Author Topic: Chat with Psychlopes May 2011  (Read 10321 times)

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Chat with Psychlopes May 2011
« on: May 20, 2011, 12:22:33 PM »
5-18

الله هو الحب - الانجيل

http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=71.0

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2011, 12:24:24 PM »
5-19 psy

Say [O Prophet]: "If you Love God, follow me, [and] God will Love you and forgive you your sins; for God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace." - Quran

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2011, 12:25:49 PM »
5-19

[[[[Say [O Prophet]: "If you Love God, follow me, [and] God will Love you and forgive you your sins; for God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace." - Quran]]]]]

http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I AM THE WAY, the truth, and the life: NO MAN cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Mat 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

sent with "the blood"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK3Rgcw5lDw

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2011, 12:26:51 PM »
5-19 psy

So is it "Born again" or "Born from above"?

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2011, 12:38:26 PM »
5-19 psy

And why do you think quoting the Bible would affect me, when I already believe the Bible isn't the inerrant "unadulterated" word of God.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2011, 12:46:57 PM »
5-19

[[[[So is it "Born again" or "Born from above"?]]]]

Didn't you read it?
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

One must be born in the Spirit of God.
Born again believers are the temple of God.

1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and [that] the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? 17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which [temple] ye are.

Jhn 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Jhn 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

1 Peter 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, 21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God. 22 Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, [see that ye] love one another with a pure heart fervently: 23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

sent "temple of God"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMXGmHiNUyU

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2011, 12:47:22 PM »
5-19

[[[[And why do you think quoting the Bible would affect me, when I already believe the Bible isn't the inerrant "unadulterated" word of God.]]]]

By the 7th century the Gospel had been translated into every popular language, copied perhaps a hundred thousand times, and had been read all over the known world for centuries. In that same 7th century Muhammad quipped...

Sura 5:47 Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/

So are you saying that Muhammad was just more ignorant than you are, to have committed such a catastrophic blunder?

sent "is islam a religion?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujUOZyrnewE

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2011, 12:48:40 PM »
5-20 psy

Read "Jesus Interrupted" and/or "Misquoting Jesus" my friend, all academic scriptural and textual analysis, no theology and no bias, and get to know "EXACTLY" how corrupt the Bible is.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2011, 12:49:19 PM »
5-20 psy

Unless if you're too scared to do so, which I would understand from a blind believer, but not a seeker of truth. Your choice.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2011, 12:55:47 PM »
5-20

[[[[Read "Jesus Interrupted" and/or "Misquoting Jesus" my friend, all academic scriptural and textual analysis, no theology and no bias, and get to know "EXACTLY" how corrupt the Bible is.]]]]]

This coming from a follower of Muhammad?

"Gerd Puin, THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography, studying the oldest manuscripts, speaks with disdain about the willingness of Muslims and non-Muslims alike, to accept Islamic dogma. He says: "The Qur'an claims for itself that it is 'mubeen,' or clear, but if you just look at it, you will see that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn't make sense. Many Muslims will tell you otherwise, but the fact is that a fifth of the Qur'an is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Qur'an is not comprehensible, if it can't even be understood in Arabic, then it's not translatable into any language. That is why Muslims are afraid. Since the Qur'an claims repeatedly to be clear but is not—there is an obvious and serious contradiction. Something else must be going on."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerd_R._Puin

And of course the "something else going on" is that the antichrist inspiration for Muhammadanism, comes straight out of the pit of hell, through Satan's prophet Muhammad. Through the rituals of 2nd century occult cult of the Sabians, and the Quraish moon, sun, star and jinn-devil worshipers.

sent "sabians" video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR3Bla8YwbU

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2011, 12:57:15 PM »
5-20

[[[[Unless if you're too scared to do so, which I would understand from a blind believer, but not a seeker of truth. Your choice.]]]]

My friend, I have a whole website devoted to the historical, archaeological and geographical records of Yahweh's record and the Muhammadan record. I input some Google searches so that the reader does not need to rely on any opinion of mine.
http://www.historyofmecca.com/

You speak of blind belief, even as you must necessarily reject scripture, history, archaeology and physical geography to buy into what can only be labeled Islamic "tradition", that poses as thousands of years of pre-muhammad history, that was created by a semi-literate SW Arabian desert dweller named Ibn Ishak, in an effort to put create some context to Muhammad incoherent disjointed ramblings. Even worse you believe in flying donkey mules solely because Muhammad declared he took a fanciful trip on one, from Mecca, to Jerusalem to "paradise" and back to Mecca by morning, yet NOT A SINGLE PERSON ever witnessed his magical flying steed.

