This preface might help us understand what things might have been like for the tribes that YHWH ordered the destruction of.
Just as in the murder, misery and mayhem spread by Muhammadanism all around the world today, Muhammad set the standard for sex with children as well:
Narrated 'aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and
he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). (Book #62, Hadith #64)
http://www.searchtruth.com/searchHadith.php?keyword=aisha+nine+years+old&transla...
No true Muslim would proclaim that sex with a nine year old is off limits or they would be condemning the behavior of their own prophet. The following image could perhaps be much the way 53 year old Muhammad would have appeared with his "wife" 'Aisha:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_YGLQQZTHoU0/Sa6s36hiLkI/AAAAAAAAHq4/T_05gJXnJFA/s400/Muslim_Marriage.jpgWhile raping a child younger than nine may be frowned upon today, that doesn't seem to preclude the Muslim practice of "mufa’khathat", that is having sex with infants and children by "thighing":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RMUyAy9zU0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0eJaXc2IsHowever a highly regarded teacher like Islam's Ayatollah Khomeini, apparently did not consider nine years old an age limit for raping a child, as in this case when he engaged in a one night "temporary marriage" with a 4-5 year old:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfBHEy76W6cThus we find the same spirit driving the Saudi men who gang raped a 3 year old (the demonic spirit of Satan himself - the spirit of antichrist):
https://www.google.com/#q=three+year+old+gang+rape+saudiConsider:
http://www.topix.net/forum/religion/islam/TEUGJF3UEB38R1S7C"Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet.
After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shemary, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421 (Islamic calendar). The inquirer asked the following:
"
It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children (mufa’khathat literally translated means "placing between the thighs" which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, also practiced the "thighing" of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be please with her.
After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply:
It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kufar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the prophet, peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why [the prophet] peace and prayer of Allah be upon him placed his [male] member between her thighs and massaged it softly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his [male] member not like other believers."
Now when I posted regarding the wicked tribes whose destruction Yahweh ordered for the practices of sorcery, spiritism, divination, idolatry, incest, adultery, homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, ritualistic prostitution, and even sacrifice of children to idols, it has been inquired of me as to how I knew they engaged in those activities. I indicated that a web search reveals the historical record and consideration thereof in the writings of scholars.
https://www.google.com/#q=sins+of+the+canaanitesHowever a far better question to ask would have been,
which of those evil practices are not engaged in even today?In part of the account of their destruction we read:
Numbers 31:19
And do ye abide without the camp seven days: whosoever hath killed any person, and whosoever hath touched any slain, purify [both] yourselves and your captives on the third day, and on the seventh day.As if to say "And
if you get any on ya, wash it off!"
Now when we consider the "wide spread" Islamic practice of "mufa’khathat", and Muhammad's own rape of a 9 year old, we can begin to understand the possible extent of diseases that would have been spread throughout a community that engaged in incest, adultery, pedophilia, homosexuality, bestiality, ritualistic prostitution, likely spread across all ages, if the practices of some of today's Muslims are any indication. We can begin to see what life must have been like in an era a few thousand years ago, absent hospitals, medicine, or disease prevention let alone devices to aid in the same.
Yet the Godless with reprobate minds continue to condemn YHWH, for what was actually His mercy, thus simultaneously advocating for the Canaanites, which is advocating for the perpetuation of all of their sins and abominations accounted here to have been taught to and propagated among YHWH's faithful moral people as well. This as opposed to the merciful killing of the whole disease ridden bunch, of which the innocent remain with the Lord today, rather than having to have suffered being indoctrinated into engaging in the abominations of their parents, thereby separating them from the Lord forever. What the Godless are actually advocating for is what were in likelihood even disease ridden infants, to have instead suffered for a whole lifetime before being lost forever, rather than being saved from that fate through the mercy of a loving God.
