We are at the beginning of the end.
Or the end of the end and on the verse of Christ's return, considering John's "whole world" though an ethnographic hermeneutic. It doesn't include nukes in the mix like some passages indicate, but I'm not going to say that anything necessarily has to happen before the return of my Lord and Savior. I just don't get how Muslims that aren't violent, don't understand that they will loose their freedom and be just as dead or subjugated as every non-Muslim.
Sounds pretty basic to me. These Muslims you speak of believe only in Muhammad. Whatever Muhammad says must be real. They think they don't have to prove a thing. If they think Muhammad was peaceful by only reading certain verses, then that's all they're going to do.
Hey! Ever consider reverse psychology? Since it it obvious to me that you have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to what all those Quranic verses you've been spitting out, why don't you have them explain, say, 9:5 or 9:29? Since you're not educated in this field and they are (Muslims. that is), maybe they can explain what it really means!
I'd love to see how that turns out! 
Quran Surah 9.29
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!The wishful
hypocrite Muslims will say Muhammad's commandments like that only related to specific historical events (even though repeated throughout 1400 years), or were only 7th century related, while the true fundamental followers of Muhammad will say (as we do about the Gospel) that Muhammad's commandments in the Quran are just as relevant today as they were in the 7th century and will be forever. That 1400 years of Islamic history and the first Islamic jihad conquest all the way up into France and Austria confirms it.
The question is, who wins the debate and becomes the ultimate arbiter of Muhammadanism? The wishful self-deluded western peacenick, apostate, hypocrite standing naked and empty handed with nothing but wishful unsupported opinion, or the true fundamental followers of Muhammad that disagree with them, who are armed with the Quran and Hadith in one hand and a beheading knife in the other? Doing as Muhammad did and commanded his followers to do.
Those self-deluded peacenick liars and cheerleaders that don't leave Islam but instead help to advance it, are bringing their own demise upon themselves and their heirs in this world, let alone the next. I say "let alone" because I can't know Jesus' judgments, or the extent to which He gives ignorance a pass, but the Gospel gives us a pretty good idea as to what's in store for antichrists:
John 3:36
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