The simple FACT OF THE MATTER IS that the 2nd century occult cult of the Sabians, prayed 5 times a day, performed ablution, fasted for 30 days beginning with the sighting of the crescent moon, and wore long white robes. Sound familiar? Muhammad was so caught up in this occult cult through 4 of his relatives, that the Quraish often referred to him simply as "the Sabian". He mentions this occult cult right along side Christians and Jews.

You believe the pure fictional 7th century Ibn Ishak created poppycock, edited and embellished in the 8th century by guys like Hisham, Tabari and Bukhari, even as the historical, geographical and particularly archaeological records, evermore increasingly defend scripture as being a reliable record of ancient history, and prove Islamic "tradition" to be the fraud that it cannot be denied that it is.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=68.0

copy "sabians" video again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR3Bla8YwbU

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2011, 12:59:24 PM »
5-20

So tell me. How did Ibn Ishak know what went on with Adam, so many thousands of years, before the 7th century AD?

sent with "ask your imam"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFhhU8sQBlg

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2011, 12:59:50 PM »
5-20 psy

As for Sura 5:47 ... LOL.
I guess you didn't read the very next verse, being the blind parrot of anti-Islamic sites that you are...

"5:48 (Asad) And unto thee [O Prophet] have We vouchsafed this divine writ, setting forth the truth, confirming the truth of whatever there still remains of earlier revelations and determining what is true therein. [64] Judge, then, between the followers of earlier revelation in accordance with what God has bestowed from on high, [65] and do not follow their errant views, forsaking the truth that has come unto thee. Unto every one of you have We appointed a [different] law and way of life."


And to put your mind at ease, that verse was sent to instruct the prophet to let Christians and Jews arbitrate according to their laws and not Shari'a, which if anything just goes to show that Islam isn't trying to shove it's laws down people's throats.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2011, 06:58:58 AM »
5-20

"THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography" LOOOOOL , yeah HE WISH,

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2011, 06:59:38 AM »
5-21

First off , who said he was "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography," ??? only anti-Islamic sites claim that. Second of all, he was a specialist in Calligraphy and Paleography, not a specialist in the Arabic language, one of the most complex languages on the face of the earth, You want to claim that a German had better understanding of the Arabic language that the Arabs themselves? I'm an Arab, and reading through the Quran I see nothing "incomprehensible" in it.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2011, 07:26:16 AM »
5-21

[[[["THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography" LOOOOOL , yeah HE WISH,]]]]

As a follower of Muhammad the whole world must be judged a lie to you, because the spirit of antichrist inverted your reality. You believe lies are truth, and so truth must necessarily be called a lie. That's why you were compelled to create your own reality, aside from the facts, in your above statement. This is because you follow the father of lies through his prophet.
Why don't you try answering some of the questions I asked? Like...

"So tell me. How did Ibn Ishak know what went on with Adam, so many thousands of years, before the 7th century AD?"

To begin to see how ridiculous it is for bunch of semi-literate SW Arabian desert dwellers to have attempted to create thousands of years of pre-Muhammad history from scratch, according to Ishak there were 40 generations between Ishmael and Muhammad. Since there are 2670 years that spanned the distance between these two men, that would mean that there are 66 years in an Arabian generation.
Does that make sense to you when Muhammad himself was doing a 9 year old?

http://www.petewaldo.com/origins_of_islam.htm

sent with "muhammad's genealogy"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOXTS9lahKs

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2011, 08:19:28 AM »
5-21 psy (no need to read it here since it is quoted in it's entirety in reply)

First off , who said he was "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography," ??? only anti-Islamic sites claim that. Second of all, he was a specialist in Calligraphy and Paleography, not a specialist in the Arabic language, one of the most complex languages on the face of the earth, You want to claim that a German had better understanding of the Arabic language that the Arabs themselves? I'm an Arab, and reading through the Quran I see nothing "incomprehensible" in it.
________________________

Reply 5-21

[[[[First off , who said he was "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography," ??? only anti-Islamic sites claim that.]]]]

Sure. Like only Islamic sites can tell us what the one true God Yahweh is all about.

[[[[Second of all, he was a specialist in Calligraphy and Paleography, not a specialist in the Arabic language, one of the most complex languages on the face of the earth, ...]]]]

The Arabic spoken today is that of Muhammad's pagan tribe the Quraish, and is quite a modern language on the world stage. It supplanted the native tongues throughout the Arabian peninsula, through Muhammadan imperialistic conquest. Besides...

"And most every important religious word, concept, and name used in the Qur'an was derived from Syriac, the language of Syrian Christians in the 6th century."
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1693.0

[[[[[You want to claim that a German had better understanding of the Arabic language that the Arabs themselves?]]]]

