Could Arabic be Satan's language?

[PeteWaldo]

Could Arabic be considered to be Satan's language?
Is it a coincidence that the Arabic language didn't arrive on the scene until a little while after the spirit of antichrist did? Even then Arabic didn't enjoy a written form until around 300 AD.
Additionally it remained an obscure language, right up until it was spread by the murderous power of Islam's/Satan's swords.
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2561.0

People are compelled to speak Arabic all over the world because that is the language of the Quran and Islam, yet even in Arabic, about one out of five of the verses in one of the oldest Qurans remain unintelligible:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2576.0
Let alone that the six oldest qurans contradict each other:
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4707.0

Considering the Quran is a direct inversion of the Gospel, as the negative of the Gospel, it would not seem to be a surprise that the spirit of antichrist and the Arabic language are inextricably intertwined.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/islam_is_antichrist.htm

Also unsurprising is the 1400 years of advancing the literal murderous swords of Satan, as opposed to the sword of the Spirit, that God gave us with which to do battle in this Christian era:

Eph 6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

[PeteWaldo]

A link to this video has been on our sites for some time, but in seeing it this time I noticed the language connection:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g4cMjpiBpA&videos=pj_rlfBnpOY

[PeteWaldo]

Fighting Islam itself. Islam has never been misunderstood in the Middle East. There is only one way to characterize Islam, and that is as Islam. Not "radical" or "extremist" but simply Islam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW6Hmrp_1AQ

[bahous]

miserable Pakistani .they  pull you out of misery. and famine so you're ready to do anything for your lords

[PeteWaldo]

miserable Pakistani .they  pull you out of misery. and famine so you're ready to do anything for your lords

All Muslims are enslaved to their Muslim masters and overlords, who even imprison or murder their subjects by State statute, for leaving Islam. Like the citizens that are enslaved to Satan by their Muslim masters in the government of Algeria for example:

"Algeria – While Algeria has no direct laws against apostasy, its laws indirectly cover it. Article 144(2) of Algerian code specifies a prison term to anyone who criticizes or insults the creed or prophets of Islam through writing, drawing, declaration, or any other means; further, Algerian law makes conversion from Islam and proselytizing by non-Muslims an offense punishable with fine and prison term.[10]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy#Where_punished

Outside of those that are being slaughtered by orthodox Muslims around so much of the world today, nobody has more reason to be "Islamophobic" than Muhammad's followers themselves.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/islamophobia_or_christian_love.htm

[ps49]

It's always easier to blame others for your own plight.  It gives you something to fight for rather than something to work for.

Genesis 4:2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel.

Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. 3 In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord. 4 And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, 5 but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.

6 Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.”

8 Now Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let’s go out to the field.”[d] While they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.

9 Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?”

“I don’t know,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

[PeteWaldo]

bahous, I warned you repeatedly about copy and pasting incompatible HTML tags from other forum software. Didn't you notice something was technologically very wrong, after you posted it? Why couldn't you have been responsible enough to edit out the bad HTML tags yourself?
Your brief post went straight in the trash. No need to look for it in the spam section.

[bahous]

Paul was a liar

[ps49]

Paul was a liar

What lie did Paul speak? What specifically did he say that you find untruthful?

[PeteWaldo]

Paul was a liar

What lie did Paul speak? What specifically did he say that you find untruthful?

ps49, did you forget all of his dithering on and preposterous conclusions that you replied to in the other thread?
http://www.islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=4807.msg18573#msg18573

In typical forum Muslim fashion, after seeing Muhammad exposed undeniably as a "messenger" of Satan, and understanding the actual source of his beliefs and pagan rituals, he spammed the very same post into the other thread one minute apart from his posting it in this thread. He also spammed it as a separate thread that I moved to spam.
Once they see the undeniable truth, they turn to breaking the promise they made when they joined the forum to engage in an exchange, and instead ignore, snipe, run away, ignore, snipe and run away, again and again, until disciplinary measures have to be taken to press them to uphold their promise. Their effort then turns to breaking the forum rule as egregiously as possible so that disciplinary action is the only solution, so that after their wasted repetitive posts are moved to spam, they can follow it with empty claims and catcalls like "you are a liar - you prove it clearly in removing my post".

Bahous will not be well served if we allow him to continue to ignore our responses to him, and waste any more of all of our time with his preposterous conclusions and blasphemy against Paul, and his even anti-Islam proclamation that Muhammad was the Messiah.
We need to focus on impressing him with the fact that, because he follows Muhammad alone, he must deny Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and the whole subject of the Gospel as well. This even though the hypocrite he follows told the people of the Gospel to go by what God has revealed therein. He must reject all of the prophets and witnesses of the one true God as revealed in the scriptures, to follow a single 7th century mass-murdering thief. If you are interested in his false conclusions about Paul please revisit that thread. But he needs to be pressed to respond to all of the points we made that he ignored. No need to clutter this thread with repetition of the same.

[ps49]

I suppose I just wanted to have one last go at getting something intelligible out of bahous. On reflection you are probably right though. He doesn't really seem interested in hearing the Gospels with an open mind. On the other hand, Paul's writings easily rank as the most difficult NT passages to understand (excepting Revelation of course!) and I wonder if that's why he seems to focus on him? Or perhaps there is a more sinister reason for trying to isolate and discredit the Apostle to the Gentiles?

[PeteWaldo]

I suppose I just wanted to have one last go at getting something intelligible out of bahous. On reflection you are probably right though. He doesn't really seem interested in hearing the Gospels with an open mind. On the other hand, Paul's writings easily rank as the most difficult NT passages to understand (excepting Revelation of course!) and I wonder if that's why he seems to focus on him? Or perhaps there is a more sinister reason for trying to isolate and discredit the Apostle to the Gentiles?

He's just parroting his fellow antichrist's demonization of Paul, because it's what they do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuAdmZIoR8c
Yet they are always struck mute and flatfooted when it's pointed out to them that they must reject Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and the whole subject of the Gospel as well. Let alone that it is John that labels them as antichrists.