because JESUS ALREADY REBUILT THE TEMPLE OF GOD.
Here is how I proved Muhammad is NOT the false prophet.
You said the second beast of Rev is Not the false prophet. Well I'm with your friend. The word defines it's self.
Rev 19:20 (KJV) "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."
Do you see that?? The second beast IS the false prophet. It really is that simple.
Read it again. I enlarged the font to help you out.
Two separate entities. The beast (Muhammad's followers - his "kingdom") and the false prophet (Muhammad).