Simply declaring the opposite of FACTS, with personal presumption that springs from ignorance, will never change THE FACTS. Does an expert geneticist have to be born to a father that was a specialist at genetics? Of course not. A person becomes a a specialist they shine above the others in the pursuit of a particular field. You wouldn't have to suffer the embarrassment if you copy and pasted the links I provide.

"Gerd Rüdiger Puin (born 1940) is a German scholar and an authority on Qur'anic historical orthography, the study and scholarly interpretation of ancient manuscripts. He is also specialist in Arabic paleography. He was a lecturer of Arabic at Saarland University, in Saarbrücken Germany."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerd_R._Puin

Because the SW Arabian desert dwellers remain relatively so ignorant to this day, Gerd Puin was COMMISSIONED BY THE YEMENI GOVERNMENT precisely because of his expertise. Yemen is, of course, where Muhammad's tribe migrated from to Mecca, after Mecca had been first settled in around the 4th century AD. Earlier, his tribe most likely made their way to the Arabian peninsula, initially, from Ethiopia.

"Gerd Puin was the head of a restoration project, commissioned by the Yemeni government, which spent a significant amount of time examining the ancient Qur'anic manuscripts discovered in Sana'a, Yemen, in 1972, in order to find criteria for systematically cataloging them. According to writer Toby Lester, his examination revealed "unconventional verse orderings, minor textual variations, and rare styles of orthography and artistic embellishment."[1] The scriptures were written in the early Hijazi Arabic script, matching the pieces of the earliest Qur'ans known to exist. Some of the papyrus on which the text appears shows clear signs of earlier use, being that previous, washed-off writings are also visible on it. In 2008 and 2009 Dr Elisabeth Puin published detailed results of the analysis of Sanaa manuscript DAM (dar al-makhtutat) 01.27-1 proving that the text was still in flux in the time span between the scriptio inferior and the scriptio superior of the palimpsest (Ein Frueher Koranpalimpsest aus San'a', part 1 in Schlaglichter 2008, part 2 in Vom Koran zum Islam 2009, both ed. Markus Gross and Karl-Heinz Ohlig, Verlag Hans Schiler Berlin).

More than 15,000 sheets of the Yemeni Qur'ans have painstakingly been cleaned, treated, sorted, cataloged and photographed and 35,000 microfilmed photos have been made of the manuscripts. Some of Puin's initial remarks on his findings are found in his essay titled the "Observations on Early Qur'an Manuscripts in San'a" which has been republished in the book What the Koran Really Says by Ibn Warraq."

[[[[[I'm an Arab, and reading through the Quran I see nothing "incomprehensible" in it.]]]]]

Then you must know that the various Arabic dialects are so diverse from each other as to nearly render each other beyond understanding. This is why when a person is getting a book translated it's best to use a Jordanian, since that is the dialect that is understood more broadly throughout the Arab world more than others.

However, firstly the Quran you have in your hands, is not the same as the oldest available manuscript from which Puin worked.

Secondly all of the various versions of the Quran were collected up, and a preferred version retained, and the rest of the variations burned. Uthman and his boys edited the retained version, but as you well know the Quran still remains a preposterous mess, requiring abrogation of a whopping 71 out of only 114 suras.

"During the reign of Khalif Uthman (the third Khalifah),  reports
reached him that in various parts of Syria, Armenia and Iraq, Muslims
were reciting the Koran differently from the way it was being recited by
Arabian Muslims. Uthman immediately sent for the manuscript in Hafsa's
possession and ordered Zaid Ibn Thabit and three others, Abdullah Ibn
Zubair, Said Ibn Al-As and Abdullah Al-Rahman Ibn Harith B. Hisham to
make copies of the text and make corrections where necessary. When
these were completed, we  read that Uthman took violent action
regarding other existing Koranic manuscripts:

"Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they
had copied and ordered that all the other koranic materials,
whether written in fragmentary manuscripts, whole copies, to
be burnt." (Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 6 Page 479).

To  eliminate  variant  readings  and  contradictions,  all  other manuscripts were indeed burned, but the Uthmanic edition itself was not perfect and met with a similar fate. When Marwan was governor of Medina, he ordered Hafsa's manuscript to be destroyed. The only reasonable conclusion one can have is that during Uthman's time, some of the contradictions in Hafsa's text were so glaring that a total destruction of it was called for rather than a revision. From then until now, conflicting passages and historical inaccuracies exist within the  Koranic texts.

