From the 19th century Catholic critics and by the Protestant saw in the book of Mark a solid document to rewrite sane history of Jesus ,based on scientific evidence , far from the marvelous of Mathiew and the work of synthesis did by Luc h and apologetic purpose of John.
Marc is John Paul's companion in his first missionary journey. Acts tells us that John called Mark cut short his trip with Paul and promptly returned to Jerusalem.
just after his return (he would have submitted its report against Paul and his dangerous tendency to the message of the Gospel) the first council met.
for ample information he is the nephew of Barnabas (famous for its well known gospel of Muslims).
this is the book where the title "Son of God" appears more sparingly.
Mark insinuates that this title is satanic; it occurs in his gospel on the mouth of demons (of Djins), or the mouth of demons (men).
Here the study:
I- on the mouth of demons (Djins)
Marc3 / 11: 11 And the unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and cried, saying, Thou art the Son of God
Marc 5/7 "7 and, crying with a loud voice, he said: What is it between you and me, Jesus, Son of God Most High * I charge you by God, do not torment me? not.
II- on the lips of men demons
Marc 14/61: 61 And he was silent, and answered nothing. The priest still questioned, and said: Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? *
Marc15 / 39: "39 And the centurion, who stood vis-a-vis him, seeing that he had expired and shouting, saying, Certainly this was the Son of God.
Marc and 1/1 "1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God" is adulterated all learned Christians agreed that these two words do not exist in holy manuscript. (It is a forgery)
the recap: four times appears the title of the Son of God pronounced by the devils and demons men.
that honor you dear Christian to be taught by S.atan
