As is the case most of the time you missed the point I was trying to demonstrate, that the conjecture leads to further unfounded accusations based on the way the question is posed in the first place.[/quote]
What you made was an unsupportable accusation that Resistingrexmundi was a potential murderer when he is the exact opposite. That isn't making a point.
STILL NOT GETTING THE POINT, CALM DOWN AND READ MY POSTS CAREFULLY OR SHOULD I ENGAGE IN MUCH SIMPLER ARGUMENTS WITH YOU?
We end up in a futile argument over a hypothetical question. You do realize that it all started as a hypothetical question and not an interogation of resistingrexmundi's character.
Then I'll defer to him to correct me if he is of the same opinion.
The reason I did this and in most of the thread is to demonstrate the danger of conjecture, speculation based on absurd statements and allegations.
The prophet Muhammad is not a liar, ........
I said murderer, as well documented in your books. Regarding lying we will visit taqiyyah once your posting privileges are restored.
...... nor did he retain a pagan idol, .....
The pagans venerated the very same black stone. No need to beat that dead horse here.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1906.0..... nor did he instruct reverence for the black stone ......
You even squander good money to travel to it to march around it 7 times and claim you don't have a reverence for it? Paaallllleeeezzzze. That's patently false as has already been beaten to death. Again my friend, simply saying something doesn't magically make it come true.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1906.msg8066#msg8066 ....... nor do we worship like the kafir (DISBELIEVERS) it is your own lack of understanding that leads you to these assumptions based on deviant scholars as I have proven over and over and over again.
No it is your own stunning self-delusion and wishful thinking that blinds you to the fact. That fact is, of course, obvious.
I am not differing with the Book only where the book contradicts itself ......
Nothing but more lies. You reject the book because it differs with Mohammed's 7th century record.
....... and I understand it to be scholars writing in there time for there time according to limited knowledge they had and subsequent translators interpreting the Bookaccording to their beliefs.
The fact is the ones present
were the ONLY ones with knowledge OF THEIR TIME.
That's what makes the 7th and 8th century Mohammedan fiction such preposterous nonsense.
[/quote]
I REJECT THE BOOK (OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK) AS IT IS JUST A BOOK AS ANY OTHER WRITTEN FROM THE HEARTS MINDS OF MEN WITH POLITICAL AGENDAS. IT IS TRANSLATED AND DEVIATED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO DISCERN BETWEEN TRUTH AND FALSEHOOD. FURTHER DISTORTED BY POPULAR OPINIONS LIKE YOURSELF>