The Deedats, the Joommals, and the so-called Sheiks continue their unwarranted attack on the Bible while suppressing the fact that Khalif Uthman burned all the Koranic manuscripts apart from Hafsa's, and that Governor Marwan followed the example of Uthman by destroying the Hafsa text as well. Anyone with the slightest regard for truth would have to admit that the Textus Receptus of the Koran now in circulation is a far cry from the textus originalis! It  is not too wild to suggest that were Muhammad alive at the time of these incidents, he would have received one of his usual "revelations" to back up those burnings."
http://www.beholdthebeast.com/textual_history_of_the_koran.htm

Now compare that fast and loose "preservation" of Muhammad's ramblings with the methods of the scribes.

"To suggest there was tampering to the Old Testament documents prior to 300 B.C. shows a misunderstanding of Israelite scribal methodology and of their reverence for the Scriptures. First of all, biblical scrolls were written on the inside only to prevent any smudging or smearing that might lead to a misreading of the text. When being copied -- besides many parallel readings -- the copy was compared with the original in every way humanly possible.

The words in each column were counted and then the letters. The first, last, and middle letter and word in each column had to be identical to the original. If the number of words or the number of letters of the copy differed from the original, the copy was destroyed. Then they counted the words and letters in the whole document. They divided the document into quarters and into eighths. The first, last and middle letter in each section had to be the same. The number of words and the number of letters in each section had to be the same.  The middle word and the middle letter in each section had to be the same, and they had to be the same for the whole document. If not, the copy was destroyed. Not corrected, but destroyed!"

http://www.beholdthebeast.com/bible_manuscript_errors_.htm

sent "Quran and abrogation"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsPA_FZCjws

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2011, 08:24:20 AM »
[[[[[[[First off , who said he was "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography," ??? only anti-Islamic sites claim that.]]]]

Since when did Wikipedia become an "anti-Islamic site"? You, just like anyone else, are more than welcome to contradict the article WITH FACTS. The reason the article stands, is because it is factual. It's A FACT that Puin was COMMISSIONED BY THE YEMENI GOVERNMENT specifically for his expertise.

sent with "Quran inspiration"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEYbJxylA2s

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psy
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2011, 09:32:35 AM »
Revisiting your early reply

5-19 psy

Say [O Prophet]: "If you Love God, follow me, [and] God will Love you and forgive you your sins; for God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace." - Quran

But then Muhammad's alter-ego "Allah" also condemns folks from before conception, to provide fodder for his personal torturing pleasure, in the hell of Muhammad's imagination.

Sahih Muslim, Book 32, Number 6436:
Narrated Aisha:
'A'isha, the mother of the believers, said that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) was called to lead the funeral prayer of a child of the Ansar. I said: Allah's Messenger, there is happiness for this child who is a bird from the birds of paradise for it committed no sin nor has he reached the age when one can commit sin. He said: 'A'isha, per adventure, it may be otherwise, because God created for paradise those who are fit for it while they were yet in their father's loins and created for Hell those who are to go to Hell. He created them for Hell while they were yet in their father's loins.  (Book #033, Hadith #6436)

No so-called Islamic "conversion" can change predestination.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2165.0

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2011, 07:24:59 AM »
5-21 psy (no need to read it here since it is quoted in it's entirety in reply)

Let's ask Wikipedia then, shall we??

Wiki says "is a German scholar and an authority on Qur'anic historical orthography".

So how did you transform that into "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography,"

I guess, lying is in your blood, after all it's what Paul instructs you to do "For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?"

And as for presumptions and facts, you're the one making presumptions, I'm the one with the facts. You obviously don't speak a word of Arabic yet you presume to know enough to criticize the Quran. LOL. What a fool you are.

Anyway, you're the one who contacted you, I don't want much to do with you and your arguments, I've heard them all before a thousand times and I've refuted people like you a thousand times. But I'm out of that game, go find another sucker to fool, as the Quran says

"O you who deny the truth! I do not worship that which you worship, and neither do you worship that which I worship! And I will not worship that which you have [ever] worshiped, and neither will you [ever] worship that which I worship. Unto you, your moral law, and unto me, mine !"

So, enjoy your faith, I hope it takes you to salvation. And leave me be, I've got more important things to do with my life than to argue with those who initiate discussions without any intention of actually being objective or even "rational". You're not looking for the truth, you're looking for justification for your faith which is seriously threatened "theologically" by Islam, and to do so, you try to poke holes in the hull of Islam. But, alas, you'll never succeed. Let's agree to disagree, and let's make it a point to meet in the afterlife and compare notes. As for now, I've got work to do and deadlines to meet, and reading your rhetoric takes too much of my valuable time. Consider yourself blocked.... that is, once I remember how that is done here on youTube.

