Now,Brother Pete, do you believe that the Bible that is existing now have errors?
or modified? I think you don't even many Christians does.
I believe there perhaps are a small handful of scribal errors
that do not change the meanings of the passages in which they are found in any significant way whatsoever. One reason it has been handed down very much intact, as confirmed by the discovery of the dead sea scrolls, is Hebrew scribal methodology.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=97.0Since I am English speaking, and my King James Version is a translation from Hebrew and Greek (and a little Syriac), there are a few words that might have been translated better. That's why I use Greek/English and Hebrew/English interlinears and Strong's definitions to help me understand more fully. Though
none of these minor translation errors fundamentally change the passages in which they are found. The many many hundreds of passages, that
the WITNESSES of Yahshua penned, that are THE EXACT OPPOSITE of what the STAND-ALONE false prophet Mohammed contradicted 500 years later, are truth.
But a person doesn't need to be a scholar, or even to have read the whole Bible, since all a person
needs to know about the Gospel, and believe with their whole heart about Yahshua, is this one-verse summary of the Gospel ...
John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.And what about the Quran? Consider the false, and 7th and 8th century pure historical fiction, of Islam.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.0Even Mohammed knew what a mess he made of his own recitations.
2:106 (Asad)
Any message which, We annul or consign to oblivion We replace with a better or a similar one. Dost thou not know that God has the power to will anything?http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=116.0Does that read like divine inspiration, or the changing whims of a self-serving "prophet", who even cut himself in for 1/5 of the property stolen from others, just like a Mafia Don.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=951.0You have now been shown the only plausible answer to this thread. Mohammed's earlier recitations are rendered as nothing more than garbage, because they are abrogated by his later, violent ones. That's why
true Muslims are targeting innocents for murder all around the world, just like Mohammed did.
Verses like those in the original post must be ignored and contradicted.
That's why you suffer under the delusion that you can throw out 3/4 of the Gospel, and preposterously and falsely pretend that the remaining 1/4, that doesn't specifically and directly contradict Mohammed's STAND-ALONE RECORD, somehow serve Mohammedanism. Why not read the Gospel for yourself?
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/gospel_of_john.htmTry this. Why not start with the First Epistle of John, from the same version Deedat pretended to quote from, and see if you agree with Deedat that it confirms Mohammed as a true prophet, and not an antichrist.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=273.01John 5:10
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.