Cheers,

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2011, 07:25:38 AM »
5-21 psy (no need to read it here since it is quoted in it's entirety in reply)

One last thing, you said, "The Arabic spoken today is that of Muhammad's pagan tribe the Quraish"

LOL.... DUH! you figured that one out on your own???? of course it isn't!!! we speak slang vernacular Arabic, but we study Standard Arabic at schools, AS WELL AS, Archaic Arabic through learning the Quran, so every Arabic who reads the Quran understands it, save for a few words here and there that one might need to open the dictionary to look up the definition for. Just like when you read Shakespeare. Are you trying to tell me that the English speaking learned people are not equipped to understand Shakespeare because "it's not the spoken dialect", as you put it???????

Get a life!!!!!!!

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2011, 07:51:48 AM »
5-21

[[[[[Let's ask Wikipedia then, shall we??

Wiki says "is a German scholar and an authority ........]]]]]

Then he is by your own admission deemed an "authority".

[[[[[...... on Qur'anic historical orthography".

So how did you transform that into "THE WORLD'S LEADING SPECIALIST in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography,"]]]]]

That detail of the quote was from Craig Winn. You are trifling in unnecessary detail, to lodge an empty accusation, whereas I found it easy to rely on Winn in light of the EVIDENCE.
If Puin wasn't the world's leading specialist, then why did the YEMENI GOVERNMENT TRUST HIM to be the one to handle the oldest Quranic manuscripts rather than some local Arab? Because he was the cheapest?

[[[[I guess, lying is in your blood, after all it's what Paul instructs you to do "For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?"]]]]]

Sadly you damn yourself by following Ahmed Deedat, rather than simply reading the Gospel. If you had read the very next verse you wouldn't have had to leap to such a foolish and false presumption.

Rom 3:7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? 8 And not [rather], (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=337.0

Paul tells us that those that do evil that good may come, like those engaged in the Quran and Muhammad inspired imperialistic slaughter of non-muslim innocents that believe murder is for good, are damned. You see what you did? You made yourself just another slanderous reporter.
But your false accusation is predictable as it was prophesied

2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.    2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,    3  Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

as well as the blasphemy of THE false prophet Muhammad's Islamic kingdom beast

Rev 13:6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=12.0

[[[[And as for presumptions and facts, you're the one making presumptions, I'm the one with the facts.]]]]

If you are the one with the facts, then why is it you haven't been able to produce a single shred, of scriptural, historical, archaeological or geographical evidence, that suggests that Mecca ever existed before the 4th century AD when pagan immigrants from Yemen settled it, or evidence that their Kaaba existed before the early 5th century when those pagans built it for Arabian Star Family and jinn-devil worship?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=56.0

[[[[ You obviously don't speak a word of Arabic yet you presume to know enough to criticize the Quran. LOL. What a fool you are.]]]]

One doesn't need to know a word of Arabic to understand that the Quran criticizes itself, with a whopping 71 out of only 114 suras subject to abrogation. In other words, earlier suras turned into lies by later suras, by Muhammad's confused alter-ego "Allah".

2:106 (Asad) Any message which, We annul or consign to oblivion We replace with a better or a similar one. Dost thou not know that God has the power to will anything?

Thus the earlier slightly more peaceful drivel that Muhammad uttered, that apostates like you WISH represented Muhammadanism, are cast aside for the later post-hijra "stages" of Muhammad's "revelations" that call for violence against non-muslims, and theft of their property, through imperialistic conquest and slaughter. This is because Muhammadanism could not stand the light of truth in the 7th century, any more than it can today.
Same reason there have been over 17,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world, just since 9-11.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Surah 16:101 When We substitute one revelation for another, and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages), they say, "Thou art but a forger": but most of them understand not.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=116.0

That is Muhammad's post-hijra suras that call for violence against all non-muslims as the later "stages" that abrogate his earlier peaceful drivel.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2276.0

Surah 9.29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Indeed it is binding on all Muslims to fight and slay non-muslims

Sura 9.111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.

That is, of course a lie though, regarding the Gospel.

[[[[Anyway, you're the one who contacted you, .....]]]]]

I initiated the contact because I noticed your ID on YouTube again and your Arabic language speaking, and it struck me that since you are already a forum member, I would introduce you to our new Arabic category in hopes that you would get to know the love of the one true God, as manifest in our Savior Yeshua, through all of the Old and New Testament prophecy of His crucifixion, death and resurrection - in Arabic.

[[[[[.... I don't want much to do with you and your arguments, I've heard them all before a thousand times and I've refuted people like you a thousand times.]]]]

If that were the case, then why do you continue to embrace and recommend an agnostic who readily admits that Jesus Christ was crucified?
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2557.msg10483#msg10483
I would think that after the first of the "thousand times" you "refuted" people with Ehrman you would stop recommending him, since Muhammadanism requires you to embrace the gnostic doctrine of Simon the Magician of Sumaria that claimed it only appeared that Jesus was crucified.

Simply declaring you refuted someone, does not make it magically come true, any more than believing in flying donkey-mules will magically make them be true. I put a record of our chat in the forum for your review.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2557.0

I don't see a single refutation in your empty words. For example, where did you present some scriptural, historical, archaeological or geographical evidence that suggests that Mecca ever existed before the 4th century AD when pagan immigrants from Yemen settled the area, to refute THE FACT that there is none?

The reason you are stuck having to run to the embrace an agnostic, who you yourself have must necessarily judge a liar, as if that individual has authority over thousands of years of Judeo/Christian authorship, scholarship and apologetics, is because to follow Muhammad requires you to believe that the 1600 year record of Yahweh to mankind through ALL of His prophets and witnesses, is a lie. This, in order to join the 23 year 7th century cult of a single individual, who is undeniably revealed through his stand-alone 7th century record, as an imperialistic conquering, murdering, female prisoner abusing, child doing, thief.

A false prophet, that declared the EXACT OPPOSITE, of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel.

Even your agnostic hero Ehrman confirms that Jesus was crucified.
No crucifixion, death and resurrection to save us from sin, no Gospel. Yet the crucifixion of Jesus Christ was even prophesied many hundreds of years in advance. And that prior prophecy was cited by Jesus Christ Himself, when He prophesied His own crucifixion.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm

Even Ehrman doesn't agree with the gnostic doctrine of Simon the Magician (later known as "Simonianism"), who originated the preposterous and historically untenable gnostic heresy of it only having appeared that Jesus was crucified, that Muhammad's wife Khadijah's cousin Waraqa bin Naufal, the Ebionite occult priest, presented to Muhammad.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2475.0

Psy, the support and comfort you seek to find in your agnostic hero Bart D. Ehrman evaporates, when you must necessarily consider him to be a liar as well, in order to continue to follow Muhammad. Ehrman confirms the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, as, of course, does the historical record.
Quoting, http://www.answering-islam.org/authors/thompson/bart_ehrman_hero.html

"For this reason the supposed hero of Islam, Bart Ehrman rejects Islam’s position that Jesus wasn’t crucified and he has openly stated that he believes Jesus was crucified according to the available data. In his work ‘The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings,’ he states:

In any event, Tacitus's report confirms what we know from other sources, that Jesus was executed by order of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate.2

So it seems that the hero for Islam agrees with the Christians about Jesus being crucified. This is valuable information and is very useful to bring up to anyone who touts Ehrman as the hero of Islam."
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2558.0

But the reason that you, and Ehrman, cannot see the kingdom of God, as I pointed out early on, is because you have not been born again. For this reason, you cannot understand the things of the Spirit of God, and you won't, as long as you put your effort into MISunderstanding.

1Cr 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.

Indeed you spend your life running and hiding from the truth, whether scriptural, historical, archaeological, or geographical, while engaging in thinly repackaged Sabian occult, and Quraish pagan Star Family and jinn-devil worship, to follow an imperialistic conquering, murdering, female captive abusing, child doing, thief. Doesn't that ever strike you as a little peculiar?

I am here to preach Christ crucified.

1Cr 1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

Antichrists efforts are to reject it.
___________________________________

I generally begin replying before completely reading a PM, so I don't have to read it twice. So when I am surprised by someone being so afraid of truth that they block me, the PM gets lost, and I have to spend the time to try to reconstruct it. I go through the trouble because I wanted to be sure to include the entirety of his replies in here.

The above discussion highlights the problem when the light of truth is shined on Muhammadanism. We have to pray for these poor folks. To leave Islam results in their being rejected by their family and friends, loosing their inheritance, and their jobs from Muslim employers. In some cases even their lives, even by the hand of their own mother and father.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2011, 11:37:49 AM »
Anyway, you're the one who contacted you, I don't want much to do with you and your arguments, I've heard them all before a thousand times and I've refuted people like you a thousand times. But I'm out of that game, go find another sucker to fool, ......

This even as the poor fellow is compelled to believe Muhammad's unwitnessed tall tale of riding a flying donkey-mule from Mecca, to Jerusalem to "paradise" and back to Mecca by morning, and fables of talking ants and birds.
http://www.petewaldo.com/fables_fantasies.htm

....... as the Quran says

"O you who deny the truth! I do not worship that which you worship, and neither do you worship that which I worship! And I will not worship that which you have [ever] worshiped, and neither will you [ever] worship that which I worship. Unto you, your moral law, and unto me, mine !"

At least you don't suffer under the delusion that we worship the same God, Yahweh. Muhammad was correct in recognizing the irreconcilable differences (in fact Islam is the EXACT OPPOSITE) and that one must choose.

That choice being between the law of the perfect and sinless Messiah, the Prince of Peace, the Lamb of God, through ALL of the prophets and witnesses of the 1600 year record of Yahweh to mankind, that His people have followed through 2 covenants for 3500 years.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm

Mark 12:29  And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments [is], Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: 30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment.  31 And the second [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Or the STAND-ALONE law of A SINGLE 7th century murdering, prisoner abusing, child doing, thieving illiterate who declared the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and whose law requires his followers to.

Surah 9.29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

As bequeathed to his followers by one of the most consummate and self-admitted terrorists in the history of mankind

Sura 8:12 I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them

A promise binding on his true followers through Muhammad's "law".

Sura 9.111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.

Which is, of course, why there have been over 17,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world, just since 9-11.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
However that sura is a lie regarding the Gospel, nor is there an open ended license to engage in imperialistic conquest and murder under the old covenant law.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2369.0

So, enjoy your faith, I hope it takes you to salvation.

Jhn 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Rom 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

And leave me be, I've got more important things to do with my life than to argue with those who initiate discussions without any intention of actually being objective or even "rational".

From one that must believe in flying donkey-mules, and buys into a demonic "tradition" that didn't even exist before the 5th century AD, when Arabian pagans established it. Star Family, jinn-devil and occult Sabian rituals, that Muhammad thinly repackaged and embellished in the 7th century.

You're not looking for the truth, you're looking for justification for your faith which is seriously threatened "theologically" by Islam, ......

It can only be the spirit of antichrist, that can blind a poor soul so completely, when Islam is in fact unscriptural, unhistorical, and contrary to archaeology and geography.

...... and to do so, you try to poke holes in the hull of Islam. But, alas, you'll never succeed.

My friend, the whole ship of 7th and 8th century created Muhammadan fictional "tradition" breaks itself in two amidships on a reef, once we understand that Mecca did not exist before the 4th century. The first shot from outside of Islam, never even needs to be fired, to strike the next blow. Like the fact that Muhammad declared the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and that Muhammadanism is ANTICHRIST.

Let's agree to disagree, and let's make it a point to meet in the afterlife and compare notes.

Unfortunately, according to the Word of God, that would seem beyond difficult.

Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

You see, if you had remained ignorant, you might have had an excuse.

Rom 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, [there is] no transgression.

But now that you know the truth, and continue to choose a lie of the opposite of truth, of repackaged Sabian and Quraish pagan moon, sun, star and jinn-demon worship straight out of the pit of hell, you will be held accountable in judgment.

2Pe 2:21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known [it], to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

As for now, I've got work to do and deadlines to meet, and reading your rhetoric takes too much of my valuable time.

Tragically the "value" you place on your time, is of value in regard to the things of this world - that has been Satan's legal possession ever since Adam's fall.
Though you certainly aren't the first with no time for truth. But you could die this very day, as a follower of Muhammad, rejecting the price Jesus Christ paid to save you.

2Pe 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

Forever is a very long time.

Consider yourself blocked.... that is, once I remember how that is done here on youTube.

Cheers,

I praise the Lord that I don't have to run and hide from the truth. The act you took is for the same reason the Gospel is restricted in 51 countries today. Imagine being so terrified of truth that you couldn't even risk receiving and then simply deleting further PMs from me. Doesn't that communicate something to you?

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2011, 12:24:17 PM »
5-21

One last thing, you said, "The Arabic spoken today is that of Muhammad's pagan tribe the Quraish"

LOL.... DUH! you figured that one out on your own???? of course it isn't!!! we speak slang vernacular Arabic, but we study Standard Arabic at schools, AS WELL AS, Archaic Arabic through learning the Quran, so every Arabic who reads the Quran understands it, .......

The Quran is in the pop-Arabic of Muhammad's tribe the Quraish. An interestingly appropriate language for a pop stand-alone 7th century religion. A very new language not only on the world stage, but even in the Arabian peninsula. It came from east Africa, just like the ancestors of Muhammad's non-Ishmaelite (likely Hamitic) tribe the Quraish did, when they migrated across the straight from Ethiopia to Yemen.

..... save for a few words here and there that one might need to open the dictionary to look up the definition for. Just like when you read Shakespeare. Are you trying to tell me that the English speaking learned people are not equipped to understand Shakespeare because "it's not the spoken dialect", as you put it???????

Get a life!!!!!!!

The Arabic spoken and written today is that derived from the Quraish pagans, that supplanted the older tongues spoken around the Arabian peninsula through imperialistic conquest, just as I said earlier.
If you had visited the link you might have understood.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=1693.0

Maybe these links will help get my point across.

http://www.vistawide.com/arabic/arabic.htm
"Arabic, which was originally a minor language of the Arabian Peninsula, began to spread in the 7th century with the rise of Islam. Apart from being the native language of over 200 million speakers located primarily in Northern Africa and throughout the Middle East, Arabic is therefore also the liturgical language of the vast population of Muslims around the world."

http://www.indiana.edu/~arabic/arabic_history.htm
"The rise of Arabic to the status of a major world language is inextricably intertwined with the rise of Islam as a major world religion. Before the appearance of Islam, Arabic was a minor member of the southern branch of the Semitic language family, used by a small number of largely nomadic tribes in the Arabian peninsula, with an extremely poorly documented textual history."

http://www.soyouwanna.com/history-arabic-language-1143.html
"Prior to the revelation to the prophet Mohammad and the subsequent spread of Arabic as the language of the new religion of Islam, Arabic paled as a linguistic power in comparison to Latin, Greek and other languages of the time."

"Like all other Semitic languages, Arabic is the descendant of a so-called "Proto-Semitic" language, which is currently believed to have developed in East Africa and which never evolved in a written form. Arabic and Amharic, the two most recent Semitic languages, both arose in the mid-300s."

Arabic developing in East Africa makes perfect sense, since Muhammad's ancestors migrated across the strait from Ethiopia, to Yemen.

http://www.alhewar.com/habeeb_salloum_arabic_language.htm
"The Arabic language is the youngest of Semitic idioms which include Aramaic, the Assyro-Babylonian tongues, Ethiopic, Hebrew and South Arabic like Sabean and Himyaritic."

Simply Google it if you have been deluded into believing that Arabic is an ancient language.

Peter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 8702
  • the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
    • View Profile
    • False Prophet Muhammad
Re: Chat with Psychlopes beginning 5-18-2011
« Reply #24 on: May 23, 2011, 04:55:54 AM »
revisiting an earlier post that became irrelevant in light of the facts that followed.

5-20 psy

As for Sura 5:47 ... LOL.
I guess you didn't read the very next verse, being the blind parrot of anti-Islamic sites that you are...

"5:48 (Asad) And unto thee [O Prophet] have We vouchsafed this divine writ, setting forth the truth, confirming the truth of whatever there still remains of earlier revelations and determining what is true therein.

Try it again.

Sura 5:47 Let the people of the Gospel judge by what "Allah" hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/

What Gospel are Christians supposed to judge, by what Allah revealed therein? A non-existent Gospel? The gospel of Muhammad? The 17th century Muhammadan forgery of the gospel of Barnabas in which Jesus declares Muhammad to be the Messiah? http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=465.0

Sorry my friend, but something isn't "confirmed", by a declaration of the EXACT OPPOSITE, of it's WHOLE SUBJECT.
http://www.islamandthetruth.com/the_lamb_slain.htm
http://www.petewaldo.com/

So the only conclusion that can reasonably be reached is that the false prophet Muhammad's "revelations" were inspired by Satan himself, as demonstrated on so many levels detailed previously, and as also manifest in Muhammad's true followers, who emulate the behavior of one of the most consummate terrorists in the history of mankind, and thus are responsible for most of the murder, mayhem and misery, all around the world today.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

[64] Judge, then, between the followers of earlier revelation in accordance with what God has bestowed from on high, [65] and do not follow their errant views, forsaking the truth that has come unto thee. Unto every one of you have We appointed a [different] law and way of life."


And to put your mind at ease, that verse was sent to instruct the prophet to let Christians and Jews arbitrate according to their laws and not Shari'a, which if anything just goes to show that Islam isn't trying to shove it's laws down people's throats.

Whether a feeble attempt at taqiyyah, or abject ignorance of Islamic history, the reality of Islam for the last 1400 years and unto today has been the opposite of your preposterous claim.
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?topic=2364.0
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://islamchristianforum.com/index.php?board=51.0
With the Gospel restricted in 51 countries.
http://www.persecution.com/public/restrictednations.aspx?clickfrom=bWFpbl9tZW51

Noble Qur'an:2:190 Footnote: "Jihad is holy fighting in Allah's Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah's Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite."
http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Jihad.Islam